World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
46
Citations
11613
World Ranking
4556
National Ranking
497

Clive K. Catchpole publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Clive K. Catchpole sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 79 publications — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Clive K. Catchpole D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Clive K. Catchpole sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Clive K. Catchpole is affiliated with Royal Holloway University of London in the United Kingdom. Their academic work is rooted in this institution, where they conduct research and contribute to scholarly activities.

Details on recent papers, including titles, publication years, and venues, are not available for Clive K. Catchpole. Similarly, information on frequent co-authors does not appear in the current data set.

There are no listings of frequent publication venues or book publications connected with this researcher, nor are there specific fields or subfields of study identified in the information provided.

Data regarding main topics of work or any awards won by Clive K. Catchpole are not included in the current record.

Clive K. Catchpole is currently living according to the latest available data.

Best Publications

  • Bird Song: Biological Themes and Variations

    Clive Catchpole;P. J. B. Slater

  • Bird song: Biological themes and variations, 2nd ed.

    Unknown

  • Sexual Selection and the Evolution of Complex Songs Among European Warblers of the Genus Acr Ocephal Us

    Clive K. Catchpole

  • Song as an honest signal of past developmental stress in the European starling (Sturnus vulgaris)

    Katherine Louise Buchanan;K. A. Spencer;A. R. Goldsmith;C. K. Catchpole

  • Song as an honest signal of developmental stress in the zebra finch (Taeniopygia guttata).

    K.A Spencer;K.L Buchanan;A.R Goldsmith;C.K Catchpole

  • Bird song, sexual selection and female choice.

    Clive K. Catchpole

  • Female choice in the sedge warbler Acrocephalus schoenobaenus multiple cues from song and territory quality

    Katherine L. Buchanan;Clive K. Catchpole

  • Design of Playback Experiments: The Thornbridge Hall NATO ARW Consensus

    Peter K. McGregor;Clive K. Catchpole;Torben Dabelsteen;J. Bruce Falls

  • Differential responses to male song repertoires in female songbirds implanted with oestradiol

    C. K. Catchpole;J. Dittami;B. Leisler

  • Variation in the song of the great reed warbler Acrocephalus arundinaceus in relation to mate attraction and territorial defence

    Clive K. Catchpole

  • Parasites affect song complexity and neural development in a songbird.

    Karen A Spencer;Katherine L Buchanan;Stefan Leitner;Arthur R Goldsmith

  • Developmental stress selectively affects the song control nucleus HVC in the zebra finch

    Katherine L. Buchanan;Stefan Leitner;Karen A. Spencer;Arthur R. Goldsmith

  • The Functions of Advertising Song in the Sedge Warbler (Acrocephalus Schoenobaenus) and the Reed Warbler (a. Scirpaceus)

    Clive K. Catchpole

  • 9 – The Evolution of Bird Sounds in Relation to Mating and Spacing Behavior

    Unknown

  • Song repertoires and reproductive success in the great reed warbler Acrocephalus arundinaceus

    Clive K. Catchpole

  • Song as an indicator of parasitism in the sedge warbler.

    Katherine L. Buchanan;C. K. Catchpole;J. W. Lewis;A. Lodge

  • Song as an indicator of male parental effort in the sedge warbler

    Katherine L. Buchanan;Clive K. Catchpole

  • Developmental stress affects the attractiveness of male song and female choice in the zebra finch ( Taeniopygia guttata )

    K. A. Spencer;J. H. Wimpenny;K. L. Buchanan;P. G. Lovell

  • Polygyny in the great reed warbler, Acrocephalus arundinaceus: a possible case of deception

    Clive Catchpole;Bernd Leisler;Hans Winkler

  • Sexual differences in the responses of captive great reed warblers (Acrocephalus arundinaceus) to variation in song structure and repertoire size

    Clive Catchpole;Bernd Leisler;John Dittami

  • Developmental stress, social rank and song complexity in the European starling (Sturnus vulgaris)

    KA Spencer;Katherine Buchanan;AR Goldsmith;CK Catchpole

  • Interspecific territorialism and competition in Acrocephalus warblers as revealed by playback experiments in areas of sympathy and allopatry

    Clive K. Catchpole

Frequent Co-Authors

Katherine L. Buchanan
Katherine L. Buchanan Deakin University
Bernd Leisler
Bernd Leisler Max Planck Society
Andrew T. D. Bennett
Andrew T. D. Bennett Deakin University
Tamás Székely
Tamás Székely University of Bath
Peter K. McGregor
Peter K. McGregor Cornwall College
Laurene M. Ratcliffe
Laurene M. Ratcliffe Queen's University
William A. Searcy
William A. Searcy University of Miami
John W. Lewis
John W. Lewis Royal Holloway University of London
Andrew G. Horn
Andrew G. Horn Dalhousie University
Daniel M. Weary
Daniel M. Weary University of British Columbia

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Ecology and Evolution opens doors to a variety of online degrees and career opportunities in allied fields, especially in healthcare and science. Students interested in flexible study options can benefit from accelerated programs similar to those found in nursing and medical sciences.

For example, nursing offers programs such as the 6 month rn to bsn program, enabling registered nurses to quickly advance their qualifications. If you're considering an advanced nursing role, transitioning from an ADN to a family nurse practitioner can be accomplished through specialized adn to fnp bridge programs.

Those with a non-nursing background can still enter the field through direct entry msn online programs. Additionally, for the best academic value, comparing top institutions—like in the best value nursing education online wgu guide—can help you choose the right online pathway.

These online options highlight the growing trend of flexible, career-oriented education—useful for students of Ecology and Evolution seeking interdisciplinary growth or exploring roles in healthcare, research, or public policy.

Best Scientists Citing Clive K. Catchpole

Recently Published Articles