World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
54
Citations
13576
World Ranking
15459
National Ranking
6453

Christopher L. Woodcock publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Christopher L. Woodcock sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 100 publications — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Christopher L. Woodcock D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Christopher L. Woodcock sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 54 D-Index — 22nd percentile

22% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Christopher L. Woodcock is affiliated with the University of Massachusetts Amherst in the United States. Their academic profile focuses on research contributions associated with this institution.

There is no detailed publicly available information on recent papers authored by Christopher L. Woodcock, including titles, publication venues, or citation records.

Information about frequent co-authors is not present, indicating either limited collaborative data or no consistently recurring co-authorship patterns in the available sources.

The publication venues where Christopher L. Woodcock has contributed are not specified, leaving the precise scope and disciplinary focus of their publishing activities undetermined.

Data regarding book publications by Christopher L. Woodcock, including publishers or the number of books authored, is not provided.

Records of main fields of study, subfields of study, and main topics of research work that characterize Christopher L. Woodcock's academic focus have not been disclosed.

No information is available about any awards or honors received by Christopher L. Woodcock, including the years or citations related to such recognitions.

Best Publications

  • Chromatin compaction by a polycomb group protein complex.

    Nicole J. Francis;Robert E. Kingston;Christopher L. Woodcock

  • Ezh1 and Ezh2 maintain repressive chromatin through different mechanisms.

    Raphael Margueron;Guohong Li;Kavitha Sarma;Alexandre Blais

  • Nucleosomes, linker DNA, and linker histone form a unique structural motif that directs the higher-order folding and compaction of chromatin

    Jan Bednar;Rachel A. Horowitz;Sergei A. Grigoryev;Lenny M. Carruthers

  • Histone H1 Depletion in Mammals Alters Global Chromatin Structure but Causes Specific Changes in Gene Regulation

    Yuhong Fan;Tatiana Nikitina;Jie Zhao;Tomara J. Fleury

  • Role of linker histone in chromatin structure and function: H1 stoichiometry and nucleosome repeat length

    Christopher L. Woodcock;Arthur I. Skoultchi;Yuhong Fan

  • Chromatin higher-order structure and dynamics.

    Christopher L. Woodcock;Rajarshi P. Ghosh

  • Higher-order structure of chromatin and chromosomes

    Christopher L Woodcock;Stefan Dimitrov

  • H1 linker histones are essential for mouse development and affect nucleosome spacing in vivo.

    Yuhong Fan;Tatiana Nikitina;Elizabeth M. Morin-Kensicki;Jie Zhao

  • Chromatin Compaction by Human MeCP2 ASSEMBLY OF NOVEL SECONDARY CHROMATIN STRUCTURES IN THE ABSENCE OF DNA METHYLATION

    Philippe T. Georgel;Philippe T. Georgel;Rachel A. Horowitz-Scherer;Nick Adkins;Christopher L. Woodcock

  • A chromatin folding model that incorporates linker variability generates fibers resembling the native structures.

    C L Woodcock;S A Grigoryev;R A Horowitz;N Whitaker

  • Evidence for heteromorphic chromatin fibers from analysis of nucleosome interactions

    Sergei A. Grigoryev;Gaurav Arya;Sarah Correll;Christopher L. Woodcock

  • The three-dimensional architecture of chromatin in situ: electron tomography reveals fibers composed of a continuously variable zig-zag nucleosomal ribbon.

    R A Horowitz;D A Agard;J W Sedat;C L Woodcock

  • Structural repeating units in chromatin: I. Evidence for their general occurrence

    C.L.F. Woodcock;J.P. Safer;J.E. Stanchfield

  • A histone-fold complex and FANCM form a conserved DNA remodeling complex to maintain genome stability

    Zhijiang Yan;Mathieu Delannoy;Chen Ling;Danielle Daee

  • Structural analysis of the yeast SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling complex.

    Corey Lewis Smith;Rachel A. Horowitz-Scherer;Joan Frances Flanagan;Christopher L. Woodcock

  • Multiple modes of interaction between the methylated DNA binding protein MeCP2 and chromatin.

    Tatiana Nikitina;Xi Shi;Rajarshi P. Ghosh;Rachel A. Horowitz-Scherer

  • Chromatin Conformation and Salt-induced Compaction: Three-dimensional Structural Information from Cryoelectron Microscopy

    Jan Bednar;Rachel A. Horowitz;Jacques Dubochet;Christopher L. Woodcock

  • Nucleosome-free region dominates histone acetylation in targeting SWR1 to promoters for H2A.Z replacement.

    Anand Ranjan;Gaku Mizuguchi;Peter C. FitzGerald;Debbie Wei

  • Closed chromatin loops at the ends of chromosomes

    Tatiana Nikitina;Christopher L. Woodcock

  • Intrinsic disorder and autonomous domain function in the multifunctional nuclear protein, MeCP2.

    Valerie H. Adams;Steven J. McBryant;Paul A. Wade;Christopher L. Woodcock

Frequent Co-Authors

Jeffrey C. Hansen
Jeffrey C. Hansen Colorado State University
Lawrence Bogorad
Lawrence Bogorad Harvard University
Lila M. Gierasch
Lila M. Gierasch University of Massachusetts Amherst
Arthur I. Skoultchi
Arthur I. Skoultchi Albert Einstein College of Medicine
Tamar Schlick
Tamar Schlick New York University
Paul A. Wade
Paul A. Wade National Institutes of Health
Carl Wu
Carl Wu Johns Hopkins University
Danesh Moazed
Danesh Moazed Harvard University
Abraham J. Koster
Abraham J. Koster Leiden University Medical Center
Craig L. Peterson
Craig L. Peterson University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Biology or Biochemistry in the USA opens doors to a wide range of specialized online programs and career options in healthcare, research, and management. Many students are now choosing flexible online degrees to gain advanced knowledge and skills without interrupting their careers or relocating.

If you’re interested in nutritional science, you can explore some of the best online nutrition programs to deepen your understanding of diet, health, and disease prevention. For those focused on the business aspects of healthcare, consider enrolling in top online mha programs that are cahme accredited to build leadership skills and meet recognized accreditation standards.

Advanced nursing professionals might benefit from online dnp programs without clinicals, which allow for flexible study and emphasize evidence-based practice. Aspiring healthcare executives and researchers can also pursue online doctoral programs healthcare administration for high-level roles in hospitals, policy, or academia.

These pathways illustrate the diverse and evolving opportunities available for Biology and Biochemistry graduates. With online education, you can tailor your studies to match your professional goals and interests in the health and life sciences sectors.

Best Scientists Citing Christopher L. Woodcock

Recently Published Articles