World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Immunology

D-Index
50
Citations
9676
World Ranking
4236
National Ranking
16

Catherine Orrell publication distribution in Immunology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Immunology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Catherine Orrell sits on this spectrum.

62–71 publications: 9 scientists 72–81 publications: 23 scientists 82–91 publications: 40 scientists 92–101 publications: 72 scientists 102–111 publications: 86 scientists 112–121 publications: 108 scientists 122–131 publications: 150 scientists 132–141 publications: 160 scientists 142–151 publications: 159 scientists 152–161 publications: 189 scientists 162–171 publications: 166 scientists 172–181 publications: 181 scientists 182–191 publications: 188 scientists 192–201 publications: 187 scientists 202–211 publications: 178 scientists 212–221 publications: 158 scientists 222–231 publications: 168 scientists 232–241 publications: 159 scientists 242–251 publications: 160 scientists 252–261 publications: 148 scientists 262–271 publications: 116 scientists 272–281 publications: 125 scientists 282–291 publications: 115 scientists 292–301 publications: 111 scientists 302–311 publications: 95 scientists 312–321 publications: 97 scientists 322–331 publications: 97 scientists 332–341 publications: 99 scientists 342–351 publications: 96 scientists 352–361 publications: 68 scientists 362–371 publications: 76 scientists 372–381 publications: 71 scientists 382–391 publications: 71 scientists 392–401 publications: 62 scientists 402–411 publications: 54 scientists 412–421 publications: 41 scientists 422–431 publications: 63 scientists 432–441 publications: 53 scientists 442–451 publications: 31 scientists 452–461 publications: 42 scientists 462–471 publications: 40 scientists 472–481 publications: 29 scientists 482–491 publications: 34 scientists 492–501 publications: 30 scientists 502–511 publications: 23 scientists 512–521 publications: 41 scientists 522–531 publications: 29 scientists 532–541 publications: 28 scientists 542–551 publications: 16 scientists 552–561 publications: 18 scientists 562–571 publications: 18 scientists 572–581 publications: 17 scientists 582–591 publications: 17 scientists 592–601 publications: 17 scientists 602–611 publications: 19 scientists 612–621 publications: 13 scientists 622–631 publications: 12 scientists 632–641 publications: 11 scientists 642–651 publications: 16 scientists 652–661 publications: 9 scientists 662–671 publications: 5 scientists 672–681 publications: 13 scientists 682–691 publications: 12 scientists 692–701 publications: 6 scientists 702–711 publications: 6 scientists 712–721 publications: 9 scientists 722–731 publications: 9 scientists 732–741 publications: 6 scientists 742–751 publications: 11 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 7 scientists 772–781 publications: 12 scientists 782–791 publications: 7 scientists 792–801 publications: 5 scientists 802–806 publications: 1 scientists 807+ publications: 100 scientists
62 publications 807+

This scientist: 214 publications — 40th percentile

40% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 807 publications or more.

Catherine Orrell D-index placement in Immunology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Immunology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Catherine Orrell sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 28 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 91 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 157 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 192 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 175 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 188 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 177 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 155 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 194 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 201 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 197 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 201 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 173 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 167 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 172 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 199 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 184 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 133 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 162 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 125 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 121 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 102 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 96 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 75 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 74 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 66 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 68 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 60 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 54 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 36 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 23 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 52 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 41 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 34 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 25 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 28 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 11 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 19 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 20 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 17 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 14 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 15 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 9 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 11 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 9 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 7 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 7 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 5 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156 D-Index: 6 scientists 157+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40 D-Index 157+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 157 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Guidelines for improving entry into and retention in care and antiretroviral adherence for persons with HIV: evidence-based recommendations from an International Association of Physicians in AIDS Care panel.

    Melanie A. Thompson;Michael J. Mugavero;K. Rivet Amico;Victoria A. Cargill

  • Early mortality among adults accessing a community-based antiretroviral service in South Africa: implications for programme design.

    Stephen D Lawn;Landon Myer;Catherine Orrell;Linda-Gail Bekker

  • Two Randomized Trials of Neutralizing Antibodies to Prevent HIV-1 Acquisition

    Lawrence Corey;Peter B Gilbert;Michal Juraska;David C Montefiori

  • Adherence is not a barrier to successful antiretroviral therapy in South Africa.

    Catherine Orrell;David R. Bangsberg;Motasim Badri;Robin Wood

  • Nurse versus doctor management of HIV-infected patients receiving antiretroviral therapy (CIPRA-SA): a randomised non-inferiority trial

    Ian Sanne;Catherine Orrell;Matthew P Fox;Francesca Conradie

  • Long-acting cabotegravir and rilpivirine dosed every 2 months in adults with HIV-1 infection (ATLAS-2M), 48-week results: a randomised, multicentre, open-label, phase 3b, non-inferiority study

    Edgar T Overton;Gary Richmond;Giuliano Rizzardini;Hans Jaeger

  • Determinants of mortality and nondeath losses from an antiretroviral treatment service in South Africa: implications for program evaluation.

    Stephen D. Lawn;Landon Myer;Guy Harling;Catherine Orrell

  • Mortality of HIV-infected patients starting antiretroviral therapy in sub-Saharan Africa: comparison with HIV-unrelated mortality.

    Martin W. G. Brinkhof;Andrew Boulle;Ralf Weigel;Eugène Messou

  • Rapid scale-up of a community-based HIV treatment service: programme performance over 3 consecutive years in Guguletu, South Africa.

    Linda-Gail Bekker;Landon Myer;Catherine Orrell;Steve Lawn

  • Linkage to HIV Care and Antiretroviral Therapy in Cape Town, South Africa

    Katharina Kranzer;Katharina Kranzer;Jennifer Zeinecker;Philip Ginsberg;Catherine Orrell

  • Improving antiretroviral therapy adherence in resource-limited settings at scale: a discussion of interventions and recommendations

    Jessica E. Haberer;Lora Sabin;K. Rivet Amico;Catherine Orrell

  • Conservation of first-line antiretroviral treatment regimen where therapeutic options are limited.

    Catherine Orrell;Guy Harling;Stephen D Lawn;Richard Kaplan

  • Substitutions due to antiretroviral toxicity or contraindication in the first 3 years of antiretroviral therapy in a large South African cohort.

    Andrew Boulle;Catherine Orrel;Richard Kaplan;Gilles Van Cutsem

  • Changing mortality risk associated with CD4 cell response to antiretroviral therapy in South Africa

    Stephen D Lawn;Francesca Little;Linda-Gail Bekker;Richard Kaplan

  • Public-health and individual approaches to antiretroviral therapy: township South Africa and Switzerland compared.

    Olivia Keiser;Catherine Orrell;Matthias Egger;Matthias Egger;Robin Wood

  • Treatment interruption in a primary care antiretroviral therapy program in South Africa: cohort analysis of trends and risk factors.

    Katharina Kranzer;James J Lewis;Nathan Ford;Jennifer Zeinecker

  • Doravirine versus ritonavir-boosted darunavir in antiretroviral-naive adults with HIV-1 (DRIVE-FORWARD): 48-week results of a randomised, double-blind, phase 3, non-inferiority trial

    Jean-Michel Molina;Kathleen Squires;Paul E Sax;Pedro Cahn

  • Cryptococcocal immune reconstitution disease: a major cause of early mortality in a South African antiretroviral programme.

    Stephen D Lawn;Linda-Gail Bekker;Landon Myer;Catherine Orrell

  • Changes in Programmatic Outcomes During 7 Years of Scale-up at a Community-Based Antiretroviral Treatment Service in South Africa

    Nglazi;Lawn Sd;Kaplan R;Kranzer K

  • Outcomes of antiretroviral treatment in programmes with and without routine viral load monitoring in Southern Africa.

    Olivia Keiser;Benjamin H. Chi;Thomas Gsponer;Andrew Boulle

Frequent Co-Authors

Robin Wood
Robin Wood University of Cape Town
Linda-Gail Bekker
Linda-Gail Bekker University of Cape Town
David R. Bangsberg
David R. Bangsberg Simon Fraser University
Landon Myer
Landon Myer University of Cape Town
Stephen D. Lawn
Stephen D. Lawn London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine
Gary Maartens
Gary Maartens University of Cape Town
Saye Khoo
Saye Khoo University of Liverpool
Glenda Gray
Glenda Gray South African Medical Research Council
Alexander C. Tsai
Alexander C. Tsai Harvard University
Nathan Ford
Nathan Ford World Health Organization

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Catherine Orrell