World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
30
Citations
4422
World Ranking
7691
National Ranking
549

Catherine Elder publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Catherine Elder sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 95 publications — 11th percentile

11% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Catherine Elder D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Catherine Elder sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 30 D-Index — 2nd percentile

2% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Implicit and Explicit Knowledge in Second Language Learning, Testing and Teaching

    Rod Ellis;Rod Ellis;Shawn Loewen;Catherine Elder;Rosemary Erlam

  • Can We Predict Task Difficulty in an Oral Proficiency Test? Exploring the Potential of an Information-Processing Approach to Task Design

    Noriko Iwashita;Tim McNamara;Catherine Elder

  • Estimating the difficulty of oral proficiency tasks: what does the test-taker have to offer?:

    Catherine Elder;Noriko Iwashita;Tim McNamara

  • Up to a quarter of the Australian population may have suboptimal health literacy depending upon the measurement tool: results from a population-based survey.

    Melissa Naughton Barber;Margaret Staples;Richard Harry Osborne;Rosemary Anne Clerehan

  • ASSESSING ENGLISH AS A LINGUA FRANCA

    Catherine Elder;Alan Davies

  • Evaluating rater responses to an online training program for L2 writing assessment

    Catherine Elder;Gary Barkhuizen;Ute Knoch;Janet von Randow

  • Language choices and pedagogic functions in the foreign language classroom: a cross-linguistic functional analysis of teacher talk

    Sun Hee Ok Kim;Catherine Anne Elder

  • What counts as effective communication in nursing? Evidence from nurse educators' and clinicians' feedback on nurse interactions with simulated patients

    Sally O'Hagan;Elizabeth Manias;Catherine Elder;John Pill

  • Understanding aviation English as a lingua franca: Perceptions of Korean aviation personnel

    Hyejeong Kim;Catherine Elder

  • Assessing the language proficiency of teachers: are there any border controls?

    Catherine Elder

  • Judgments of oral proficiency by non-native and native English speaking teacher raters: Competing or complementary constructs?

    Ying Zhang;Catherine Elder

  • The Practice of LSP

    Helen Basturkmen;Catherine Elder

  • Planning for Test Performance: Does it Make a Difference?

    Catherine Anne Elder;Noriko Iwashita

  • L2 Learning Strategies

    Unknown

  • Investigating the validity of an integrated listening-speaking task: A discourse-based analysis of test takers’ oral performances

    Kellie Frost;Catherine Elder;Gillian Wigglesworth

  • The Relationship between Metalinguistic Knowledge and Learning Outcomes among Undergraduate Students of Chinese

    Catherine Anne Elder;Diane Manwaring

  • Interrogating the Construct of Aviation English: Feedback from Test Takers in Korea.

    Hyejeong Kim;Catherine Elder

  • Language testing and English as an international language: constraints and contributions

    Catherine Elder;Luke Harding

  • How do subject specialists construe classroom language proficiency

    Catherine Elder

  • Implicit and Explicit Knowledge in Second Language Learning, Testing and Teaching

    Unknown

Frequent Co-Authors

Tim McNamara
Tim McNamara University of Melbourne
Elizabeth Manias
Elizabeth Manias Deakin University
Gillian Wigglesworth
Gillian Wigglesworth University of Melbourne
Alan Davies
Alan Davies University of Edinburgh
Richard H. Osborne
Richard H. Osborne Swinburne University of Technology
Rachelle Buchbinder
Rachelle Buchbinder Monash University
Rod Ellis
Rod Ellis Curtin University
Shawn Loewen
Shawn Loewen Michigan State University
Janet Fletcher
Janet Fletcher University of Melbourne
Gary Barkhuizen
Gary Barkhuizen University of Auckland

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Catherine Elder

Recently Published Articles