World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering

D-Index
43
Citations
7163
World Ranking
1722
National Ranking
661

Carolyn Conner Seepersad publication distribution in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Carolyn Conner Seepersad sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 10 scientists 57–66 publications: 23 scientists 67–76 publications: 32 scientists 77–86 publications: 62 scientists 87–96 publications: 67 scientists 97–106 publications: 91 scientists 107–116 publications: 113 scientists 117–126 publications: 114 scientists 127–136 publications: 130 scientists 137–146 publications: 140 scientists 147–156 publications: 155 scientists 157–166 publications: 132 scientists 167–176 publications: 133 scientists 177–186 publications: 130 scientists 187–196 publications: 140 scientists 197–206 publications: 115 scientists 207–216 publications: 125 scientists 217–226 publications: 117 scientists 227–236 publications: 99 scientists 237–246 publications: 92 scientists 247–256 publications: 100 scientists 257–266 publications: 95 scientists 267–276 publications: 88 scientists 277–286 publications: 77 scientists 287–296 publications: 74 scientists 297–306 publications: 74 scientists 307–316 publications: 61 scientists 317–326 publications: 69 scientists 327–336 publications: 59 scientists 337–346 publications: 58 scientists 347–356 publications: 45 scientists 357–366 publications: 44 scientists 367–376 publications: 36 scientists 377–386 publications: 41 scientists 387–396 publications: 32 scientists 397–406 publications: 23 scientists 407–416 publications: 28 scientists 417–426 publications: 27 scientists 427–436 publications: 25 scientists 437–446 publications: 23 scientists 447–456 publications: 23 scientists 457–466 publications: 20 scientists 467–476 publications: 12 scientists 477–486 publications: 24 scientists 487–496 publications: 18 scientists 497–506 publications: 12 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 21 scientists 527–536 publications: 12 scientists 537–546 publications: 8 scientists 547–556 publications: 16 scientists 557–566 publications: 3 scientists 567–576 publications: 11 scientists 577–586 publications: 6 scientists 587–596 publications: 5 scientists 597–606 publications: 6 scientists 607–616 publications: 7 scientists 617–626 publications: 7 scientists 627–636 publications: 10 scientists 637–646 publications: 4 scientists 647–656 publications: 3 scientists 657–658 publications: 2 scientists 659+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 659+

This scientist: 223 publications — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more.

Carolyn Conner Seepersad D-index placement in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Carolyn Conner Seepersad sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 83 scientists 31 D-Index: 113 scientists 32 D-Index: 144 scientists 33 D-Index: 153 scientists 34 D-Index: 189 scientists 35 D-Index: 158 scientists 36 D-Index: 139 scientists 37 D-Index: 127 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 125 scientists 40 D-Index: 104 scientists 41 D-Index: 100 scientists 42 D-Index: 106 scientists 43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44 D-Index: 103 scientists 45 D-Index: 79 scientists 46 D-Index: 88 scientists 47 D-Index: 70 scientists 48 D-Index: 83 scientists 49 D-Index: 44 scientists 50 D-Index: 64 scientists 51 D-Index: 56 scientists 52 D-Index: 50 scientists 53 D-Index: 48 scientists 54 D-Index: 58 scientists 55 D-Index: 52 scientists 56 D-Index: 48 scientists 57 D-Index: 42 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 37 scientists 61 D-Index: 42 scientists 62 D-Index: 44 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 33 scientists 65 D-Index: 29 scientists 66 D-Index: 23 scientists 67 D-Index: 29 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 19 scientists 70 D-Index: 34 scientists 71 D-Index: 26 scientists 72 D-Index: 19 scientists 73 D-Index: 18 scientists 74 D-Index: 19 scientists 75 D-Index: 14 scientists 76 D-Index: 19 scientists 77 D-Index: 8 scientists 78 D-Index: 18 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 17 scientists 82 D-Index: 11 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 7 scientists 85 D-Index: 9 scientists 86 D-Index: 8 scientists 87 D-Index: 6 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 10 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 4 scientists 93+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 93+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Negative stiffness honeycombs for recoverable shock isolation

    Dixon M. Correa;Timothy Klatt;Sergio Cortes;Michael Haberman

  • Analytical and Experimental Investigation of Buckled Beams as Negative Stiffness Elements for Passive Vibration and Shock Isolation Systems

    Benjamin A. Fulcher;David W. Shahan;Michael R. Haberman;Carolyn Conner Seepersad

  • A comparison of creativity and innovation metrics and sample validation through in-class design projects

    Sarah K. Oman;Irem Y. Tumer;Kris Wood;Carolyn Conner Seepersad

  • An Experimental Investigation of the Innovation Capabilities of Undergraduate Engineering Students

    Nicole Genco;Katja Hölttä-Otto;Carolyn Conner Seepersad

  • Robust Design for Multiscale and Multidisciplinary Applications

    Janet K. Allen;Carolyn Conner Seepersad;Hae Jin Choi;Farrokh Mistree

  • Additive Manufacturing Review: Early Past to Current Practice

    J. J. Beaman;D. L. Bourell;C. C. Seepersad;D. Kovar

  • Balancing commonality and performance within the concurrent design of multiple products in a product family

    Timothy W. Simpson;Carolyn Conner Seepersad;Farrokh Mistree

  • Mechanical design of negative stiffness honeycomb materials

    Dixon M Correa;Carolyn Conner Seepersad;Michael R Haberman

  • A comparison of the energy efficiency of selective laser sintering and injection molding of nylon parts

    Cassandra Telenko;Carolyn Conner Seepersad

  • Design, fabrication, and evaluation of negative stiffness elements using SLS

    Lia Kashdan;Carolyn Conner Seepersad;Michael Haberman;Preston S. Wilson

  • Design of multifunctional honeycomb materials

    Carolyn Conner Seepersad;Benjamin M. Dempsey;Janet K. Allen;Farrokh Mistree

  • The characteristics of innovative, mechanical products

    Matthew N. Saunders;Carolyn Conner Seepersad;Katja Hölttä-Otto

  • Challenges and Opportunities in Design for Additive Manufacturing

    Carolyn Conner Seepersad

  • The Validation Square: How Does One Verify and Validate a Design Method?

    Carolyn C. Seepersad;Kjartan Pedersen;Jan Emblemsvåg;Reid Bailey

  • Robust Design of Cellular Materials With Topological and Dimensional Imperfections

    Carolyn Conner Seepersad;Janet K. Allen;David L. McDowell;Farrokh Mistree

  • A Quantitative Approach for Designing Multiple Product Platforms for an Evolving Portfolio of Products

    Carolyn Conner Seepersad;Farrokh Mistree;Janet K. Allen

  • Decision support in concurrent engineering - The utility-based selection decision support problem

    Marco Gero Fernández;Carolyn Conner Seepersad;David W. Rosen;Janet K. Allen

  • A Designer's Guide for Dimensioning and Tolerancing SLS Parts

    Carolyn Conner Seepersad;Tyler Govett;Kevin Kim;Michael Lundin

  • Robust Design of Cellular Materials With Topological and Dimensional Imperfections

    Unknown

  • Impact behavior of negative stiffness honeycomb materials

    David A. Debeau;Carolyn C. Seepersad;Michael R. Haberman

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering opens doors to various specialized career paths. For those interested in accelerating their education, explore 5-year accelerated speech pathology programs as an example of how focused, intensive study can fast-track your professional journey.

Understanding salary expectations can help in career planning. For instance, an fbi profiler salary overview highlights how educational background influences earning potential in highly specialized roles outside engineering, but with transferable skills.

Many students consider careers in counseling alongside or following engineering studies. Knowing the type of counselors and their educational requirements can guide those exploring interdisciplinary opportunities.

For those looking for more flexible study options, examining the easiest counseling degree programs online might offer alternative career pathways that complement engineering expertise with strong communication and analytical skills.

Recently Published Articles