World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Carlos G. Puntonet

Carlos G. Puntonet

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
35
Citations
4419
World Ranking
11799
National Ranking
208

Carlos G. Puntonet publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Carlos G. Puntonet sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 293 publications — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Carlos G. Puntonet D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Carlos G. Puntonet sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 20th percentile

20% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Carlos G. Puntonet is a researcher affiliated with the University of Granada in Spain. Their research spans neuroscience and mathematics, with a particular focus on subfields such as cognitive neuroscience and geometry and topology.

The main topics covered in their work include:

  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Morphological variations and asymmetry

Throughout their career, Carlos G. Puntonet has contributed to academic literature with papers published primarily in the venue Neurocomputing. A notable recent publication is:

  • "A hypothesis-driven method based on machine learning for neuroimaging data analysis," published in 2022 in Neurocomputing.

Their collaborative network includes frequent coauthors such as:

  • J. M. Górriz
  • Rubén Martı́n-Clemente
  • Andrés Ortíz
  • Javier Ramírez
  • S. Savana Group

Their contributions reflect an interdisciplinary approach combining mathematical techniques with neuroscience data analysis. This is exemplified in their integration of machine learning methods for neuroimaging studies.

Best Publications

  • Brain connectivity analysis: a short survey

    E. W. Lang;A. M. Tomé;I. R. Keck;J. M. Górriz-Sáez

  • 18F-FDG PET imaging analysis for computer aided Alzheimer's diagnosis

    I. A. Illán;J. M. Górriz;J. Ramírez;D. Salas-Gonzalez

  • Empirical Mode Decomposition - an introduction

    A. Zeiler;R. Faltermeier;I. R. Keck;A. M. Tome

  • A Novel LMS Algorithm Applied to Adaptive Noise Cancellation

    J.M. Gorriz;J. Ramirez;S. Cruces-Alvarez;C.G. Puntonet

  • A Geometric Algorithm for Overcomplete Linear ICA

    Fabian J. Theis;Elmar Wolfgang Lang;Carlos García Puntonet

  • Computer Aided Diagnosis tool for Alzheimer's Disease based on Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon U-Test

    F.J. Martínez-Murcia;J.M. Górriz;J. Ramírez;C.G. Puntonet

  • Automatic tool for Alzheimer's disease diagnosis using PCA and Bayesian classification rules

    M. López;J. Ramírez;J.M. Górriz;D. Salas-Gonzalez

  • Alzheimer's Diagnosis Using Eigenbrains and Support Vector Machines

    I. Álvarez;J. M. Górriz;J. Ramírez;D. Salas-Gonzalez

  • Alzheimer's diagnosis using eigenbrains and support vector machines

    I. Álvarez;J.M. Górriz;J. Ramírez;D. Salas-Gonzalez

  • Digital image analysis for automatic enumeration of malaria parasites using morphological operations

    J.E. Arco;J.M. Górriz;J. Ramírez;I. Álvarez

  • Linear geometric ICA: fundamentals and algorithms

    Fabian J. Theis;Andreas Jung;Carlos G. Puntonet;Elmar W. Lang

  • Feature selection using factor analysis for Alzheimer's diagnosis using 18F-FDG PET images.

    D. Salas-Gonzalez;J. M. Górriz;J. Ramírez;I. A. Illán

  • Separation of sources: a geometry-based procedure for reconstruction of n-valued signals

    C. G. Puntonet;A. Prieto;C. Jutten;M. Rodríguez-Alvarez

  • Neural net approach for blind separation of sources based on geometric properties

    Carlos García Puntonet;Alberto Prieto

  • Association rule-based feature selection method for Alzheimer's disease diagnosis

    R. Chaves;J. RamíRez;J. M. GóRriz;C. G. Puntonet

  • Computer aided diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease using component based SVM

    I. A. Illán;J. M. Górriz;M. M. López;J. Ramírez

  • Computer-aided diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease using support vector machines and classification trees

    D Salas-Gonzalez;J M Górriz;J Ramírez;M López

  • Improved Gauss-Newton optimisation methods in affine registration of SPECT brain images

    D. Salas-Gonzalez;J. M. Gorriz;J. Ramirez;A. Lass

  • Automatic computer aided diagnosis tool using component-based SVM

    J. M. Gorriz;J. Ramirez;A. Lassl;D. Salas-Gonzalez

  • Ensemble of random forests One vs. Rest classifiers for MCI and AD prediction using ANOVA cortical and subcortical feature selection and partial least squares.

    J. Ramírez;J.M. Górriz;J.M. Górriz;A. Ortiz;F.J. Martínez-Murcia

  • Sparse nonnegative matrix factorization applied to microarray data sets

    K. Stadlthanner;F. J. Theis;E. W. Lang;A. M. Tomé

Frequent Co-Authors

Juan Manuel Górriz
Juan Manuel Górriz University of Granada
Elmar Lang
Elmar Lang University of Regensburg
Javier Ramírez
Javier Ramírez University of Granada
Fabian J. Theis
Fabian J. Theis Technical University of Munich
Diego Salas-Gonzalez
Diego Salas-Gonzalez University of Granada
Alberto Prieto
Alberto Prieto University of Granada
I. Álvarez
I. Álvarez University of Granada
Ignacio Rojas
Ignacio Rojas University of Granada
Deniz Erdogmus
Deniz Erdogmus Northeastern University
John Suckling
John Suckling University of Cambridge

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Deciding on the right degree can open up a range of career possibilities in computer science and related fields. For those looking to balance cost and career potential, exploring the affordable online master's programs can be a smart way to gain advanced technical knowledge without breaking the bank.

If you’re interested in leadership and management roles, pursuing an online doctorate leadership program may help you move into higher-level positions, both inside and outside of tech companies. For those seeking a faster entry into the workforce, there are easy associate degrees that pay well, offering valuable technical skills and a quick path to steady employment.

Finally, educators or professionals interested in academic leadership should look into the best online edd programs, which focus on educational leadership and administration. With so many online options, students can customize their learning journey to fit both their budget and career aspirations.

Best Scientists Citing Carlos G. Puntonet

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles