World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 31 11100 10384 5801 5293 69 6252

Bryan N. Cochran publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Bryan N. Cochran between 2000 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Bryan N. Cochran published across 25 years, from 2000 to 2024, averaging 2.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 10 publications in 2013. 3 of the 72 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2000 to 2024. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 10. Peak 10 publications in 2013. 2000: 2 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 5 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 0 publications 2006: 1 publication 2007: 3 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 2 publications 2010: 1 publication 2011: 1 publication 2012: 0 publications 2013: 10 publications 2014: 9 publications 2015: 8 publications 2016: 5 publications 2017: 3 publications 2018: 2 publications 2019: 0 publications 2020: 2 publications 2021: 3 publications 2022: 3 publications 2023: 1 publication 2024: 2 publications
2000 2024

72 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Bryan N. Cochran: publications per year, 2000 to 2024
Year Publications
2000 2
2001 0
2002 5
2003 4
2004 1
2005 0
2006 1
2007 3
2008 4
2009 2
2010 1
2011 1
2012 0
2013 10
2014 9
2015 8
2016 5
2017 3
2018 2
2019 0
2020 2
2021 3
2022 3
2023 1
2024 2
Total 72
Download as CSV

Bryan N. Cochran publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bryan N. Cochran sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 61–70 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 69 publications — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299 69
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Bryan N. Cochran D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bryan N. Cochran sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 30–31 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 31 D-Index — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398 31
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Bryan N. Cochran is affiliated with the University of Montana in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on psychology, with a particular emphasis on social psychology and gender studies. The range of their work includes topics related to LGBTQ health, identity, and policy, racial and ethnic identity research, gender, feminism, and media, as well as attachment and relationship dynamics.

The scientist has contributed to several papers in notable academic venues. Key recent publications include:

  • Real-time associations between discrimination and anxious and depressed mood among sexual and gender minorities: The moderating effects of lifetime victimization and identity concealment, 2020, published in Psychology of Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity
  • Inconcealable: A cognitive-behavioral model of concealment of gender and sexual identity and associations with physical and mental health, 2020, Psychology of Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity
  • Mental health providers' biases, knowledge, and treatment decision making with gender-minority clients, 2020, Psychology of Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity
  • The Availability of Sexual and Gender Minority (SGM) Specific Substance Use Services, 2022, Substance Use & Misuse
  • "For all the role asks of us, it gives us so much more": a descriptive study of gender and sexuality alliance advisors' usual practices, training experiences, and motivations, 2022, Journal of LGBT Youth

The frequent co-authors collaborating with Bryan N. Cochran include Kelly M. Davis, Kinsie Jean Dunham, James Michael Brennan, Morgan Bowlen, and Gabriella Ji. Their contributions appear consistently across multiple projects and publications.

Cochran's work has been published most frequently in the journal Psychology of Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity, followed by contributions in Substance Use & Misuse and the Journal of LGBT Youth. Other venues include the Online Journal of Rural Nursing and Health Care and Psychology in the Schools.

The main fields of study for Bryan N. Cochran center around psychology, with subfields encompassing social psychology, gender studies, sociology and political science, infectious diseases, and reproductive medicine.

The core topics of their research work include:

  • LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
  • Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
  • Gender, Feminism, and Media
  • Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Gender Roles and Identity Studies
  • HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
  • Reproductive Health and Technologies

Best Publications

  • Cultural and contextual influences in mental health help seeking: a focus on ethnic minority youth.

    Ana Mari Cauce;Melanie Domenech-Rodríguez;Matthew Paradise;Bryan N. Cochran

  • Challenges Faced by Homeless Sexual Minorities: Comparison of Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual, and Transgender Homeless Adolescents With Their Heterosexual Counterparts

    Bryan N. Cochran;Angela J. Stewart;Joshua A. Ginzler;Ana Mari Cauce

  • Offsetting risks: High school gay-straight alliances and lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) youth.

    Nicholas C. Heck;Annesa Flentje;Bryan N. Cochran

  • Prospective memory and aging: forgetting intentions over short delays.

    Gilles O. Einstein;Mark A. McDaniel;Marisa Manzi;Bryan Cochran

  • Victimization and posttraumatic stress disorder among homeless adolescents.

    Angela J. Stewart;Mandy Steiman;Ana Mari Cauce;Bryan N. Cochran

  • Overcoming the Odds? Adolescent Development in the Context of Urban Poverty

    Ana Mari Cauce;Angela Stewart;Melanie M. Domenech Rodríguez;Bryan Cochran

  • Characteristics of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender individuals entering substance abuse treatment.

    Bryan N. Cochran;Ana Mari Cauce

  • Mental Health Characteristics of Sexual Minority Veterans

    Bryan N. Cochran;Kimberly Balsam;Annesa Flentje;Carol A. Malte

  • Treatment choice for PTSD.

    Lori A. Zoellner;Norah C. Feeny;Bryan Cochran;Larry Pruitt

  • Factors predicting development of opioid use disorders among individuals who receive an initial opioid prescription: mathematical modeling using a database of commercially-insured individuals.

    Bryan N. Cochran;Annesa Flentje;Nicholas C. Heck;Jill Van Den Bos

  • Do specialized services exist for LGBT individuals seeking treatment for substance misuse? A study of available treatment programs.

    Bryan N. Cochran;K. Michelle Peavy;Jennifer S. Robohm

  • Ecological momentary assessment of daily discrimination experiences and nicotine, alcohol, and drug use among sexual and gender minority individuals.

    Nicholas A. Livingston;Annesa Flentje;Nicholas C. Heck;Allen Szalda-Petree

  • Reducing risk for illicit drug use and prescription drug misuse: High school gay-straight alliances and lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender youth

    Nicholas C. Heck;Nicholas C. Heck;Nicholas A. Livingston;Annesa Flentje;Kathryn Oost

  • Veterans administration health care utilization among sexual minority veterans.

    Tracy L. Simpson;Kimberly F. Balsam;Bryan N. Cochran;Keren Lehavot

  • Substance abuse treatment providers' explicit and implicit attitudes regarding sexual minorities.

    Bryan N. Cochran;K. Michelle Peavy;Ana Mari Cauce

  • Sequential Progression of Substance Use Among Homeless Youth: An Empirical Investigation of the Gateway Theory

    Joshua Aaron Ginzler;Bryan N. Cochran;Melanie Domenech-Rodríguez;Ana Mari Cauce

  • Cultural and contextual influences in mental health help seeking

    Ana Mari Cauce;Melanie Domenech-Rodríguez;Matthew Paradise;Bryan N. Cochran

  • Missing data in substance abuse research? Researchers' reporting practices of sexual orientation and gender identity.

    Annesa Flentje;Cristina L. Bacca;Bryan N. Cochran

  • Intake Interviewing with Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Clients: Starting from a Place of Affirmation

    Nicholas C. Heck;Annesa Flentje;Bryan N. Cochran

  • Therapeutic burnout among borderline personality disordered clients and their therapists: Development and evaluation of two adaptations of the maslach burnout inventory

    Marsha M. Linehan;Bryan N. Cochran;Corinne M. Mar;Eric R. Levensky

Frequent Co-Authors

Annesa Flentje
Annesa Flentje University of California, San Francisco
Ana Mari Cauce
Ana Mari Cauce University of Washington
Debra Srebnik
Debra Srebnik University of Washington
Kimberly F. Balsam
Kimberly F. Balsam Palo Alto University
Marsha M. Linehan
Marsha M. Linehan University of Washington
Norah C. Feeny
Norah C. Feeny Case Western Reserve University
Katherine Anne Comtois
Katherine Anne Comtois University of Washington
Lori A. Zoellner
Lori A. Zoellner University of Washington
Tracy L. Simpson
Tracy L. Simpson University of Washington
Les B. Whitbeck
Les B. Whitbeck University of Nebraska–Lincoln

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you're considering a career in psychology, exploring online degree programs can offer flexibility as you pursue your goals. Online degrees in psychology, counseling, or marriage and family therapy (MFT) can prepare you for diverse professional pathways.

For those interested in becoming marriage and family therapists, requirements can vary by location. Understanding how to become an mft in Reno, for example, may differ from the mft requirements in Richmond or how to become an mft in Riverside. Each state and even city may set its own academic, clinical, and licensing standards.

Researching specific pathways—such as learning about how to become an mft in Reno or how to become a marriage and family therapist in Sacramento—can help you identify program options and necessary qualifications.

No matter your location or specialty, online degree programs can provide the education and practical skills needed for licensure and career advancement in this rewarding field.

Best Scientists Citing Bryan N. Cochran

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles