World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Brock C. Christensen

Brock C. Christensen

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
56
Citations
16435
World Ranking
14195
National Ranking
5985

Brock C. Christensen publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Brock C. Christensen sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 262 publications — 70th percentile

70% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Brock C. Christensen D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Brock C. Christensen sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 56 D-Index — 28th percentile

28% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Brock C. Christensen is affiliated with Dartmouth College in the United States. Their research spans multiple intersecting disciplines with a primary focus on Biochemistry, Genetics, and Molecular Biology, as well as Medicine.

The main subfields of study in Christensen's body of work include Molecular Biology, Oncology, Cancer Research, Immunology, and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine. Their research topics cover a broad range related to cancer and molecular mechanisms, including Epigenetics and DNA Methylation, Single-cell and Spatial Transcriptomics, Artificial Intelligence applications in cancer detection, Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics, Immune Cells in Cancer, Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers, and Ferroptosis and Cancer Prognosis.

Christensen has authored numerous papers published in high-impact and specialized scientific journals. Among the recent works are:

  • Enhanced cell deconvolution of peripheral blood using DNA methylation for high-resolution immune profiling, 2022, Nature Communications
  • Silencing hepatic MCJ attenuates non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) by increasing mitochondrial fatty acid oxidation, 2020, Nature Communications
  • Phenotypic heterogeneity driven by plasticity of the intermediate EMT state governs disease progression and metastasis in breast cancer, 2022, Science Advances
  • MethylNet: an automated and modular deep learning approach for DNA methylation analysis, 2020, BMC Bioinformatics
  • Deciphering the role of immune cell composition in epigenetic age acceleration: Insights from cell-type deconvolution applied to human blood epigenetic clocks, 2023, Aging Cell

Frequent co-authors in Christensen's research network include Lucas A. Salas, Joshua Levy, Louis Vaickus, Karl T. Kelsey, and Devin C. Koestler. Collaborations with these scholars indicate active involvement in multi-author studies with significant publication output.

Christensen's publications often appear in prominent venues such as bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Cancer Research, Clinical Epigenetics, Epigenomics, and Epigenetics, signifying a strong presence in both preliminary preprint archives and peer-reviewed journals focused on cancer and epigenetics.

Best Publications

  • DNA methylation arrays as surrogate measures of cell mixture distribution

    Eugene Andres Houseman;William P Accomando;Devin C Koestler;Brock C Christensen

  • Aging and Environmental Exposures Alter Tissue-Specific DNA Methylation Dependent upon CpG Island Context

    Brock C. Christensen;E. Andres Houseman;E. Andres Houseman;Carmen J. Marsit;Shichun Zheng

  • DNA methylation aging clocks: challenges and recommendations

    Christopher G Bell;Robert Lowe;Peter D Adams;Peter D Adams;Andrea A Baccarelli

  • MicroRNA Expression Ratio Is Predictive of Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma

    Michele Avissar;Brock C. Christensen;Karl T. Kelsey;Carmen J. Marsit

  • An optimized library for reference-based deconvolution of whole-blood biospecimens assayed using the Illumina HumanMethylationEPIC BeadArray.

    Lucas A. Salas;Devin C. Koestler;Rondi A. Butler;Helen M. Hansen

  • DNA Methylation, Isocitrate Dehydrogenase Mutation, and Survival in Glioma

    Brock C. Christensen;Ashley A. Smith;Shichun Zheng;Devin C. Koestler

  • Blood-based profiles of DNA methylation predict the underlying distribution of cell types: a validation analysis.

    Devin C Koestler;Brock C Christensen;Margaret R Karagas;Carmen J Marsit

  • A let-7 microRNA-binding site polymorphism in the KRAS 3′ UTR is associated with reduced survival in oral cancers

    Brock C. Christensen;Benjamin J. Moyer;Michele Avissar;Lauren G. Ouellet

  • Model-based clustering of DNA methylation array data: a recursive-partitioning algorithm for high-dimensional data arising as a mixture of beta distributions

    E. Andres Houseman;E. Andres Houseman;Brock C. Christensen;Ru-Fang Yeh;Carmen J. Marsit

  • Maternal diet during pregnancy is related with the infant stool microbiome in a delivery mode-dependent manner

    Sara N. Lundgren;Juliette C. Madan;Juliette C. Madan;Jennifer A. Emond;Hilary G. Morrison

  • Review of processing and analysis methods for DNA methylation array data

    Charlotte Wilhelm-Benartzi;D. C. Koestler;M. R. Karagas;J. M. Flanagan

  • Genome-wide DNA methylation profiles in progression to in situ and invasive carcinoma of the breast with impact on gene transcription and prognosis

    Thomas Fleischer;Arnoldo Frigessi;Kevin C. Johnson;Hege Edvardsen

  • Breast Cancer DNA Methylation Profiles Are Associated with Tumor Size and Alcohol and Folate Intake

    Brock C. Christensen;Karl T. Kelsey;Shichun Zheng;E. Andres Houseman

  • Cell-type deconvolution from DNA methylation: a review of recent applications.

    Alexander J. Titus;Rachel M. Gallimore;Lucas A. Salas;Brock C. Christensen

  • Improving cell mixture deconvolution by identifying optimal DNA methylation libraries (IDOL).

    Devin C. Koestler;Meaghan J. Jones;Joseph Usset;Brock C. Christensen

  • Biomarkers of HPV in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

    Caihua Liang;Carmen J. Marsit;Michael D. McClean;Heather H. Nelson

  • Epigenetic profiles distinguish pleural mesothelioma from normal pleura and predict lung asbestos burden and clinical outcome

    Brock C. Christensen;E. A. Houseman;E. A. Houseman;E. A. Houseman;John J. Godleski;Carmen J. Marsit

  • Mature MicroRNA Sequence Polymorphism in MIR196A2 Is Associated with Risk and Prognosis of Head and Neck Cancer

    Brock C. Christensen;Michele Avissar-Whiting;Lauren G. Ouellet;Rondi A. Butler

  • Integrative DNA methylation and gene expression analyses identify DNA packaging and epigenetic regulatory genes associated with low motility sperm.

    Sara E. Pacheco;E. Andres Houseman;Brock C. Christensen;Carmen J. Marsit

  • Abstract 878: DNA methylation, isocitrate dehydrogenase mutation, and survival in glioma

    Brock C. Christensen;Ashley A. Smith;Shichun Zheng;Devin C. Koestler

Frequent Co-Authors

Karl T. Kelsey
Karl T. Kelsey Brown University
Carmen J. Marsit
Carmen J. Marsit Emory University
E. Andres Houseman
E. Andres Houseman Oregon State University
John K. Wiencke
John K. Wiencke University of California, San Francisco
Margaret R. Karagas
Margaret R. Karagas Dartmouth College
Margaret R. Wrensch
Margaret R. Wrensch University of California, San Francisco
Joseph L. Wiemels
Joseph L. Wiemels University of Southern California
David J. Sugarbaker
David J. Sugarbaker Baylor College of Medicine
Raphael Bueno
Raphael Bueno Brigham and Women's Hospital
Paige M. Bracci
Paige M. Bracci University of California, San Francisco

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Earning a degree in Biology or Biochemistry opens doors to a variety of advanced study options and career pathways in health and life sciences. Many students look for flexible learning options, and online degrees are becoming increasingly popular choices.

For those interested in advanced nursing roles but seeking a non-traditional path, an msn to dnp online no clinicals program offers a chance to progress without on-campus clinical requirements. If you are leaning toward leadership, a doctorate in healthcare administration online can prepare you for executive positions across healthcare systems and organizations.

Aspiring pharmacists might consider online pharm d programs, which combine science-focused coursework with the flexibility of distance learning. Alternatively, an exercise science degree online accredited can lead to diverse roles in fitness, research, and sports medicine.

Exploring accredited online degrees provides opportunities for specialization and career advancement without sacrificing convenience, making it easier than ever to pursue your scientific ambitions.

Best Scientists Citing Brock C. Christensen

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles