World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
89
Citations
29295
World Ranking
1145
National Ranking
127

Brian S. Meldrum publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Brian S. Meldrum sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 315 publications — 84th percentile

84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Brian S. Meldrum D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Brian S. Meldrum sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 89 D-Index — 88th percentile

88% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Brian S. Meldrum was affiliated with King's College London in the United Kingdom. Their research career involved academic work linked to this institution.

While there are no recorded recent papers, frequent co-authors, or publication venues associated with Brian S. Meldrum, the available data does not provide detailed insights into specific research topics or fields of study. There is also no information on main fields, subfields, or the main topics that the scientist investigated.

There is no record of book publications or awards linked to Brian S. Meldrum. The absence of further bibliographic and citation data limits the ability to characterize the research scope or impact comprehensively.

The scientist is deceased, and all references to their work reflect a past context.

Best Publications

  • Excitatory amino acid neurotoxicity and neurodegenerative disease

    Brian Meldrum;John Garthwaite

  • Glutamate as a Neurotransmitter in the Brain: Review of Physiology and Pathology

    Brian S. Meldrum

  • Molecular Targets for Antiepileptic Drug Development

    Brian S. Meldrum;Michael A. Rogawski

  • Possible therapeutic applications of antagonists of excitatory amino acid neurotransmitters.

    Unknown

  • Prolonged Epileptic Seizures in Primates

    Unknown

  • Calcium overload in selectively vulnerable neurons of the hippocampus during and after ischemia: an electron microscopy study in the rat.

    R. P. Simon;T. Griffiths;M. C. Evans;J. H. Swan

  • Epilepsy and γ-Aminobutyric Acid-Mediated Inhibition

    Unknown

  • Systemic Factors and Epileptic Brain Damage

    Unknown

  • Na+ channels as targets for neuroprotective drugs.

    Charles P. Taylor;Brian S. Meldrum

  • Mechanism of anticonvulsant action of valproate

    Unknown

  • Physiology of status epilepticus in primates.

    Unknown

  • CEREBRAL METABOLIC CHANGES DURING PROLONGED EPILEPTIC SEIZURES IN RATS

    Unknown

  • The non-NMDA antagonists, NBQX and GYKI 52466, protect against cortical and striatal cell loss following transient global ischaemia in the rat

    Eliane Le Pillet;Babak Arvin;Claudia Moncada;Brian S. Meldrum

  • Cerebral blood flow and metabolic rate early and late in prolonged epileptic seizures induced in rats by bicuculline.

    Unknown

  • An adenosine analogue, 2-chloroadenosine, protects against long term development of ischaemic cell loss in the rat hippocampus.

    M.C. Evans;J.H. Swan;B.S. Meldrum

  • The anticonvulsant effect of the non-NMDA antagonists, NBQX and GYKI 52466, in mice

    Astrid G. Chapman;Stuart E. Smith;Brian S. Meldrum

  • Kynurenate inhibition of cell excitation decreases stroke size and deficits

    Isabelle M. Germano;Lawrence H. Pitts;Brian S. Meldrum;Henry M. Bartkowski

  • Update on the Mechanism of Action of Antiepileptic Drugs

    Unknown

  • Antiepileptic action of excitatory amino acid antagonists in the photosensitive baboon, papio papio

    B.S. Meldrum;M.J. Croucher;G. Badman;J.F. Collins

  • Amino Acid Neurotransmitters and New Approaches to Anticonvulsant Drug Action

    Brian Meldrum

  • The non-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonists, GYKI 52466 and NBQX are anticonvulsant in two animal models of reflex epilepsy.

    Stuart E. Smith;Nick Durmuller;Brian S. Meldrum

  • Intracellular calcium accumulation in rat hippocampus during seizures induced by bicuculline or L-allylglycine.

    T. Griffiths;M.C. Evans;B.S. Meldrum

  • Protection by NMDA antagonists against selective cell loss following transient ischaemia.

    Jeanette H. Swan;Brian S. Meldrum

  • Glutamate metabotropic receptors as targets for drug therapy in epilepsy

    Randall Xavier Moldrich;Astrid G Chapman;Giovambattista De Sarro;Brian S Meldrum

  • Induction of audiogenic seizure susceptibility by focal infusion of excitant amino acid or bicuculline into the inferior colliculus of normal rats.

    Maria H. Millan;Brian S. Meldrum;Carl L. Faingold

  • Anticonvulsant activity of two metabotropic glutamate group I antagonists selective for the mGlu5 receptor: 2-methyl-6-(phenylethynyl)-pyridine (MPEP), and (E)-6-methyl-2-styryl-pyridine (SIB 1893).

    Astrid G Chapman;Karl Nanan;Martin Williams;Brian S Meldrum

  • Excitatory neurotransmission within substantia nigra pars reticulata regulates threshold for seizures produced by pilocarpine in rats: effects of intranigral 2-amino-7-phosphonoheptanoate and N-methyl-D-aspartate.

    L. Turski;E.A. Cavalheiro;W.A. Turski;B.S. Meldrum

  • Effects of fetal hippocampal field grafts on ischaemic-induced deficits in spatial navigation in the water maze.

    C.A. Netto;H. Hodges;J.D. Sinden;E. Le Peillet

  • Cerebroprotective Effect of Lamotrigine After Focal Ischemia in Rats

    Stuart E. Smith;Brian S. Meldrum

  • 9. Excitotoxicity and epileptic brain damage

    Brian Meldrum

Frequent Co-Authors

Daniel Tarsy
Daniel Tarsy Harvard Medical School
Carlos Alexandre Netto
Carlos Alexandre Netto Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul
Helen Hodges
Helen Hodges ReNeuron (United Kingdom)
Jeffrey A. Gray
Jeffrey A. Gray King's College London
Charles David Marsden
Charles David Marsden King's College London
Carl L. Faingold
Carl L. Faingold Southern Illinois University School of Medicine
Ryder P. Gwinn
Ryder P. Gwinn Evergreen Health Medical Center
Alba Chimirri
Alba Chimirri University of Messina
Steven H. Graham
Steven H. Graham University of Pittsburgh
Michael Schwarz
Michael Schwarz Flinders University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring neuroscience opens up a world of dynamic career options, and online education now provides flexible routes to get there. Many students consider accelerated degree programs to fast-track their studies, allowing them to earn a degree and start working in the field sooner.

When deciding on your path, it’s important to look at potential returns. Some neuroscience-related tracks are among the best degree in the world when it comes to salary and career outlook. In fact, neuroscience overlaps with areas included in the most lucrative college degrees, especially if you branch into fields such as biotechnology, pharmacology, or medicine.

Budget is also a key consideration. Fortunately, there are cheapest online colleges that accept FAFSA, making neuroscience degrees and related pathways more accessible than ever.

Best Scientists Citing Brian S. Meldrum