World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Bradley G. Goodyear

Bradley G. Goodyear

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Neuroscience 41 7856 7251 465 425 150 6784

Bradley G. Goodyear publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Bradley G. Goodyear between 1997 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Bradley G. Goodyear published across 29 years, from 1997 to 2025, averaging 5.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 14 publications in 2014. 13 of the 169 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1997 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 14. Peak 14 publications in 2014. 1997: 1 publication 1998: 5 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 2 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 3 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 1 publication 2007: 4 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 2 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 14 publications 2015: 8 publications 2016: 12 publications 2017: 13 publications 2018: 9 publications 2019: 6 publications 2020: 6 publications 2021: 13 publications 2022: 8 publications 2023: 10 publications 2024: 7 publications 2025: 6 publications
1997 2025

169 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Bradley G. Goodyear: publications per year, 1997 to 2025
Year Publications
1997 1
1998 5
1999 1
2000 2
2001 3
2002 1
2003 3
2004 3
2005 2
2006 1
2007 4
2008 6
2009 4
2010 2
2011 6
2012 7
2013 6
2014 14
2015 8
2016 12
2017 13
2018 9
2019 6
2020 6
2021 13
2022 8
2023 10
2024 7
2025 6
Total 169
Download as CSV

Bradley G. Goodyear publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bradley G. Goodyear sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 887+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 539. Most scientists, 539, have 98–107 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 148–157 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientist 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 887+

This scientist: 150 publications — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 18
48–57 79
58–67 193
68–77 323
78–87 406
88–97 452
98–107 539
108–117 505
118–127 522
128–137 469
138–147 456
148–157 459 150
158–167 397
168–177 383
178–187 350
188–197 302
198–207 306
208–217 262
218–227 242
228–237 220
238–247 203
248–257 174
258–267 176
268–277 175
278–287 125
288–297 116
298–307 127
308–317 128
318–327 99
328–337 89
338–347 78
348–357 96
358–367 66
368–377 59
378–387 65
388–397 54
398–407 48
408–417 49
418–427 34
428–437 31
438–447 30
448–457 31
458–467 36
468–477 40
478–487 35
488–497 30
498–507 23
508–517 26
518–527 20
528–537 23
538–547 20
548–557 20
558–567 17
568–577 14
578–587 20
588–597 20
598–607 19
608–617 18
618–627 17
628–637 11
638–647 11
648–657 11
658–667 8
668–677 7
678–687 11
688–697 10
698–707 4
708–717 6
718–727 5
728–737 5
738–747 9
748–757 9
758–767 3
768–777 7
778–787 7
788–797 6
798–807 2
808–817 2
818–827 7
828–837 0
838–847 9
848–857 3
858–867 1
868–877 3
878–886 6
887+ 100
Download as CSV

Bradley G. Goodyear D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bradley G. Goodyear sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 68 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 163+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 512. Most scientists, 512, have 46–47 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 40–41 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30–31 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 42
32–33 172
34–35 296
36–37 435
38–39 459
40–41 456 41
42–43 467
44–45 478
46–47 512
48–49 435
50–51 425
52–53 418
54–55 392
56–57 357
58–59 334
60–61 328
62–63 260
64–65 278
66–67 239
68–69 250
70–71 210
72–73 200
74–75 189
76–77 170
78–79 146
80–81 113
82–83 126
84–85 100
86–87 84
88–89 99
90–91 84
92–93 85
94–95 72
96–97 76
98–99 45
100–101 49
102–103 43
104–105 32
106–107 45
108–109 50
110–111 32
112–113 39
114–115 32
116–117 29
118–119 27
120–121 19
122–123 23
124–125 27
126–127 16
128–129 24
130–131 13
132–133 21
134–135 17
136–137 14
138–139 15
140–141 10
142–143 10
144–145 13
146–147 9
148–149 8
150–151 6
152–153 6
154–155 7
156–157 7
158–159 10
160–161 4
162 8
163+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Bradley G. Goodyear is affiliated with the University of Calgary in Canada. Their research spans multiple domains within medicine and neuroscience, contributing to an extensive body of work that focuses on brain function and imaging technologies.

The scientist's recent publications cover a range of topics including neuroimaging in neurological and psychiatric conditions. Notable papers include:

  • "Accelerated cortical thinning precedes and predicts conversion to psychosis: The NAPLS3 longitudinal study of youth at clinical high-risk," 2022, Molecular Psychiatry
  • "Functional connectivity and mild behavioral impairment in dementia-free elderly," 2023, Alzheimer's & Dementia Translational Research & Clinical Interventions
  • "Cross-sectional and longitudinal differences in peak skeletonized white matter mean diffusivity in cerebral amyloid angiopathy," 2020, NeuroImage Clinical
  • "Cerebrovascular reactivity in cerebral amyloid angiopathy, Alzheimer disease, and mild cognitive impairment," 2020, Neurology
  • "Multimodal Brain MRI of Deep Gray Matter Changes Associated With Inflammatory Bowel Disease," 2022, Inflammatory Bowel Diseases

Their collaboration network includes frequent co-authors such as Keith Owen Yeates, Miriam H. Beauchamp, Quynh Doan, Roger Zemek, and William Craig, reflecting interdisciplinary work involving clinical and neuroimaging research.

Bradley G. Goodyear frequently publishes in venues with a focus on neurology and brain mapping. Key publication venues include:

  • Neurology
  • Human Brain Mapping
  • Epilepsia
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • UNC Libraries

The main fields of study for Bradley's research are Medicine and Neuroscience, supported by numerous publications. Their subfields cover:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
  • Neurology
  • Epidemiology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

The primary topics addressed in their work include:

  • Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
  • EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Neural dynamics and brain function

Best Publications

  • Cerebral cortical representation of automatic and volitional swallowing in humans.

    Ruth E. Martin;Bradley G. Goodyear;Joseph S. Gati;Ravi S. Menon;Ravi S. Menon

  • Cue-induced brain activity in pathological gamblers.

    David N. Crockford;Bradley Goodyear;Jodi Edwards;Jeremy Quickfall

  • Association of Thalamic Dysconnectivity and Conversion to Psychosis in Youth and Young Adults at Elevated Clinical Risk

    Alan Anticevic;Kristen Haut;John D. Murray;Grega Repovs

  • Magnetic resonance imaging at 3.0 Tesla: challenges and advantages in clinical neurological imaging.

    Richard Frayne;Bradley G Goodyear;Peter Dickhoff;M Louis Lauzon

  • Longitudinal Evaluation of Resting-State fMRI After Acute Stroke With Hemiparesis

    Ali-Mohammad Golestani;Sarah Tymchuk;Andrew Demchuk;Bradley G. Goodyear

  • Cerebello-thalamo-cortical hyperconnectivity as a state-independent functional neural signature for psychosis prediction and characterization.

    Hengyi Cao;Oliver Y. Chén;Yoonho Chung;Jennifer K. Forsyth

  • Functional connectivity of neural motor networks is disrupted in children with developmental coordination disorder and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.

    Kevin R. McLeod;Lisa Marie Langevin;Bradley G. Goodyear;Deborah Dewey

  • Submillimeter functional localization in human striate cortex using BOLD contrast at 4 Tesla: implications for the vascular point-spread function.

    Ravi S. Menon;Ravi S. Menon;Bradley G. Goodyear

  • Neural Correlates of Concreteness in Semantic Categorization

    Penny M. Pexman;Ian S. Hargreaves;Jodi D. Edwards;Luke C. Henry

  • Multisite reliability of MR-based functional connectivity.

    Stephanie Noble;Dustin Scheinost;Emily S. Finn;Xilin Shen

  • Reduced intrinsic connectivity of amygdala in adults with major depressive disorder.

    Rajamannar Ramasubbu;Nithya Konduru;Filomeno Cortese;Signe Bray

  • Brief visual stimulation allows mapping of ocular dominance in visual cortex using fMRI.

    Bradley G. Goodyear;Ravi S. Menon

  • BOLD fMRI Response of Early Visual Areas to Perceived Contrast in Human Amblyopia

    Bradley G. Goodyear;Bradley G. Goodyear;David A. Nicolle;G. Keith Humphrey;Ravi S. Menon;Ravi S. Menon

  • Neurovascular decoupling is associated with severity of cerebral amyloid angiopathy

    Stefano Peca;Cheryl R. McCreary;Emily Donaldson;Gopukumar Kumarpillai

  • Neural correlates of pathological gamblers preference for immediate rewards during the iowa gambling task: an fMRI study.

    Yuri Power;Bradley Goodyear;David Crockford

  • Effect of Luminance Contrast on BOLD fMRI Response in Human Primary Visual Areas

    Bradley G. Goodyear;Ravi S. Menon;Ravi S. Menon

  • Simultaneous 3-T fMRI and high-density recording of human auditory evoked potentials.

    Carrie J. Scarff;Angela Reynolds;Bradley G. Goodyear;Curtis W. Ponton

  • The Neural Consequences of Semantic Richness When More Comes to Mind, Less Activation Is Observed

    Penny M. Pexman;Ian S. Hargreaves;Jodi D. Edwards;Luke C. Henry

  • Accelerated cortical thinning precedes and predicts conversion to psychosis: The NAPLS3 longitudinal study of youth at clinical high-risk

    Unknown

  • Reliability of an fMRI paradigm for emotional processing in a multisite longitudinal study

    Dylan G. Gee;Sarah C. McEwen;Jennifer K. Forsyth;Kristen M. Haut

  • High resolution fMRI of ocular dominance columns within the visual cortex of human amblyopes.

    Bradley G. Goodyear;David A. Nicolle;Ravi S. Menon

Frequent Co-Authors

Ravi S. Menon
Ravi S. Menon University of Western Ontario
Glenda MacQueen
Glenda MacQueen University of Calgary
Eric E. Smith
Eric E. Smith University of Calgary
Catherine Lebel
Catherine Lebel University of Calgary
Carrie E. Bearden
Carrie E. Bearden University of California, Los Angeles
Penny M. Pexman
Penny M. Pexman University of Calgary
Stephan Hamann
Stephan Hamann Emory University
Elaine F. Walker
Elaine F. Walker Emory University
Scott W. Woods
Scott W. Woods Yale University
Diana O. Perkins
Diana O. Perkins University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you're interested in neuroscience, there are several related fields and online degree options to consider. Pursuing advanced study in mental health or counseling, for example, offers a strong foundation for understanding the human brain and behavior. For those looking to make a quick impact in social work, explore msw programs which can prepare you for roles supporting individuals and communities.

Psychology is another well-connected discipline. With a variety of accelerated psychology degree programs now available online, you can quickly build your expertise in mental processes and clinical techniques.

If your interest lies in professional counseling, consider the best online cacrep counseling programs, which meet respected accreditation standards and can deepen your understanding of neurobehavioral health. For those seeking flexible and cost-effective options, learn about affordable online masters counseling programs to launch or advance your career.

Exploring these online degrees alongside neuroscience can expand your career prospects in healthcare, education, research, and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Bradley G. Goodyear

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles