World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Bradley G. Goodyear

Bradley G. Goodyear

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
41
Citations
6784
World Ranking
7856
National Ranking
465

Bradley G. Goodyear publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bradley G. Goodyear sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 150 publications — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Bradley G. Goodyear D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bradley G. Goodyear sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Bradley G. Goodyear is affiliated with the University of Calgary in Canada. Their research spans multiple domains within medicine and neuroscience, contributing to an extensive body of work that focuses on brain function and imaging technologies.

The scientist's recent publications cover a range of topics including neuroimaging in neurological and psychiatric conditions. Notable papers include:

  • "Accelerated cortical thinning precedes and predicts conversion to psychosis: The NAPLS3 longitudinal study of youth at clinical high-risk," 2022, Molecular Psychiatry
  • "Functional connectivity and mild behavioral impairment in dementia-free elderly," 2023, Alzheimer's & Dementia Translational Research & Clinical Interventions
  • "Cross-sectional and longitudinal differences in peak skeletonized white matter mean diffusivity in cerebral amyloid angiopathy," 2020, NeuroImage Clinical
  • "Cerebrovascular reactivity in cerebral amyloid angiopathy, Alzheimer disease, and mild cognitive impairment," 2020, Neurology
  • "Multimodal Brain MRI of Deep Gray Matter Changes Associated With Inflammatory Bowel Disease," 2022, Inflammatory Bowel Diseases

Their collaboration network includes frequent co-authors such as Keith Owen Yeates, Miriam H. Beauchamp, Quynh Doan, Roger Zemek, and William Craig, reflecting interdisciplinary work involving clinical and neuroimaging research.

Bradley G. Goodyear frequently publishes in venues with a focus on neurology and brain mapping. Key publication venues include:

  • Neurology
  • Human Brain Mapping
  • Epilepsia
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • UNC Libraries

The main fields of study for Bradley's research are Medicine and Neuroscience, supported by numerous publications. Their subfields cover:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
  • Neurology
  • Epidemiology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

The primary topics addressed in their work include:

  • Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
  • EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Neural dynamics and brain function

Best Publications

  • Cerebral cortical representation of automatic and volitional swallowing in humans.

    Ruth E. Martin;Bradley G. Goodyear;Joseph S. Gati;Ravi S. Menon;Ravi S. Menon

  • Cue-induced brain activity in pathological gamblers.

    David N. Crockford;Bradley Goodyear;Jodi Edwards;Jeremy Quickfall

  • Association of Thalamic Dysconnectivity and Conversion to Psychosis in Youth and Young Adults at Elevated Clinical Risk

    Alan Anticevic;Kristen Haut;John D. Murray;Grega Repovs

  • Magnetic resonance imaging at 3.0 Tesla: challenges and advantages in clinical neurological imaging.

    Richard Frayne;Bradley G Goodyear;Peter Dickhoff;M Louis Lauzon

  • Longitudinal Evaluation of Resting-State fMRI After Acute Stroke With Hemiparesis

    Ali-Mohammad Golestani;Sarah Tymchuk;Andrew Demchuk;Bradley G. Goodyear

  • Cerebello-thalamo-cortical hyperconnectivity as a state-independent functional neural signature for psychosis prediction and characterization.

    Hengyi Cao;Oliver Y. Chén;Yoonho Chung;Jennifer K. Forsyth

  • Functional connectivity of neural motor networks is disrupted in children with developmental coordination disorder and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.

    Kevin R. McLeod;Lisa Marie Langevin;Bradley G. Goodyear;Deborah Dewey

  • Submillimeter functional localization in human striate cortex using BOLD contrast at 4 Tesla: implications for the vascular point-spread function.

    Ravi S. Menon;Ravi S. Menon;Bradley G. Goodyear

  • Neural Correlates of Concreteness in Semantic Categorization

    Penny M. Pexman;Ian S. Hargreaves;Jodi D. Edwards;Luke C. Henry

  • Multisite reliability of MR-based functional connectivity.

    Stephanie Noble;Dustin Scheinost;Emily S. Finn;Xilin Shen

  • Reduced intrinsic connectivity of amygdala in adults with major depressive disorder.

    Rajamannar Ramasubbu;Nithya Konduru;Filomeno Cortese;Signe Bray

  • Brief visual stimulation allows mapping of ocular dominance in visual cortex using fMRI.

    Bradley G. Goodyear;Ravi S. Menon

  • BOLD fMRI Response of Early Visual Areas to Perceived Contrast in Human Amblyopia

    Bradley G. Goodyear;Bradley G. Goodyear;David A. Nicolle;G. Keith Humphrey;Ravi S. Menon;Ravi S. Menon

  • Neurovascular decoupling is associated with severity of cerebral amyloid angiopathy

    Stefano Peca;Cheryl R. McCreary;Emily Donaldson;Gopukumar Kumarpillai

  • Neural correlates of pathological gamblers preference for immediate rewards during the iowa gambling task: an fMRI study.

    Yuri Power;Bradley Goodyear;David Crockford

  • Effect of Luminance Contrast on BOLD fMRI Response in Human Primary Visual Areas

    Bradley G. Goodyear;Ravi S. Menon;Ravi S. Menon

  • Simultaneous 3-T fMRI and high-density recording of human auditory evoked potentials.

    Carrie J. Scarff;Angela Reynolds;Bradley G. Goodyear;Curtis W. Ponton

  • The Neural Consequences of Semantic Richness When More Comes to Mind, Less Activation Is Observed

    Penny M. Pexman;Ian S. Hargreaves;Jodi D. Edwards;Luke C. Henry

  • Accelerated cortical thinning precedes and predicts conversion to psychosis: The NAPLS3 longitudinal study of youth at clinical high-risk

    Unknown

  • Reliability of an fMRI paradigm for emotional processing in a multisite longitudinal study

    Dylan G. Gee;Sarah C. McEwen;Jennifer K. Forsyth;Kristen M. Haut

  • High resolution fMRI of ocular dominance columns within the visual cortex of human amblyopes.

    Bradley G. Goodyear;David A. Nicolle;Ravi S. Menon

Frequent Co-Authors

Ravi S. Menon
Ravi S. Menon University of Western Ontario
Glenda MacQueen
Glenda MacQueen University of Calgary
Eric E. Smith
Eric E. Smith University of Calgary
Catherine Lebel
Catherine Lebel University of Calgary
Carrie E. Bearden
Carrie E. Bearden University of California, Los Angeles
Penny M. Pexman
Penny M. Pexman University of Calgary
Stephan Hamann
Stephan Hamann Emory University
Elaine F. Walker
Elaine F. Walker Emory University
Scott W. Woods
Scott W. Woods Yale University
Diana O. Perkins
Diana O. Perkins University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you're interested in neuroscience, there are several related fields and online degree options to consider. Pursuing advanced study in mental health or counseling, for example, offers a strong foundation for understanding the human brain and behavior. For those looking to make a quick impact in social work, explore msw programs which can prepare you for roles supporting individuals and communities.

Psychology is another well-connected discipline. With a variety of accelerated psychology degree programs now available online, you can quickly build your expertise in mental processes and clinical techniques.

If your interest lies in professional counseling, consider the best online cacrep counseling programs, which meet respected accreditation standards and can deepen your understanding of neurobehavioral health. For those seeking flexible and cost-effective options, learn about affordable online masters counseling programs to launch or advance your career.

Exploring these online degrees alongside neuroscience can expand your career prospects in healthcare, education, research, and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Bradley G. Goodyear

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles