World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Mathematics

D-Index
38
Citations
8840
World Ranking
2293
National Ranking
969

Boris Freidlin publications per year

1994: 1 publications 1995: 2 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 1 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 5 publications 2000: 8 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 7 publications 2003: 6 publications 2004: 5 publications 2005: 8 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 7 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 7 publications 2011: 8 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 11 publications 2014: 9 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 4 publications 2017: 9 publications 2018: 4 publications 2019: 4 publications 2020: 9 publications 2021: 4 publications 2022: 11 publications 2023: 12 publications 2024: 11 publications 2025: 6 publications 2026: 1 publications
1994 2026

196 publications in total across all disciplines

Boris Freidlin publication distribution in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mathematics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Boris Freidlin sits on this spectrum.

42–46 publications: 3 scientists 47–51 publications: 5 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 20 scientists 62–66 publications: 14 scientists 67–71 publications: 25 scientists 72–76 publications: 19 scientists 77–81 publications: 35 scientists 82–86 publications: 50 scientists 87–91 publications: 60 scientists 92–96 publications: 86 scientists 97–101 publications: 84 scientists 102–106 publications: 83 scientists 107–111 publications: 90 scientists 112–116 publications: 99 scientists 117–121 publications: 90 scientists 122–126 publications: 91 scientists 127–131 publications: 109 scientists 132–136 publications: 110 scientists 137–141 publications: 98 scientists 142–146 publications: 112 scientists 147–151 publications: 102 scientists 152–156 publications: 88 scientists 157–161 publications: 106 scientists 162–166 publications: 83 scientists 167–171 publications: 102 scientists 172–176 publications: 77 scientists 177–181 publications: 81 scientists 182–186 publications: 78 scientists 187–191 publications: 71 scientists 192–196 publications: 92 scientists 197–201 publications: 64 scientists 202–206 publications: 69 scientists 207–211 publications: 64 scientists 212–216 publications: 62 scientists 217–221 publications: 58 scientists 222–226 publications: 53 scientists 227–231 publications: 50 scientists 232–236 publications: 46 scientists 237–241 publications: 46 scientists 242–246 publications: 46 scientists 247–251 publications: 43 scientists 252–256 publications: 29 scientists 257–261 publications: 45 scientists 262–266 publications: 30 scientists 267–271 publications: 33 scientists 272–276 publications: 34 scientists 277–281 publications: 30 scientists 282–286 publications: 31 scientists 287–291 publications: 21 scientists 292–296 publications: 34 scientists 297–301 publications: 26 scientists 302–306 publications: 10 scientists 307–311 publications: 17 scientists 312–316 publications: 23 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 16 scientists 327–331 publications: 26 scientists 332–336 publications: 13 scientists 337–341 publications: 13 scientists 342–346 publications: 16 scientists 347–351 publications: 17 scientists 352–356 publications: 12 scientists 357–361 publications: 18 scientists 362–366 publications: 18 scientists 367–371 publications: 9 scientists 372–376 publications: 11 scientists 377–381 publications: 8 scientists 382–386 publications: 8 scientists 387–391 publications: 9 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 8 scientists 402–406 publications: 11 scientists 407–411 publications: 6 scientists 412–416 publications: 6 scientists 417–421 publications: 9 scientists 422–426 publications: 8 scientists 427–431 publications: 5 scientists 432–436 publications: 8 scientists 437–441 publications: 8 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 4 scientists 452–456 publications: 4 scientists 457–461 publications: 2 scientists 462–466 publications: 2 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 3 scientists 477–481 publications: 3 scientists 482–486 publications: 6 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 5 scientists 502–506 publications: 1 scientists 507–511 publications: 6 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 1 scientists 522–526 publications: 3 scientists 527–531 publications: 1 scientists 532–536 publications: 4 scientists 537+ publications: 100 scientists
42 publications 537+

This scientist: 131 publications — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 537 publications or more.

Boris Freidlin D-index placement in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mathematics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Boris Freidlin sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 174 scientists 31 D-Index: 151 scientists 32 D-Index: 174 scientists 33 D-Index: 117 scientists 34 D-Index: 136 scientists 35 D-Index: 127 scientists 36 D-Index: 145 scientists 37 D-Index: 153 scientists 38 D-Index: 150 scientists 39 D-Index: 150 scientists 40 D-Index: 138 scientists 41 D-Index: 136 scientists 42 D-Index: 93 scientists 43 D-Index: 108 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 112 scientists 46 D-Index: 103 scientists 47 D-Index: 75 scientists 48 D-Index: 59 scientists 49 D-Index: 67 scientists 50 D-Index: 60 scientists 51 D-Index: 57 scientists 52 D-Index: 59 scientists 53 D-Index: 62 scientists 54 D-Index: 60 scientists 55 D-Index: 50 scientists 56 D-Index: 42 scientists 57 D-Index: 54 scientists 58 D-Index: 50 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 41 scientists 61 D-Index: 35 scientists 62 D-Index: 40 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 31 scientists 65 D-Index: 27 scientists 66 D-Index: 29 scientists 67 D-Index: 19 scientists 68 D-Index: 25 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 18 scientists 71 D-Index: 12 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 13 scientists 74 D-Index: 18 scientists 75 D-Index: 9 scientists 76 D-Index: 11 scientists 77 D-Index: 10 scientists 78 D-Index: 9 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 10 scientists 82 D-Index: 5 scientists 83 D-Index: 5 scientists 84 D-Index: 13 scientists 85 D-Index: 6 scientists 86+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 86+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 86 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Eligibility and Response Guidelines for Phase II Clinical Trials in Androgen-Independent Prostate Cancer: Recommendations From the Prostate-Specific Antigen Working Group

    Glenn J. Bubley;Michael Carducci;William Dahut;Nancy Dawson

  • Accelerated Titration Designs for Phase I Clinical Trials in Oncology

    Richard Simon;Boris Freidlin;Larry Rubinstein;Susan G. Arbuck

  • Twenty-Two Years of Phase III Trials for Patients With Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Sobering Results

    Oscar S. Breathnach;Boris Freidlin;Barbara Conley;Mark R. Green

  • Trend tests for case-control studies of genetic markers: power, sample size and robustness.

    Boris Freidlin;Gang Zheng;Zhaohai Li;Joseph L. Gastwirth

  • Randomized Clinical Trials With Biomarkers: Design Issues

    Boris Freidlin;Lisa M. McShane;Edward L. Korn

  • Design Issues of Randomized Phase II Trials and a Proposal for Phase II Screening Trials

    Lawrence V. Rubinstein;Edward L. Korn;Boris Freidlin;Sally Hunsberger

  • Adaptive Signature Design: An Adaptive Clinical Trial Design for Generating and Prospectively Testing A Gene Expression Signature for Sensitive Patients

    Unknown

  • Biomarker-adaptive threshold design: a procedure for evaluating treatment with possible biomarker-defined subset effect.

    Wenyu Jiang;Boris Freidlin;Richard Simon

  • Outcome-Adaptive Randomization: Is It Useful?

    Edward L. Korn;Boris Freidlin

  • The Cross-Validated Adaptive Signature Design

    Boris Freidlin;Wenyu Jiang;Richard Simon

  • Biomarker enrichment strategies: matching trial design to biomarker credentials

    Boris Freidlin;Edward L. Korn

  • Blinded Independent Central Review of Progression-Free Survival in Phase III Clinical Trials: Important Design Element or Unnecessary Expense?

    Lori E. Dodd;Edward L. Korn;Boris Freidlin;C. Carl Jaffe

  • Multi-Arm Clinical Trials of New Agents: Some Design Considerations

    Boris Freidlin;Edward L. Korn;Robert Gray;Alison Martin

  • Statistical and Practical Considerations for Clinical Evaluation of Predictive Biomarkers

    Mei Yin C. Polley;Boris Freidlin;Edward L. Korn;Barbara A. Conley

  • Overall Survival As the Outcome for Randomized Clinical Trials With Effective Subsequent Therapies

    Edward L. Korn;Boris Freidlin;Jeffrey S. Abrams

  • Robust Genomic Control for Association Studies

    Gang Zheng;Boris Freidlin;Joseph L. Gastwirth

  • Randomized Phase II Trial Designs With Biomarkers

    Boris Freidlin;Lisa M. McShane;Mei Yin C. Polley;Edward L. Korn

  • Should the Median Test be Retired from General Use

    Boris Freidlin;Joseph L. Gastwirth

  • Choice of scores in trend tests for case-control studies of candidate-gene associations

    Gang Zheng;Boris Freidlin;Zhaohai Li;Joseph L. Gastwirth

  • Borrowing Information across Subgroups in Phase II Trials: Is It Useful?

    Boris Freidlin;Edward L. Korn

Frequent Co-Authors

Joseph L. Gastwirth
Joseph L. Gastwirth George Washington University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Mathematics, pursuing related online degrees can open diverse career pathways. For example, many choose to enhance their business acumen by enrolling in 12 month mba programs. These accelerated programs provide a fast track to leadership roles while leveraging strong quantitative skills.

Another consideration is credit transferability. If you've started an MBA elsewhere, it’s useful to explore options that allow can you transfer mba credits. This flexibility helps students save time and tuition costs by applying previous coursework towards their degree.

Beyond business, mathematics graduates often pivot to data-intensive fields like analytics. Some of the best masters in data analytics programs capitalize on mathematical reasoning and statistical knowledge to prepare students for in-demand roles.

If accessibility is key, students might explore the mba programs easy to get into as a gateway to flexible, less competitive online education. These programs can be a practical choice for math professionals seeking business credentials without extensive admissions barriers.

Best Scientists Citing Boris Freidlin

Recently Published Articles