World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
31
Citations
4540
World Ranking
9572
National Ranking
800

Bernd Sutor publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bernd Sutor sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 69 publications — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Bernd Sutor D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bernd Sutor sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 31 D-Index — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Bernd Sutor is affiliated with Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München in Germany. Their research spans multiple areas within neuroscience and molecular biology, with a focus on how molecular mechanisms influence neural function and brain dynamics.

The scientist has published work primarily in the fields of Neuroscience and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology. Their subfields of study include Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, and Cognitive Neuroscience.

Research topics addressed in their publications include:

  • Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • RNA Research and Splicing
  • RNA modifications and cancer
  • RNA regulation and disease
  • Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling
  • Photoreceptor and optogenetics research

Recent papers authored or coauthored by Bernd Sutor include:

  • "Pumilio2 and Staufen2 selectively balance the synaptic proteome," 2021, Cell Reports
  • "Cell-Type-Specific Effects of Somatostatin on Synaptic Transmission in the Anterior Cingulate Cortex," 2024, Journal of Neuroscience
  • "Cell-type specific effects of somatostatin on corticocortical information processing in the anterior cingulate cortex," 2022, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • "Dipl. Ing. univ. Hans Reiner Polder," 2020, Neuroforum
  • "Ökophysiologie und Naturschutzphysiologie - Anwendung von physiologischen Konzepten, Techniken und Wissen im praktischen Naturschutz," 2022, Naturschutz und Landschaftsplanung (NuL)

The venues where their research is frequently published include:

  • Cell Reports
  • Journal of Neuroscience
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Neuroforum
  • Naturschutz und Landschaftsplanung (NuL)

Bernd Sutor collaborates with several researchers regularly, including:

  • Therese Riedemann
  • Rico Schieweck
  • Ignasi Forné
  • Max Harner
  • Karl E. Bauer

Best Publications

  • Functional Properties of Neurons Derived from In Vitro Reprogrammed Postnatal Astroglia

    Benedikt Berninger;Marcos R. Costa;Ursula Koch;Timm Schroeder

  • Sox2-Mediated Conversion of NG2 Glia into Induced Neurons in the Injured Adult Cerebral Cortex

    Christophe Heinrich;Matteo Bergami;Sergio Gascón;Alexandra Lepier

  • Reactive astrogliosis causes the development of spontaneous seizures.

    Stefanie Robel;Susan C. Buckingham;Jessica L. Boni;Susan L. Campbell

  • Baclofen reduces post‐synaptic potentials of rat cortical neurones by an action other than its hyperpolarizing action.

    James R. Howe;Bernd Sutor;Walter Zieglgänsberger

  • EPSPs in rat neocortical neurons in vitro. II: Involvement of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors in the generation of EPSPs

    Bernd Sutor;John H. Hablitz

  • Transcriptional Mechanisms of Proneural Factors and REST in Regulating Neuronal Reprogramming of Astrocytes

    Giacomo Masserdotti;Sébastien Gillotin;Sébastien Gillotin;Bernd Sutor;Daniela Drechsel

  • EPSPs in rat neocortical neurons in vitro. I. Electrophysiological evidence for two distinct EPSPs.

    Bernd Sutor;John H. Hablitz

  • Intracellular acidification reduced gap junction coupling between immature rat neocortical pyramidal neurones.

    B Rörig;G Klausa;B Sutor

  • Myelination Defects and Neuronal Hyperexcitability in the Neocortex of Connexin 32-deficient Mice

    Bernd Sutor;Cordula Schmolke;Barbara Teubner;Clemens Schirmer

  • Presynaptic M1 muscarinic cholinoceptors mediate inhibition of excitatory synaptic transmission in the hippocampus in vitro.

    Robert D. Sheridan;Bernd Sutor

  • Serotonin Regulates Gap Junction Coupling in the Developing Rat Somatosensory Cortex

    Birgit Rörig;Bernd Sutor

  • Development of excitatory and inhibitory postsynaptic potentials in the rat neocortex.

    B Sutor;H J Luhmann

  • Dye Coupling between Pyramidal Neurons in Developing Rat Prefrontal and Frontal Cortex Is Reduced by Protein Kinase A Activation and Dopamine.

    B Rorig;G Klausa;B Sutor

  • Involvement of gap junctions in the development of the neocortex.

    Bernd Sutor;Timothy Hagerty

  • A low-voltage activated, transient calcium current is responsible for the time-dependent depolarizing inward rectification of rat neocortical neurons in vitro.

    Bernd Sutor;Walter Zieglgänsberger

  • Regulation of gap junction coupling in the developing neocortex

    Birgit Rörig;Bernd Sutor

  • Transient and selective blockade of adenosine A1-receptors by 8-cyclopentyl-1,3-dipropylxanthine (DPCPX) causes sustained epileptiform activity in hippocampal CA3 neurons of guinea pigs.

    C. Alzheimer;B. Sutor;G. ten Bruggencate

  • Excitatory postsynaptic potentials in rat neocortical neurons in vitro. III. Effects of a quinoxalinedione non-NMDA receptor antagonist.

    John H. Hablitz;Bernd Sutor

  • Activation of μ- and δ-opioid receptors causes presynaptic inhibition of glutamatergic excitation in neocortical neurons

    Andreas M. Ostermeier;Beate Schlösser;Dirk Schwender;Bernd Sutor

  • Characteristics of long-duration inhibitory postsynaptic potentials in rat neocortical neurons in vitro.

    James R. Howe;Bernd Sutor;Walter Zieglgänsberger

Frequent Co-Authors

Walter Zieglgänsberger
Walter Zieglgänsberger Max Planck Society
John J. Hablitz
John J. Hablitz University of Alabama at Birmingham
Christian Alzheimer
Christian Alzheimer University of Erlangen-Nuremberg
Benedikt Berninger
Benedikt Berninger King's College London
Magdalena Götz
Magdalena Götz Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Heiko J. Luhmann
Heiko J. Luhmann Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz
Niels C. Danbolt
Niels C. Danbolt University of Oslo
Harald Sontheimer
Harald Sontheimer University of Virginia
Martin Bilban
Martin Bilban Medical University of Vienna
Tobias Straub
Tobias Straub Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re passionate about neuroscience but need flexibility, exploring accelerated bachelors programs can be a great place to start. These online options allow students to earn a degree faster—often within three years or less—while balancing other personal or professional commitments.

Aspiring neuroscientists should also consider which programs align with their long-term goals. Choosing from the best bachelor's degrees for job security and advancement can open doors to high-demand fields both inside and outside neuroscience. Additionally, reviewing the most lucrative college majors may help you identify interdisciplinary pathways, such as combining neuroscience with computer science or engineering, to further boost career prospects.

Nervous about tuition costs? There are many online colleges that are both affordable and accredited, many of which accept federal financial aid (FAFSA). This makes pursuing an online neuroscience degree more accessible, helping you build a strong foundation for a thriving career in science, technology, or healthcare.

Best Scientists Citing Bernd Sutor

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles