World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
83
Citations
23301
World Ranking
15696
National Ranking
7899

Neuroscience

D-Index
83
Citations
23301
World Ranking
1461
National Ranking
730

Bartley G. Hoebel publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bartley G. Hoebel sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 222 publications — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Bartley G. Hoebel D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bartley G. Hoebel sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 83 D-Index — 85th percentile

85% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1977 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

Bartley G. Hoebel was affiliated with Princeton University in the United States. Their academic career involved research contributing to various scientific fields and topics. Although specific details on publications, co-authors, and research areas are not available, it is known that they made contributions significant enough to be recognized by their peers in the scientific community.

In 1977, Bartley G. Hoebel was awarded the title of Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). This honor indicated recognition of their contributions and standing within the broader scientific community during their active years.

The scientist's work remains documented through their affiliation and historical acknowledgment, though exact details such as main fields of study, subfields, and topics they covered were not provided. This lack of detailed subject-specific data limits a deeper analysis of their research themes or the scope of their scholarly output.

Bartley G. Hoebel is deceased. Their body of work and career stand as a part of the academic record connected with Princeton University. The recognition by the AAAS in 1977 serves as a notable point in the scientist's timeline, reflecting their engagement and presence in scientific circles of the time.

Best Publications

  • Evidence for sugar addiction: Behavioral and neurochemical effects of intermittent, excessive sugar intake

    Nicole M. Avena;Pedro Rada;Bartley G. Hoebel

  • Food reward and cocaine increase extracellular dopamine in the nucleus accumbens as measured by microdialysis.

    Luis Hernandez;Bartley G. Hoebel

  • Evidence That Intermittent, Excessive Sugar Intake Causes Endogenous Opioid Dependence

    Carlo Colantuoni;Pedro Rada;Pedro Rada;Joseph McCarthy;Caroline Patten

  • Daily bingeing on sugar repeatedly releases dopamine in the accumbens shell.

    P. Rada;N.M. Avena;B.G. Hoebel

  • Excessive sugar intake alters binding to dopamine and mu-opioid receptors in the brain

    C. Colantuoni;J. Schwenker;J. McCarthy;P. Rada

  • Hypothalamic control of feeding and self-stimulation.

    Bartley G. Hoebel;Philip Teitelbaum

  • Self-injection of amphetamine directly into the brain.

    Bartley G. Hoebel;Anthony P. Monaco;Luis Hernandez;Edward F. Aulisi

  • Sugar and Fat Bingeing Have Notable Differences in Addictive-like Behavior

    Nicole M. Avena;Pedro Rada;Bartley G. Hoebel

  • Deficits of mesolimbic dopamine neurotransmission in rat dietary obesity.

    B. M. Geiger;M. Haburcak;N. M. Avena;N. M. Avena;M. C. Moyer

  • High-fructose corn syrup causes characteristics of obesity in rats: increased body weight, body fat and triglyceride levels.

    Miriam E. Bocarsly;Elyse S. Powell;Nicole M. Avena;Nicole M. Avena;Bartley G. Hoebel

  • Overeating and obesity from damage to a noradrenergic system in the brain.

    J. Eric Ahlskog;Bartley G. Hoebel

  • Feeding and hypothalamic stimulation increase dopamine turnover in the accumbens.

    Luis Hernandez;Bartley G. Hoebel

  • Weight regulation in normal and hypothalamic hyperphagic rats.

    Bartley G. Hoebel;Philip Teitelbaum

  • A diet promoting sugar dependency causes behavioral cross-sensitization to a low dose of amphetamine.

    N.M. Avena;B.G. Hoebel

  • Hyperphagia and obesity following serotonin depletion by intraventricular p-chlorophenylalanine.

    Stuart T. Breisch;Frank P. Zemlan;Bartley G. Hoebel

  • Dopamine microdialysis in the nucleus accumbens during acute and chronic morphine, naloxone-precipitated withdrawal and clonidine treatment

    Emmanuel Pothos;Pedro Rada;Gregory P. Mark;Bartley G. Hoebel

  • Opiate-like effects of sugar on gene expression in reward areas of the rat brain.

    Rudolph Spangler;Knut M Wittkowski;Noel L Goddard;Nicole M Avena

  • After daily bingeing on a sucrose solution, food deprivation induces anxiety and accumbens dopamine/acetylcholine imbalance.

    Nicole M. Avena;Miriam E. Bocarsly;Pedro Rada;Agnes Kim

  • Microdialysis studies of brain norepinephrine, serotonin, and dopamine release during ingestive behavior. Theoretical and clinical implications.

    B. G. Hoebel;L. Hernandez;D. H. Schwartz;G. P. Mark

  • Restricted eating with weight loss selectively decreases extracellular dopamine in the nucleus accumbens and alters dopamine response to amphetamine, morphine, and food intake

    EN Pothos;I Creese;BG Hoebel

  • Sugar-dependent rats show enhanced responding for sugar after abstinence: evidence of a sugar deprivation effect.

    Nicole M. Avena;Kristin A. Long;Bartley G. Hoebel

Frequent Co-Authors

Pedro Rada
Pedro Rada Duke Kunshan University
Sarah F. Leibowitz
Sarah F. Leibowitz Rockefeller University
Gregory P. Mark
Gregory P. Mark Oregon Health & Science University
Paul W. Glimcher
Paul W. Glimcher New York University
B. Timothy Walsh
B. Timothy Walsh Columbia University
David Sulzer
David Sulzer Columbia University
Patrick K. Randall
Patrick K. Randall Medical University of South Carolina
Andras Hajnal
Andras Hajnal Pennsylvania State University
Richard W. Foltin
Richard W. Foltin Columbia University
Anthony P. Monaco
Anthony P. Monaco Tufts University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in neuroscience opens diverse pathways, many of which can begin with flexible online studies. Students interested in this field often consider what certificates can I get online to enhance their skills or qualifications. Certificates in areas like data analysis or clinical research can boost your resume and complement a neuroscience background.

For those seeking accessible entry points, investigating the easiest online bachelor degree options may help you get started while balancing other commitments. These degrees can provide foundational knowledge relevant for further studies or allied health roles.

If your interests align with behavioral health or social work, earning a master’s degree remotely is now more affordable than ever. The most affordable MSW programs online support career shifts or specialization in social services, which often dovetail with neuroscience careers.

Another high-demand credential is Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA). Prospective students can explore the BCBA programs available online, providing opportunities to work with individuals with autism or developmental disabilities—a field closely connected to neuroscience findings and interventions.

Best Scientists Citing Bartley G. Hoebel

Recently Published Articles