World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
32
Citations
5339
World Ranking
9528
National Ranking
2690

Arthur F. Gmitro publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Arthur F. Gmitro sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 804+

This scientist: 190 publications — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

Arthur F. Gmitro D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Arthur F. Gmitro sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2012 - Fellow of the Indian National Academy of Engineering (INAE)

Overview

Arthur F. Gmitro is affiliated with the University of Arizona in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Medicine and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, with notable work in the subfields of Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Surgery, Biomedical Engineering, Atomic and Molecular Physics and Optics, and Molecular Biology.

The scientist's research topics cover several areas, including:

  • Photodynamic Therapy Research Studies
  • Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
  • Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
  • Optical Coherence Tomography Applications
  • Digital Holography and Microscopy
  • Adaptive Optics and Wavefront Sensing
  • Molecular Biology Techniques and Applications

Among the recent papers authored or coauthored by Arthur F. Gmitro are:

  • Low-cost, chromatic confocal endomicroscope for cellular imaging in vivo, 2021, Biomedical Optics Express
  • Improvement in optical fiber bundle-based imaging using synchronized fiber motion, 2020, Applied Optics
  • Using FDA-approved drugs as off-label fluorescent dyes for optical biopsies: from in silico design to ex vivo proof-of-concept, 2021, Methods and Applications in Fluorescence
  • Multispectral confocal endomicroscopy in lung biopsy guidance, 2023, Journal of Optical Microsystems

Frequent coauthors contributing alongside Arthur F. Gmitro include Andrew R. Rouse, M.C. Larson, Gregory Woodhead, Nachiket Kulkarni, and Andrew Masciola.

The scientist's work has been published in various venues such as:

  • Biomedical Optics Express
  • Applied Optics
  • Methods and Applications in Fluorescence
  • Journal of Optical Microsystems

In recognition of their contributions, Arthur F. Gmitro was awarded the title of Fellow of the Indian National Academy of Engineering (INAE) in 2012.

Best Publications

  • Adaptive reconstruction of phased array MR imagery

    Unknown

  • Confocal microscopy through a fiber-optic imaging bundle

    Arthur F. Gmitro;David Aziz

  • Bone marrow edema pattern in advanced hip osteoarthritis: quantitative assessment with magnetic resonance imaging and correlation with clinical examination, radiographic findings, and histopathology

    Mihra S. Taljanovic;Anna R. Graham;James B. Benjamin;Arthur F. Gmitro

  • Errors in the measurements of T2 using multiple-echo MRI techniques. I. Effects of radiofrequency pulse imperfections.

    S. Majumdar;S. C. Orphanoudakis;A. Gmitro;M. O'Donnell

  • Slit-scanning confocal microendoscope for high-resolution in vivo imaging

    Yashvinder S. Sabharwal;Andrew R. Rouse;La Tanya Donaldson;Mark F. Hopkins

  • Design and demonstration of a miniature catheter for a confocal microendoscope

    Andrew R. Rouse;Angelique Kano;Joshua A. Udovich;Shona M. Kroto

  • OPTICAL FEATURE EXTRACTION VIA THE RADON TRANSFORM.

    Gene R. Gindi;Arthur F. Gmitro

  • Errors in the measurements of T2 using multiple‐echo MRI techniques. II. Effects of static field inhomogeneity

    S. Majumdar;S. C. Orphanoudakis;A. Gmitro;M. O'Donnell

  • Reconstruction of MR images from data acquired on a general nonregular grid by pseudoinverse calculation

    R. Van De Walle;H.H. Barrett;K.J. Myers;M.I. Aitbach

  • Multispectral imaging with a confocal microendoscope

    Andrew R. Rouse;Arthur F. Gmitro

  • Sensitivity of muscle proton spin-spin relaxation time as an index of muscle activation

    Guang Yue;A. L. Alexander;D. H. Laidlaw;A. F. Gmitro

  • Fluorescence spectroscopy guidance of laser ablation of atherosclerotic plaque

    Lawrence I. Deckelbaum;Lawrence I. Deckelbaum;Mark L. Stetz;Ken M. O'Brien;Francis W. Cutruzzola

  • Radial fast spin-echo method for T2-weighted imaging and T2 mapping of the liver.

    Maria I. Altbach;Eric K. Outwater;Theodore P. Trouard;Elizabeth A. Krupinski

  • Analysis and comparison of motion-correction techniques in diffusion-weighted imaging†

    Theodore P. Trouard;Yashvinder Sabharwal;Maria I. Altbach;Arthur F. Gmitro

  • Use of a projection reconstruction method to decrease motion sensitivity in diffusion-weighted MRI.

    Arthur F. Gmitro;Andrew L. Alexander

  • High-resolution diffusion imaging with DIFRAD-FSE (diffusion-weighted radial acquisition of data with fast spin-echo) MRI.

    Theodore P. Trouard;Rebecca J. Theilmann;Maria I. Altbach;Arthur F. Gmitro

  • Imaging of the ovary.

    Molly A. Brewer;Urs Utzinger;Jennifer K. Barton;James B. Hoying

  • Spectral background and transmission characteristics of fiber optic imaging bundles

    Joshua Anthony Udovich;Nathaniel D. Kirkpatrick;Angelique Kano;Anthony Tanbakuchi

  • Hopfield model associative memory with nonzero-diagonal terms in memory matrix

    Gene R. Gindi;Arthur F. Gmitro;Kannan Parthasarathy

  • In vivo imaging of ovarian tissue using a novel confocal microlaparoscope.

    Anthony A. Tanbakuchi;Joshua A. Udovich;Andrew R. Rouse;Kenneth D. Hatch

  • Multispectral confocal microendoscope for in vivo and in situ imaging.

    Houssine Makhlouf;Arthur F. Gmitro;Anthony A. Tanbakuchi;Joshua A. Udovich

  • Development and evaluation of spectral classification algorithms for fluorescence guided laser angioplasty

    K.M. O'Brien;A.F. Gmitro;G.R. Gindi;G.R. Gindi;M.L. Stetz;M.L. Stetz

  • Hemodialysis increases apparent diffusion coefficient of brain water in nephrectomized rats measured by isotropic diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging.

    Jean Philippe Galons;Ted Trouard;Arthur F. Gmitro;Yeong Hau H. Lien

  • Processing of radial fast spin-echo data for obtaining T2 estimates from a single k-space data set.

    Maria I. Altbach;Ali Bilgin;Zhiqiang Li;Eric W. Clarkson

  • EditorialInformation processing in medical imaging

    Harrison H Barrett;Arthur F Gmitro

Frequent Co-Authors

Harrison H. Barrett
Harrison H. Barrett University of Arizona
Andrew L. Alexander
Andrew L. Alexander University of Wisconsin–Madison
Volker Tresp
Volker Tresp Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Sharmila Majumdar
Sharmila Majumdar University of California, San Francisco
John C. Gore
John C. Gore Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Elizabeth A. Krupinski
Elizabeth A. Krupinski Emory University
Michael F. Brown
Michael F. Brown University of Arizona
Roger M. Enoka
Roger M. Enoka University of Colorado Boulder
Robert A. Gatenby
Robert A. Gatenby Moffitt Cancer Center
Glenn D. Boreman
Glenn D. Boreman University of North Carolina at Charlotte

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Engineering and Technology in the USA opens up a variety of online degree options that support both technical growth and diverse career goals. For professionals seeking to enhance their communication strategies in technical fields, an online master of communications offers advanced skills that are essential in today’s collaborative workplaces.

Aspiring tech entrepreneurs looking to innovate within the industry can benefit from an mba for entrepreneurs. These programs deliver core business knowledge tailored to launching and managing new ventures in technology.

For those who want to balance career advancement with flexibility, a 1 year online mba no gmat provides a streamlined pathway to managerial roles without the traditional entrance exams. This is ideal for busy professionals in tech-driven industries.

Effective project management is crucial in engineering and technology. The cheapest online masters in project management enables students to develop leadership skills and manage complex technical projects cost-effectively.

These related online degrees offer targeted expertise and career pathways, empowering students with the skills needed for success in today’s evolving engineering and technology sectors.

Best Scientists Citing Arthur F. Gmitro

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles