World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
45
Citations
6904
World Ranking
19143
National Ranking
1487

Ann E. Wakefield publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ann E. Wakefield sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 91 publications — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Ann E. Wakefield D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ann E. Wakefield sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ann E. Wakefield was affiliated with the University of Oxford in the United Kingdom. The professional record shows a career grounded in academic research within this institution.

Throughout the documented tenure, there are no recent publications listed, which limits specific insight into the latest research contributions. Similarly, there is no available data on frequent co-authors or recurring publication venues tied to this researcher.

Information regarding fields and subfields of study, as well as main research topics, was not recorded, thus no detailed description of specialized scientific domains can be provided.

Regarding awards, there is no retrieved information indicating receipt of any honors or distinctions during their career.

Best Publications

  • A new name (Pneumocystis jiroveci) for Pneumocystis from humans.

    James R. Stringer;Charles B. Beard;Robert F. Miller;Ann E. Wakefield

  • Detection of Pneumocystis carinii with DNA amplification

    A E Wakefield;F J Pixley;S Banerji;K Sinclair

  • DNA sequences identical to Pneumocystis carinii f. sp. carinii and Pneumocystis carinii f. sp. hominis in samples of air spora.

    A E Wakefield

  • DNA amplification on induced sputum samples for diagnosis of Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia

    A.E. Wakefield;L. Guiver;R.F. Miller;J.M. Hopkin

  • Amplification of mitochondrial ribosomal RNA sequences from Pneumocystis carinii DNA of rat and human origin

    A E Wakefield;F J Pixley;S Banerji;K Sinclair

  • Asymptomatic carriage of Pneumocystis jiroveci in subjects undergoing bronchoscopy: a prospective study

    N A Maskell;D J Waine;A Lindley;J C T Pepperell

  • PNEUMOCYSTIS CARINII ORGANISMS DERIVED FROM RAT AND HUMAN HOSTS ARE GENETICALLY DISTINCT

    Kathryn Sinclair;Ann E. Wakefield;Suneale Banerji;Julian M. Hopkin

  • Genetic Diversity at the Internal Transcribed Spacer Regions of the rRNA Operon among Isolates of Pneumocystis carinii from AIDS Patients with Recurrent Pneumonia

    Anthony G. Tsolaki;Robert F. Miller;Anthony P. Underwood;Suneale Banerji

  • Sequence Polymorphisms in the Pneumocystis carinii Cytochrome b Gene and Their Association with Atovaquone Prophylaxis Failure

    Daniel J. Walker;Ann E. Wakefield;Michael N. Dohn;Robert F. Miller

  • Pneumocystis carinii f. sp. hominis DNA in Immunocompetent Health Care Workers in Contact with Patients with P. carinii Pneumonia

    Robert F. Miller;Helen E. Ambrose;Ann E. Wakefield

  • Transmission of Pneumocystis carinii disease from immunocompetent contacts of infected hosts to susceptible hosts.

    A. Dumoulin;E. Mazars;N. Seguy;D. Gargallo-Viola

  • Limited asymptomatic carriage of Pneumocystis jiroveci in human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients.

    Ann E Wakefield;Austin R Lindley;Helen E Ambrose;Cecile-Marie Denis

  • Clusters of Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia: analysis of person-to-person transmission by genotyping.

    J Helweg-Larsen;A G Tsolaki;Raymonde Miller;B Lundgren

  • Phylogeny of Pneumocystis carinii from 18 Primate Species Confirms Host Specificity and Suggests Coevolution

    Christine Demanche;Madeleine Berthelemy;Thierry Petit;Bruno Polack

  • Mitochondrial gene sequences show fungal homology for Pneumocystis carinii.

    F. J. Pixley;A. E. Wakefield;S. Banerji;J. M. Hopkin

  • Infection with Pneumocystis carinii is prevalent in healthy Gambian children.

    A.E. Wakefield;T.J. Stewart;E.R. Moxon;K. Marsh

  • Limited Persistence in and Subsequent Elimination of Pneumocystis carinii from the Lungs after P. carinii Pneumonia

    Sergio L. Vargas;Walter T. Hughes;Ann E. Wakefield;Ann E. Wakefield;Helieh S. Oz;Helieh S. Oz

  • Association of Primary Pneumocystis carinii Infection and Sudden Infant Death Syndrome

    Sergio L. Vargas;Carolina A. Ponce;Walter T. Hughes;Ann E. Wakefield

  • New Nomenclature for the Genus Pneumocystis

    James R. Stringer;Melanie T. Cushion;Ann E. Wakefield

  • Analysis of Genetic Diversity at the arom Locus in Isolates of Pneumocystis carinii

    Suneale Banerji;Elena B. Lugli;Robert F. Miller;Ann E. Wakefield

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert F. Miller
Robert F. Miller University College London
James R. Stringer
James R. Stringer University of Cincinnati
Eduardo Dei-Cas
Eduardo Dei-Cas Institut Pasteur
Elena Ortona
Elena Ortona Istituto Superiore di Sanità
Jacques Guillot
Jacques Guillot École nationale vétérinaire d'Alfort
Melanie T. Cushion
Melanie T. Cushion University of Cincinnati Medical Center
Andrea De Luca
Andrea De Luca University of Siena
Walter T. Hughes
Walter T. Hughes St. Jude Children's Research Hospital
Edward J. Louis
Edward J. Louis University of Leicester
Neil Hall
Neil Hall Norwich Research Park

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Biology and Biochemistry can lead to diverse fields, from healthcare to nutrition. Many students are now choosing flexible, online pathways to advance their studies and careers. Today, online programs allow for faster career transitions and easy access to specialized certifications.

If you’re interested in advanced nursing roles, you might consider enrolling in the fastest post master's pmhnp or the fastest post master's fnp certificate programs. These online programs are designed for working professionals seeking to expand their qualifications efficiently.

Those passionate about food science and public health may benefit from online dietetics programs. These programs offer affordable and convenient ways to gain credentials for work in wellness, nutrition, and clinical settings.

For current nurses aiming to elevate their education, the online rn to bsn programs provide a streamlined path to higher qualifications. With so many flexible online options, pursuing your goals in biology-related careers is more accessible than ever.

Best Scientists Citing Ann E. Wakefield

Recently Published Articles