World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
36
Citations
7458
World Ranking
11067
National Ranking
352

Amy L. Murphy publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Amy L. Murphy sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 130 publications — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Amy L. Murphy D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Amy L. Murphy sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Amy L. Murphy is affiliated with the Fondazione Bruno Kessler in Italy and has contributed to research primarily within the field of Computer Science. Their work encompasses several subfields including Computer Networks and Communications, Biochemistry, Pharmacology, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, and Information Systems.

The scientific topics that Murphy has focused on include:

  • Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities
  • Bluetooth and Wireless Communication Technologies
  • Indoor and Outdoor Localization Technologies
  • Wireless Networks and Protocols
  • Smart Grid Security and Resilience
  • Energy Efficient Wireless Sensor Networks
  • Network Time Synchronization Technologies

Recent publications authored or coauthored by Murphy include:

  • Ultrasound-Assisted Extraction of Polyphenols from Ginger (Zingiber officinale) and Evaluation of its Antioxidant and Antimicrobial Properties, 2020, Journal of Food Chemistry and Nanotechnology

Additional recent papers from the broader dataset, reflecting related fields and collaborations, are:

  • Janus, 2021, Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive Mobile Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies
  • CLIMB: A Pervasive Gameful Platform Promoting Child Independent Mobility, 2020, IEEE Pervasive Computing
  • The Wireless Control Bus: Enabling Efficient Multi-hop Event-Triggered Control with Concurrent Transmissions, 2021, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Unlocking Potential for Low-Carbon Hydrogen Production from U.S. Natural Gas Resources, 2024, Environmental Science & Technology

Murphy's frequent coauthors include:

  • Gian Pietro Picco
  • Amit K. Jaiswal
  • Timofei Istomin
  • Swarna Jaiswal
  • Davide Molteni

Publication venues where Murphy has contributed repeatedly include:

  • Journal of Food Chemistry and Nanotechnology
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Environmental Science & Technology
  • Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive Mobile Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies
  • ARCA (Università Ca' Foscari Venezia)

In book publishing, Murphy has at least one publication with Springer Science+Business Media, including a work titled Coordination Models and Languages released in 2022.

Best Publications

  • Middleware to support sensor network applications

    W.B. Heinzelman;A.L. Murphy;H.S. Carvalho;M.A. Perillo

  • LIME: Linda meets mobility

    Gian Pietro Picco;Amy L. Murphy;Gruia-Catalin Roman

  • LIME: a middleware for physical and logical mobility

    A.L. Murphy;G.P. Picco;G.-C. Roman

  • Monitoring heritage buildings with wireless sensor networks: The Torre Aquila deployment

    Matteo Ceriotti;Luca Mottola;Gian Pietro Picco;Amy L. Murphy

  • LIME: A coordination model and middleware supporting mobility of hosts and agents

    Amy L. Murphy;Gian Pietro Picco;Gruia-Catalin Roman

  • Ultra Low Power Wake-Up Radios: A Hardware and Networking Survey

    Rajeev Piyare;Amy L. Murphy;Csaba Kiraly;Pietro Tosato

  • Software engineering for mobility: a roadmap

    Gruia-Catalin Roman;Gian Pietro Picco;Amy L. Murphy

  • Reliable Communication for Highly Mobile Agents

    Amy L. Murphy;Gian Pietro Picco

  • Reliable communication for highly mobile agents

    A.L. Murphy;G.P. Picco

  • TinyLIME: bridging mobile and sensor networks through middleware

    C. Curino;M. Giani;M. Giorgetta;A. Giusti

  • Practical Data Prediction for Real-World Wireless Sensor Networks

    Usman Raza;Alessandro Camerra;Amy L. Murphy;Themis Palpanas

  • Not all wireless sensor networks are created equal: A comparative study on tunnels

    Luca Mottola;Gian Pietro Picco;Matteo Ceriotti;Ştefan Gunǎ

  • Enabling Disconnected Transitive Communication in Mobile Ad Hoc Networks

    Amy Murphy

  • Efficient content-based event dispatching in the presence of topological reconfiguration

    G.P. Picco;G. Cugola;A.L. Murphy

  • TeenyLIME: transiently shared tuple space middleware for wireless sensor networks

    Paolo Costa;Luca Mottola;Amy L. Murphy;Gian Pietro Picco

  • Programming wireless sensor networks with the TeenyLime middleware

    Paolo Costa;Luca Mottola;Amy L. Murphy;Gian Pietro Picco

  • A general data fusion architecture

    H.S. Carvalho;W.B. Heinzelman;A.L. Murphy;C.J.N. Coelho

  • Mobile data collection in sensor networks: The TinyLime middleware

    Carlo Curino;Matteo Giani;Marco Giorgetta;Alessandro Giusti

  • On-Demand LoRa: Asynchronous TDMA for Energy Efficient and Low Latency Communication in IoT.

    Rajeev Piyare;Amy L. Murphy;Michele Magno;Luca Benini

  • FROMS: Feedback Routing for Optimizing Multiple Sinks in WSN with Reinforcement Learning

    A. Forstert;A.L. Murphy

  • Minimizing the reconfiguration overhead in content-based publish-subscribe

    Gianpaolo Cugola;Davide Frey;Amy L. Murphy;Gian Pietro Picco

  • Is there light at the ends of the tunnel? Wireless sensor networks for adaptive lighting in road tunnels

    Matteo Ceriotti;Michele Corra;Leandro D'Orazio;Roberto Doriguzzi

Frequent Co-Authors

Gian Pietro Picco
Gian Pietro Picco University of Trento
Gruia-Catalin Roman
Gruia-Catalin Roman University of New Mexico
Luca Mottola
Luca Mottola Polytechnic University of Milan
Francesca Cagnacci
Francesca Cagnacci Fondazione Edmund Mach
George Varghese
George Varghese University of California, Los Angeles
Gianpaolo Cugola
Gianpaolo Cugola Polytechnic University of Milan
Wendi Heinzelman
Wendi Heinzelman University of Rochester
Michele Magno
Michele Magno ETH Zurich
Elisabetta Farella
Elisabetta Farella Fondazione Bruno Kessler
Luca Benini
Luca Benini ETH Zurich

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a Computer Science degree in the USA can open diverse career opportunities, even for those who may not have a traditional academic background. Today, there are many online colleges that accept low gpa, making a tech education more accessible than ever.

Fast-track programs like a 1 year computer science degree online allow motivated students to graduate quickly and begin their careers sooner. These programs are ideal for people seeking an accelerated path into tech.

Computer Science also intersects with other fields such as environmental science and engineering. Graduates curious about sustainability or technology’s impact on the environment can explore jobs for environmental science majors, combining coding skills with environmental stewardship.

Affordable and accredited options also exist for those wanting to branch into related fields—such as an environmental engineering bachelor's degree online. These programs can broaden your expertise and strengthen your career prospects in both tech and STEM industries.

Best Scientists Citing Amy L. Murphy

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles