World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 43 7060 6585 41 36 178 33728

Alice Theadom publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Alice Theadom between 2000 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Alice Theadom published across 26 years, from 2000 to 2025, averaging 10.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 32 publications in 2021. 36 of the 266 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2000 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 32. Peak 32 publications in 2021. 2000: 1 publication 2001: 0 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 0 publications 2005: 0 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 10 publications 2015: 19 publications 2016: 16 publications 2017: 27 publications 2018: 20 publications 2019: 20 publications 2020: 16 publications 2021: 32 publications 2022: 13 publications 2023: 14 publications 2024: 17 publications 2025: 19 publications
2000 2025

266 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Alice Theadom: publications per year, 2000 to 2025
Year Publications
2000 1
2001 0
2002 0
2003 2
2004 0
2005 0
2006 5
2007 3
2008 7
2009 5
2010 5
2011 2
2012 7
2013 6
2014 10
2015 19
2016 16
2017 27
2018 20
2019 20
2020 16
2021 32
2022 13
2023 14
2024 17
2025 19
Total 266
Download as CSV

Alice Theadom publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alice Theadom sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 171–180 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 178 publications — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450 178
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Alice Theadom D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alice Theadom sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 42–43 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617 43
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Alice Theadom is affiliated with Auckland University of Technology in New Zealand. Their research primarily focuses on the field of Medicine, with a particular emphasis on Epidemiology, Emergency Medicine, Neurology, Clinical Psychology, and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health as subfields of study.

The main topics covered in their work include:

  • Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
  • Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
  • Trauma and Emergency Care Studies
  • Injury Epidemiology and Prevention
  • Sports injuries and prevention
  • Suicide and Self-Harm Studies

Some of their recent papers illustrate the scope and focus of their research:

  • Incidence of Sports-Related Traumatic Brain Injury of All Severities: A Systematic Review, 2020, published in Neuroepidemiology
  • Traumatic brain injury: progress and challenges in prevention, clinical care, and research, 2022, published in The Lancet Neurology (authored by Andrew I.R. Maas but relevant to the research field)
  • Cumulative Sport-Related Injuries and Longer Term Impact in Retired Male Elite- and Amateur-Level Rugby Code Athletes and Non-contact Athletes: A Retrospective Study, 2020, published in Sports Medicine
  • Sex differences in outcomes from mild traumatic brain injury eight years post-injury, 2022, published in PLoS ONE
  • Mental Health and Wellbeing of Retired Elite and Amateur Rugby Players and Non-contact Athletes and Associations with Sports-Related Concussion: The UK Rugby Health Project, 2021, published in Sports Medicine

Theadom collaborates frequently with several co-authors, including:

  • Patria Hume
  • Deborah L. Snell
  • Josh W. Faulkner
  • Suzanne Barker-Collo
  • Mangor Pedersen

Their work is often published in specialized venues, reflecting their research interests, including:

  • Brain Injury
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Brain Impairment
  • Sports Medicine
  • Frontiers in Neurology

Best Publications

  • Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 301 acute and chronic diseases and injuries in 188 countries, 1990-2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013

    Theo Vos;Ryan M. Barber;Brad Bell;Amelia Bertozzi-Villa

  • Global, regional, and national burden of neurological disorders, 1990-2016: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016

    Valery L Feigin;Amanuel Alemu Abajobir;Kalkidan Hassen Abate;Foad Abd-Allah

  • Global, regional, and national disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) for 333 diseases and injuries and healthy life expectancy (HALE) for 195 countries and territories, 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016

    Simon I Hay;Amanuel Alemu Abajobir;Kalkidan Hassen Abate;Cristiana Abbafati

  • Traumatic brain injury: integrated approaches to improve prevention, clinical care, and research

    Andrew I R Maas;David K Menon;P David Adelson;Nada Andelic

  • Global, regional, and national disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) for 333 diseases and injuries and healthy life expectancy (HALE) for 195 countries and territories, 1990-2016

    Simon I. Hay;Amanuel Alemu Abajobir;Kalkidan Hassen Abate;Cristiana Abbafati

  • Global, regional, and national burden of neurological disorders during 1990-2015

    Valery L. Feigin;Amanuel Alemu Abajobir;Kalkidan Hassen Abate;Foad Abd-Allah

  • Global, regional, and national burden of traumatic brain injury and spinal cord injury, 1990-2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of disease Study 2016

    Spencer L James;Alice Theadom;Richard G Ellenbogen;Marlena S Bannick

  • The global burden of injury: incidence, mortality, disability-adjusted life years and time trends from the Global Burden of Disease study 2013

    Juanita A Haagsma;Nicholas Graetz;Ian Bolliger;Mohsen Naghavi

  • Incidence of traumatic brain injury in New Zealand: a population-based study

    Valery L. Feigin;Alice M. Theadom;Suzanne Barker-Collo;Nicola J. Starkey

  • Epidemiology of Traumatic Brain Injury in Europe: A Living Systematic Review.

    Alexandra Brazinova;Veronika Rehorcikova;Mark Steven Taylor;Veronika Buckova

  • Case-mix, care pathways, and outcomes in patients with traumatic brain injury in CENTER-TBI: a European prospective, multicentre, longitudinal, cohort study

    Ewout W. Steyerberg;Ewout W. Steyerberg;Eveline Wiegers;Charlie Sewalt;Andras Buki

  • Effects of preoperative smoking cessation on the incidence and risk of intraoperative and postoperative complications in adult smokers: a systematic review

    Alice Theadom;Mark Cropley

  • Persistent problems 1 year after mild traumatic brain injury: a longitudinal population study in New Zealand

    Alice Theadom;Varsha Parag;Tony Dowell;Kathryn McPherson

  • Exploring the role of sleep and coping in quality of life in fibromyalgia.

    Alice Theadom;Mark Cropley;Mark Cropley;Kirsty-Louise Humphrey;Kirsty-Louise Humphrey

  • Mind and Body Therapy for Fibromyalgia

    Alice Theadom;Mark Cropley;Helen E Smith;Valery L Feigin

  • Epidemiology of ischaemic stroke and traumatic brain injury

    Valery L. Feigin;Suzanne Barker-Collo;Rita Krishnamurthi;Alice Theadom

  • Encouraging family engagement in the rehabilitation process: a rehabilitation provider’s development of support strategies for family members of people with traumatic brain injury

    Allison M. Foster;Jonathan Armstrong;Ann Buckley;Joanne Sherry

  • A Comparison of Cognitive Function in Former Rugby Union Players Compared with Former Non-Contact-Sport Players and the Impact of Concussion History

    Patria A. Hume;Alice M. Theadom;Gwyn N. Lewis;Kenneth L. Quarrie

  • Years of life lost due to traumatic brain injury in Europe: a cross-sectional analysis of 16 countries

    Marek Majdan;Dominika Plancikova;Andrew Maas;Suzanne Polinder

  • Population-based cohort study of the impacts of mild traumatic brain injury in adults four years post-injury.

    Alice Theadom;Nicola Starkey;Suzanne Barker-Collo;Kelly Jones

  • Cost of traumatic brain injury in New Zealand Evidence from a population-based study

    Braden Te Ao;Paul Brown;Martin Tobias;Shanthi N. Ameratunga

  • New Strategy to Reduce the Global Burden of Stroke

    Valery L. Feigin;Rita Krishnamurthi;Rohit Bhattacharjee;Priya Parmar

Frequent Co-Authors

Valery L. Feigin
Valery L. Feigin Auckland University of Technology
Suzanne Barker-Collo
Suzanne Barker-Collo University of Auckland
Nicola J. Starkey
Nicola J. Starkey University of Waikato
Mark Cropley
Mark Cropley University of Surrey
Shanthi Ameratunga
Shanthi Ameratunga University of Auckland
Derrick A. Bennett
Derrick A. Bennett University of Oxford
Amanda G. Thrift
Amanda G. Thrift Monash University
Mohammad Ali Sahraian
Mohammad Ali Sahraian Tehran University of Medical Sciences
Anthony J. Frew
Anthony J. Frew Royal Sussex County Hospital
Richard J. Siegert
Richard J. Siegert Auckland University of Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online psychology degrees opens the door to a range of fulfilling career paths, including counseling, mental health services, research, and education. Many students are interested in finding efficient education pathways that lead directly to rewarding careers. Accelerated online programs have become increasingly popular, offering flexible study options tailored to students’ schedules and personal commitments.

For those aiming to enter the counseling profession, state-specific guidance is crucial. For example, you can learn about Indiana fastest counseling programs or discover the quickest path to becoming a counselor in Iowa. If you are considering licensure in the Midwest or South, resources like the fastest way to become a counselor in Kansas and Kentucky accelerated counseling programs provide essential information on state-specific requirements and program options.

By choosing the right online degree and understanding the steps required in your state, you can efficiently begin your journey toward a dynamic career in psychology or counseling.

Best Scientists Citing Alice Theadom

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles