World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Computer Science 32 12986 12602 824 811 417 5783

Ahmet M. Kondoz publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Ahmet M. Kondoz between 1961 and 2021, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Ahmet M. Kondoz published across 61 years, from 1961 to 2021, averaging 6.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 49 publications in 2009. 15 of the 420 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1961 to 2021. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 49. Peak 49 publications in 2009. 1961: 1 publication 1962: 0 publications 1963: 0 publications 1964: 0 publications 1965: 0 publications 1966: 0 publications 1967: 0 publications 1968: 0 publications 1969: 0 publications 1970: 0 publications 1971: 0 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 2 publications 1988: 4 publications 1989: 3 publications 1990: 3 publications 1991: 5 publications 1992: 4 publications 1993: 9 publications 1994: 3 publications 1995: 13 publications 1996: 6 publications 1997: 9 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 15 publications 2000: 11 publications 2001: 19 publications 2002: 11 publications 2003: 8 publications 2004: 14 publications 2005: 9 publications 2006: 14 publications 2007: 18 publications 2008: 47 publications 2009: 49 publications 2010: 23 publications 2011: 13 publications 2012: 21 publications 2013: 15 publications 2014: 22 publications 2015: 2 publications 2016: 4 publications 2017: 11 publications 2018: 8 publications 2019: 6 publications 2020: 6 publications 2021: 9 publications
1961 2021

420 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Ahmet M. Kondoz: publications per year, 1961 to 2021
Year Publications
1961 1
1962 0
1963 0
1964 0
1965 0
1966 0
1967 0
1968 0
1969 0
1970 0
1971 0
1972 0
1973 0
1974 0
1975 0
1976 0
1977 0
1978 0
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 2
1988 4
1989 3
1990 3
1991 5
1992 4
1993 9
1994 3
1995 13
1996 6
1997 9
1998 3
1999 15
2000 11
2001 19
2002 11
2003 8
2004 14
2005 9
2006 14
2007 18
2008 47
2009 49
2010 23
2011 13
2012 21
2013 15
2014 22
2015 2
2016 4
2017 11
2018 8
2019 6
2020 6
2021 9
Total 420
Download as CSV

Ahmet M. Kondoz publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ahmet M. Kondoz sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 32–41 to 991+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 609. Most scientists, 609, have 142–151 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 412–421 publications, is where this scientist sits. 32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32–41 publications 991+

This scientist: 417 publications — 88th percentile

88% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
32–41 7
42–51 22
52–61 82
62–71 134
72–81 249
82–91 324
92–101 421
102–111 420
112–121 497
122–131 544
132–141 555
142–151 609
152–161 559
162–171 534
172–181 556
182–191 583
192–201 519
202–211 508
212–221 490
222–231 437
232–241 423
242–251 408
252–261 377
262–271 301
272–281 335
282–291 320
292–301 293
302–311 250
312–321 238
322–331 206
332–341 209
342–351 208
352–361 162
362–371 176
372–381 127
382–391 158
392–401 128
402–411 104
412–421 94 417
422–431 99
432–441 83
442–451 108
452–461 73
462–471 77
472–481 69
482–491 84
492–501 62
502–511 54
512–521 57
522–531 51
532–541 51
542–551 32
552–561 38
562–571 28
572–581 43
582–591 33
592–601 41
602–611 32
612–621 28
622–631 25
632–641 27
642–651 17
652–661 20
662–671 17
672–681 15
682–691 14
692–701 21
702–711 13
712–721 12
722–731 19
732–741 14
742–751 12
752–761 10
762–771 10
772–781 11
782–791 10
792–801 11
802–811 8
812–821 8
822–831 7
832–841 11
842–851 10
852–861 5
862–871 9
872–881 4
882–891 6
892–901 3
902–911 6
912–921 3
922–931 2
932–941 2
942–951 2
952–961 3
962–971 3
972–981 3
982–990 5
991+ 100
Download as CSV

Ahmet M. Kondoz D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ahmet M. Kondoz sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 52 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 131+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 990. Most scientists, 990, have 36–37 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 32–33 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 879
32–33 983 32
34–35 918
36–37 990
38–39 968
40–41 907
42–43 821
44–45 763
46–47 689
48–49 543
50–51 543
52–53 518
54–55 500
56–57 458
58–59 400
60–61 337
62–63 308
64–65 292
66–67 249
68–69 213
70–71 192
72–73 189
74–75 165
76–77 139
78–79 119
80–81 121
82–83 113
84–85 88
86–87 87
88–89 75
90–91 69
92–93 57
94–95 46
96–97 38
98–99 34
100–101 36
102–103 27
104–105 37
106–107 18
108–109 31
110–111 19
112–113 16
114–115 12
116–117 20
118–119 15
120–121 5
122–123 20
124–125 8
126–127 5
128–129 7
130 3
131+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Artificial intelligence
  • Computer network
  • Computer vision

His main research concerns Artificial intelligence, Computer vision, Video quality, Computer network and Data compression. His Artificial intelligence research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Detection theory, Detector and Pattern recognition. His study in Computer vision is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Depth perception and Codec.

The various areas that Ahmet M. Kondoz examines in his Video quality study include Channel code, Communication channel and Coding tree unit. The concepts of his Computer network study are interwoven with issues in Wireless and General Packet Radio Service. His Data compression research focuses on subjects like Stereoscopy, which are linked to Scalable Video Coding.

His most cited work include:

  • Digital Speech: Coding for Low Bit Rate Communication Systems (311 citations)
  • Quality analysis for 3D video using 2D video quality models (154 citations)
  • Quality Evaluation of Color Plus Depth Map-Based Stereoscopic Video (150 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

His primary areas of investigation include Artificial intelligence, Computer vision, Speech recognition, Speech coding and Video quality. His Artificial intelligence study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Coding and Pattern recognition. Multiview Video Coding, Data compression, Scalable Video Coding, Video tracking and Motion estimation are the primary areas of interest in his Computer vision study.

His work carried out in the field of Video tracking brings together such families of science as Multimedia and Video processing. His Speech coding research incorporates themes from Bit error rate and Voice activity detection. Robustness, Computer network and Network packet is closely connected to Real-time computing in his research, which is encompassed under the umbrella topic of Video quality.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Artificial intelligence (31.46%)
  • Computer vision (27.11%)
  • Speech recognition (20.97%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2012-2021)?

  • Artificial intelligence (31.46%)
  • Multimedia (12.28%)
  • Video quality (15.60%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

Artificial intelligence, Multimedia, Video quality, Computer vision and Computer network are his primary areas of study. Ahmet M. Kondoz has researched Artificial intelligence in several fields, including Lidar and Ranging. His studies in Multimedia integrate themes in fields like Quality of experience, Modality, The Internet, Adaptation and User experience design.

He interconnects Video tracking, Multiview Video Coding, Real-time computing, Video processing and Coding in the investigation of issues within Video quality. His Video tracking research includes elements of Scalable Video Coding and Motion compensation. His Computer vision research includes themes of Radar, Data stream mining and Subjective video quality.

Between 2012 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • Toward an Impairment Metric for Stereoscopic Video: A Full-Reference Video Quality Metric to Assess Compressed Stereoscopic Video (63 citations)
  • Privacy-preserving blockchain based IoT ecosystem using attribute-based encryption (56 citations)
  • Fusion of LiDAR and camera sensor data for environment sensing in driverless vehicles (25 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Artificial intelligence
  • Computer network
  • Computer vision

His primary scientific interests are in Computer vision, Artificial intelligence, Computer network, Multimedia and Video quality. His Computer vision research integrates issues from Radar, Lidar and Measure. His research in Artificial intelligence intersects with topics in Algorithm design, Ranging and Data stream mining.

His Multimedia study incorporates themes from Cellular network, Multimedia Broadcast Multicast Service, Quality of experience, The Internet and Mobile device. His Video quality study combines topics in areas such as Video tracking and Video processing. His Video processing research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Multiview Video Coding, Uncompressed video, Subjective video quality, Dynamic Adaptive Streaming over HTTP and Video compression picture types.

Best Publications

  • Digital Speech: Coding for Low Bit Rate Communication Systems

    A. Kindoz;A. M. Kondoz

  • Privacy-preserving blockchain based IoT ecosystem using attribute-based encryption

    Yogachandran Rahulamathavan;Raphael C.-W Phan;Muttukrishnan Rajarajan;Sudip Misra

  • Quality analysis for 3D video using 2D video quality models

    S.L.P. Yasakethu;C. Hewage;W. Fernando;A. Kondoz

  • Quality Evaluation of Color Plus Depth Map-Based Stereoscopic Video

    C.T.E.R. Hewage;S.T. Worrall;S. Dogan;S. Villette

  • Analysis and improvement of a statistical model-based voice activity detector

    Yong Duk Cho;A. Kondoz

  • Prediction of stereoscopic video quality using objective quality models of 2-D video

    C.T.E.R. Hewage;S.T. Worrall;S. Dogan;A.M. Kondoz

  • Improved voice activity detection based on a smoothed statistical likelihood ratio

    Y.D. Cho;K. Al-Naimi;A. Kondoz

  • Error-resilient video transcoding for robust internetwork communications using GPRS

    S. Dogan;A. Cellatoglu;M. Uyguroglu;A.H. Sadka

  • Robust Fusion of LiDAR and Wide-Angle Camera Data for Autonomous Mobile Robots.

    Varuna De Silva;Jamie Roche;Ahmet M. Kondoz

  • Toward an Impairment Metric for Stereoscopic Video: A Full-Reference Video Quality Metric to Assess Compressed Stereoscopic Video

    V. De Silva;H. K. Arachchi;E. Ekmekcioglu;A. Kondoz

  • Acoustic Source Separation of Convolutive Mixtures Based on Intensity Vector Statistics

    B. Gunel;H. Hachabiboglu;A.M. Kondoz

  • 3D motion estimation for depth image coding in 3D video coding

    B. Kamolrat;W.A.C. Fernando;M. Mrak;A. Kondoz

  • Perceptual Video Quality Metric for 3D video quality assessment

    P. Joveluro;H. Malekmohamadi;W. A. C Fernando;A. M. Kondoz

  • Sensitivity Analysis of the Human Visual System for Depth Cues in Stereoscopic 3-D Displays

    V De Silva;A Fernando;S Worrall;H K Arachchi

  • Secure voice over GSM and other low bit rate systems

    N. Kaiugampala;S. Villette;A.M. Kondoz

  • PITCH DETERMINATION FOR SPEECH CODING

    Villette Stephane Pierre;Kondoz Ahmet Mehmet

  • Real time data transmission over GSM voice channel for secure voice and data applications

    N.N. Katugampala;K.T. Al-Naimi;S. Villette;A.M. Kondoz

  • Frame concealment algorithm for stereoscopic video using motion vector sharing

    C.T.E.R. Hewage;S. Worrall;S. Dogan;A.M. Kondoz

  • Real-time end-to-end secure voice communications over GSM voice channel

    N.N. Katugampala;K.T. Al-Naimi;S. Villette;A.M. Kondoz

  • Just noticeable difference in depth model for stereoscopic 3D displays

    D. V. S. X. De Silva;W. A. C. Fernando;S. T. Worrall;S. L. P. Yasakethu

Frequent Co-Authors

Barry G. Evans
Barry G. Evans University of Surrey
Muttukrishnan Rajarajan
Muttukrishnan Rajarajan City, University of London
Hasan Demirel
Hasan Demirel Eastern Mediterranean University
Thomas Sikora
Thomas Sikora Technical University of Berlin
Sudip Misra
Sudip Misra Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur
Raphael C.-W. Phan
Raphael C.-W. Phan Monash University Malaysia
A.M. Tekalp
A.M. Tekalp Koç University
Turgay Celik
Turgay Celik University of the Witwatersrand
Gholamreza Anbarjafari
Gholamreza Anbarjafari University of Tartu

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in Computer Science opens up a variety of opportunities, both in education and career advancement. For many, online learning provides a flexible and accessible route to gaining valuable skills. Options range from online associate degree programs for those starting out, to advanced credentials suited for professionals seeking further specialization.

If you’re looking for the most worthwhile masters degrees in technology and related fields, Computer Science remains high in demand. These programs are designed to enhance career prospects and earning potential.

Cost and entry requirements are top concerns for many students. Luckily, there are cheap online degrees fast available from accredited institutions, providing quality education at a lower price and faster pace. For those who may have a lower GPA, don’t worry—many college that accepts low gpa options are available and provide supportive pathways to academic success.

Whether you’re pursuing your first degree or aiming for a specialized master’s, online education in Computer Science can help you reach your career goals efficiently and affordably.

Best Scientists Citing Ahmet M. Kondoz

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles