| Discipline name | Position | Best Scientists | Publications | D-Index |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 264 | 65 | 51 | 22 |
The main research concerns discussed in European Review of Social Psychology are Social psychology, Social identity theory, Social psychology (sociology), Ingroups and outgroups and Perception. Aside from research in Social psychology, European Review of Social Psychology also discusses Perspective (graphical) studies. Social identity approach is part of Social identity theory studies tackled in European Review of Social Psychology.
Social identity approach research discussed connects with the study of Identity formation. The Identity formation study featured in the journal draws parallels with the field of Cultural identity. It explores topics in Ingroups and outgroups which can be helpful for research in disciplines like Developmental psychology and Out-group homogeneity.
The work on Social group addressed in the journal expands to the thematically related Social relation. Most of the works presented in it deals with Cognitive psychology but it intersects with the subject of Social cognition. The study on Outgroup presented in it intersects with the topics under Prejudice.
The most cited publications focus largely on the fields of Social psychology, Social identity theory, Social group, Social psychology (sociology) and Ingroups and outgroups. In addition to Social psychology research, the journal papers aim to explore topics under Normative, Phenomenon and Action (philosophy). The journal publications tackle studies in Perception and the interrelated subject of In-group favoritism to gain insights into Social identity theory.
European Review of Social Psychology mainly tackles studies in Social psychology, Social psychology (sociology), Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak and Ingroups and outgroups. European Review of Social Psychology links adjacent topics like Social psychology with Diversity (politics). The Diversity (politics) works featured in European Review of Social Psychology incorporate elements from Dehumanization and Prejudice (legal term).
Some problems in Social psychology (sociology) that were presented in the journal overlapped with concepts under Existential Psychology, Meaning (existential), Subjective well-being, Redistribution (cultural anthropology) and Economic inequality. It served as a forum through which researchers explored works on 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak in conjunction with disciplines such as Checklist, Interpersonal interaction, Compliance (psychology), Applied psychology and Effective response. The work on Ingroups and outgroups tackled in European Review of Social Psychology brings together disciplines like Attribution and Openness to experience.
A key indicator for each journal is its effectiveness in reaching other researchers with the papers published at that venue.
The chart below presents the interquartile range (first quartile 25%, median 50% and third quartile 75%) of the number of citations of articles over time.
The top authors publishing in European Review of Social Psychology (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top authors publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top authors.
Only papers with recognized affiliations are considered
The top affiliations publishing in European Review of Social Psychology (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top affiliations publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top affiliations.
The publication chance index shows the ratio of articles published by the best research institutions in the journal edition to all articles published within that journal. The best research institutions were selected based on the largest number of articles published during all editions of the journal.
The chart below presents the percentage ratio of articles from top institutions (based on their ranking of total papers).Top affiliations were grouped by their rank into the following tiers: top 1-10, top 11-20, top 21-50, and top 51+. Only articles with a recognized affiliation are considered.
During the most recent 2021 edition, 0.00% of publications had an unrecognized affiliation. Out of the publications with recognized affiliations, 16.67% were posted by at least one author from the top 10 institutions publishing in the journal. Another 5.56% included authors affiliated with research institutions from the top 11-20 affiliations. Institutions from the 21-50 range included 38.89% of all publications and 38.89% were from other institutions.
A very common phenomenon observed among researchers publishing scientific articles is the intentional selection of journals they have already attended in the past. In particular, it is worth analyzing the case when the authors participate in the same journal from year to year.
The Returning Authors Index presented below illustrates the ratio of authors who participated in both a given as well as the previous edition of the journal in relation to all participants in a given year.
The graph below shows the Returning Institution Index, illustrating the ratio of institutions that participated in both a given and the previous edition of the conference in relation to all affiliations present in a given year.
Our experience to innovation index was created to show a cross-section of the experience level of authors publishing in a journal. The index includes the authors publishing at the last edition of a journal, grouped by total number of publications throughout their academic career (P) and the total number of citations of these publications ever received (C).
The group intervals were selected empirically to best show the diversity of the authors' experiences, their labels were selected as a convenience, not as judgment. The authors were divided into the following groups:
The chart below illustrates experience levels of first authors in cases of publications with multiple authors.
Once equipped with an understanding of social psychology's top research topics, one might be interested in pursuing a career in this field. There are various specializations within social psychology that lead to numerous career paths. One such specialization, criminal psychology, combines the principles of social and clinical psychology to understand, predict, and prevent criminal behavior.
A career in criminal psychology can be incredibly rewarding, providing the opportunity to play a pivotal role in the justice system. This profession can also provide a decent salary. For instance, the criminal psychology salary in utah is competitive with other psychology specialties.
To become a criminal psychologist, certain qualifications and training are necessary. These typically include a bachelor's degree in psychology, followed by a doctoral degree in psychology or a related field. This doctoral degree should ideally specialize in criminal, forensic, or clinical psychology. Subsequent training includes internships or other hands-on experiences, typically within the justice system or a related setting.
Once one has acquired the necessary qualifications, they can begin their professional journey in criminal psychology. Whether working with law enforcement, providing expert evidence in court, or counseling individuals in prison, the field of criminal psychology offers diverse and engaging opportunities.
Stephan Lewandowsky;Sander van der Linden
(2021)Unknown
(2022)Frank Martela;Nelli Hankonen;Richard M. Ryan;Maarten Vansteenkiste
(2021)Michael A. Hogg
(2021)Maik Bieleke;Lucas Keller;Peter M. Gollwitzer
(2021)John Dixon;Guy Elcheroth;Philippa Kerr;John Drury
(2020)Fiona A. White;Rachel Maunder;Stefano Verrelli
(2020)Karen Phalet;Gülseli Baysu
(2020)Nick Haslam;Brodie C. Dakin;Fabian Fabiano;Melanie J. McGrath
(2020)Mark Schaller;Damian R. Murray;Marlise K. Hofer
(2021)Pursuing a degree in Psychology can open doors to various career pathways, from counseling to research and beyond. Many students consider online education for its flexibility and accessibility. For those exploring options, an online associates degree in psychology or related fields can be a great starting point. These programs often provide foundational knowledge and prepare students for entry-level roles or further study.
As you advance your studies, choosing the right master’s program is crucial. Some of the most valuable masters degrees blend theoretical knowledge with practical skills that employers highly regard, making them worth considering for career advancement.
Cost is a key factor for many students. Accessing the cheapest online college options can reduce financial pressure without compromising educational quality. Additionally, students with less-than-perfect academic records can still find opportunities, as some of the best colleges for low gpa offer programs that support diverse learners aiming to succeed in psychology careers.
