International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS)

This ranking presents a comprehensive list of leading scientific conferences from the field of Business and Management. The ranking has been meticulously compiled by Research.com, a foremost authority in science research across all major disciplines. Since 2014, Research.com has provided trusted and authoritative data on scientific contributions, including in the domain of Business and Management.

The position of each conference within the ranking is determined based on a unique bibliometric score developed by Research.com. This score incorporates both the estimated h-index and the number of distinguished scientists who have participated in the conference during the previous three years. All Impact Score values listed were collected on 2024-11-27, ensuring that the information is both current and reliable.

The development of this ranking involved an in-depth process, including the examination of over 216 conferences, each rigorously selected after comprehensive evaluation. The analysis encompassed more than 727 scientific documents published in the last three years, authored by 2,177 leading and widely respected scientists in the area of Business and Management. This thorough approach underscores the depth of research and expertise applied in the creation of the ranking.

Readers interested in a more detailed explanation of how conference scores are calculated are encouraged to consult our Methodology Page. Here, the exact bibliometric criteria and analytical methods utilized by our experts are described in full, further highlighting the transparency and rigor behind the ranking process.

Papers citation over time

A key indicator for each conference is its effectiveness in reaching other researchers with the papers published at that venue.

The chart below presents the interquartile range (first quartile 25%, median 50% and third quartile 75%) of the number of citations of articles over time.

Top authors and change over time

The top authors publishing at International Conference on Information Systems (based on the number of publications) are:

• Jan Marco Leimeister (39 papers) published 8 papers at the last edition, 2 less than at the previous edition,
• Alexander Benlian (29 papers) published 3 papers at the last edition the same number as at the previous edition,
• Paul A. Pavlou (24 papers) published 3 papers at the last edition, 2 less than at the previous edition,
• Shan L. Pan (23 papers) published 1 paper at the last edition, 2 less than at the previous edition,
• Dirk Neumann (22 papers) absent at the last edition.

The overall trend for top authors publishing at this conference is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the conference for top authors.

Top affiliations and change over time

Only papers with recognized affiliations are considered

The top affiliations publishing at International Conference on Information Systems (based on the number of publications) are:

• National University of Singapore (150 papers) published 18 papers at the last edition, 2 more than at the previous edition,
• University of St. Gallen (78 papers) published 18 papers at the last edition, 1 more than at the previous edition,
• University of New South Wales (72 papers) published 14 papers at the last edition, 1 more than at the previous edition,
• University of Maryland, College Park (56 papers) published 5 papers at the last edition, 3 less than at the previous edition,
• Temple University (55 papers) published 3 papers at the last edition, 7 less than at the previous edition.

The overall trend for top affiliations publishing at this conference is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the conference for top affiliations.

Publication chance based on affiliation

The publication chance index shows the ratio of articles published by the best research institutions at the conference edition to all articles published within that conference. The best research institutions were selected based on the largest number of articles published during all editions of the conference.

The chart below presents the percentage ratio of articles from top institutions (based on their ranking of total papers).Top affiliations were grouped by their rank into the following tiers: top 1-10, top 11-20, top 21-50, and top 51+. Only articles with a recognized affiliation are considered.

During the most recent 2017 edition, 7.14% of publications had an unrecognized affiliation. Out of the publications with recognized affiliations, 17.55% were posted by at least one author from the top 10 institutions publishing at the conference. Another 10.85% included authors affiliated with research institutions from the top 11-20 affiliations. Institutions from the 21-50 range included 19.92% of all publications and 51.68% were from other institutions.

Returning Authors Index

A very common phenomenon observed among researchers publishing scientific articles is the intentional selection of conferences they have already attended in the past. In particular, it is worth analyzing the case when the authors participate in the same conference from year to year.

The Returning Authors Index presented below illustrates the ratio of authors who participated in both a given as well as the previous edition of the conference in relation to all participants in a given year.

Returning Institution Index

The graph below shows the Returning Institution Index, illustrating the ratio of institutions that participated in both a given and the previous edition of the conference in relation to all affiliations present in a given year.

The experience to innovation index

Our experience to innovation index was created to show a cross-section of the experience level of authors publishing at a conference. The index includes the authors publishing at the last edition of a conference, grouped by total number of publications throughout their academic career (P) and the total number of citations of these publications ever received (C).

The group intervals were selected empirically to best show the diversity of the authors' experiences, their labels were selected as a convenience, not as judgment. The authors were divided into the following groups:

• Novice - P < 5 or C < 25 (the number of publications less than 5 or the number of citations less than 25),
• Competent - P < 10 or C < 100 (the number of publications less than 10 or the number of citations less than 100),
• Experienced - P < 25 or C < 625 (the number of publications less than 25 or the number of citations less than 625),
• Master - P < 50 or C < 2500 (the number of publications less than 50 or the number of citations less than 2500),
• Star - P ≥ 50 and C ≥ 2500 (both the number of publications greater than 50 and the number of citations greater than 2500).

The chart below illustrates experience levels of first authors in cases of publications with multiple authors.

Potential Career Paths for International Conference on Information Systems Attendees in Wisconsin

Another aspect to consider when attending an international conference such as the International Conference on Information Systems is how the knowledge and insights gained can be applied to future career paths. Those attending such conferences typically have a strong interest in the fields of knowledge management, information systems, and marketing, amongst others. Therefore, understanding what potential job opportunities are available in related industries can provide context and add value to the attendee's overall conference experience. For instance, one of the potential career paths that perfectly encapsulates the integration of these fields is Urban Planning. In Wisconsin, urban planning is a relevant and growing field, mainly due to ongoing initiatives towards sustainable city planning and development. Urban Planners in Wisconsin are responsible for developing programs and plans for land use in their jurisdiction. They analyze various factors such as population growth, infrastructure, and even with the ICIS's primary focus, Information Systems, to make comprehensive and informed decisions. To better understand the potential income for this career in Wisconsin, you may wish to explore how much do urban planners make in Wisconsin. This will help you understand the financial viability of a career in urban planning in Wisconsin, allowing you to align your conference learnings with your career goals. Ultimately, while the focus of the conference is to disseminate and exchange knowledge, having context regarding real-world applications and job prospects can provide a holistic conference experience. Consider this approach to maximize the impact of what you learn and how it can enhance your career development.