Ranking & Metrics Conference Call for Papers Other Conferences in United States
2022 IEEE Spoken Language Technology Workshop (SLT 2022)

2022 IEEE Spoken Language Technology Workshop (SLT 2022)

Doha, Qatar

Submission Deadline: Friday 01 Jul 2022

Conference Dates: Jan 09, 2023 - Jan 12, 2023

Research
Impact Score 4.90

OFFICIAL WEBSITE

Conference Organizers: Deadline extended?
Click here to edit

Ranking & Metrics Impact Score is a novel metric devised to rank conferences based on the number of contributing the best scientists in addition to the h-index estimated from the scientific papers published by the best scientists. See more details on our methodology page.

Research Impact Score: 4.90
Contributing Best Scientists: 70
H5-index:
Papers published by Best Scientists 89
Research Ranking (Computer Science) 91

Conference Call for Papers

We invite papers in all areas of spoken language processing, with
emphasis placed on the following topics:

Automatic speech recognition
Spoken language understanding
Speech-to-text systems
Spoken dialog systems
Multilingual language processing
Robustness in automatic speech recognition
Spoken document retrieval
Speech-to-speech translation
Text-to-speech systems
Spontaneous speech processing
Speech summarization
New applications of automatic speech recognition
Speaker and language recognition
End-to-end/joint training of speech enhancement and recognition

Overview

Top Research Topics at Spoken Language Technology Workshop?

  • Speech recognition (63.16%)
  • Artificial intelligence (61.84%)
  • Natural language processing (39.98%)

The primary areas of discussion in the conference are Speech recognition, Artificial intelligence, Natural language processing, Artificial neural network and Hidden Markov model. The event focuses on Speech recognition but the discussions also offer insight into other areas such as Data modeling, Feature extraction and Word (computer architecture). The studies tackled, which mainly focus on Feature extraction, apply to Feature (machine learning) as well.

The in-depth study on Word (computer architecture) also explores topics in the intersecting field of Vocabulary. The work on Artificial intelligence tackled in it brings together disciplines like Context (language use), Machine learning and Pattern recognition. Speaker recognition is the primary subject of Pattern recognition works presented in the conference.

The research on Natural language processing featured in it combines topics in other fields like Speech corpus, Utterance, Dialog box and Task analysis. The Hidden Markov model study featured in the event draws connections with the study of Speech synthesis. Some problems in Language model that were presented in it overlapped with concepts under Recurrent neural network and Decoding methods.

What are the most cited papers published at the conference?

  • Context dependent recurrent neural network language model (483 citations)
  • Speaker Recognition from Raw Waveform with SincNet (259 citations)
  • Spoken language understanding using long short-term memory neural networks (254 citations)

Research areas of the most cited articles at Spoken Language Technology Workshop:

The published articles focus largely on the fields of Artificial intelligence, Speech recognition, Natural language processing, Artificial neural network and Feature extraction. The featured Artificial intelligence studies in the published papers mainly concentrate on Pattern recognition but also cover areas of interest in Representation (mathematics). In addition to Speech recognition research, the most cited papers aim to explore topics under Recurrent neural network, Word (computer architecture) and Decoding methods.

Papers citation over time

A key indicator for each conference is its effectiveness in reaching other researchers with the papers published at that venue.

The chart below presents the interquartile range (first quartile 25%, median 50% and third quartile 75%) of the number of citations of articles over time.

Research.com

The top authors publishing at Spoken Language Technology Workshop (based on the number of publications) are:

  • Dilek Hakkani-Tur (14 papers) published 5 papers at the last edition, 2 more than at the previous edition,
  • Steve Young (8 papers) published 2 papers at the last edition, 1 less than at the previous edition,
  • Gokhan Tur (8 papers) published 3 papers at the last edition, 1 more than at the previous edition,
  • Giuseppe Riccardi (7 papers) published 1 paper at the last edition, 1 less than at the previous edition,
  • Florian Metze (7 papers) published 4 papers at the last edition, 2 more than at the previous edition.

The overall trend for top authors publishing at this conference is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the conference for top authors.

Research.com

Only papers with recognized affiliations are considered

The top affiliations publishing at Spoken Language Technology Workshop (based on the number of publications) are:

  • Microsoft (29 papers) published 12 papers at the last edition, 3 more than at the previous edition,
  • Carnegie Mellon University (25 papers) published 8 papers at the last edition, 1 more than at the previous edition,
  • IBM (12 papers) published 4 papers at the last edition, 2 more than at the previous edition,
  • University of Washington (11 papers) published 3 papers at the last edition, 1 more than at the previous edition,
  • University of Cambridge (11 papers) published 3 papers at the last edition, 1 less than at the previous edition.

The overall trend for top affiliations publishing at this conference is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the conference for top affiliations.

Research.com

Publication chance based on affiliation

The publication chance index shows the ratio of articles published by the best research institutions at the conference edition to all articles published within that conference. The best research institutions were selected based on the largest number of articles published during all editions of the conference.

The chart below presents the percentage ratio of articles from top institutions (based on their ranking of total papers).Top affiliations were grouped by their rank into the following tiers: top 1-10, top 11-20, top 21-50, and top 51+. Only articles with a recognized affiliation are considered.

Research.com

During the most recent 2014 edition, 0.97% of publications had an unrecognized affiliation. Out of the publications with recognized affiliations, 42.16% were posted by at least one author from the top 10 institutions publishing at the conference. Another 12.75% included authors affiliated with research institutions from the top 11-20 affiliations. Institutions from the 21-50 range included 25.49% of all publications and 19.61% were from other institutions.

Returning Authors Index

A very common phenomenon observed among researchers publishing scientific articles is the intentional selection of conferences they have already attended in the past. In particular, it is worth analyzing the case when the authors participate in the same conference from year to year.

The Returning Authors Index presented below illustrates the ratio of authors who participated in both a given as well as the previous edition of the conference in relation to all participants in a given year.

Research.com

Returning Institution Index

The graph below shows the Returning Institution Index, illustrating the ratio of institutions that participated in both a given and the previous edition of the conference in relation to all affiliations present in a given year.

Research.com

The experience to innovation index

Our experience to innovation index was created to show a cross-section of the experience level of authors publishing at a conference. The index includes the authors publishing at the last edition of a conference, grouped by total number of publications throughout their academic career (P) and the total number of citations of these publications ever received (C).

The group intervals were selected empirically to best show the diversity of the authors' experiences, their labels were selected as a convenience, not as judgment. The authors were divided into the following groups:

  • Novice - P < 5 or C < 25 (the number of publications less than 5 or the number of citations less than 25),
  • Competent - P < 10 or C < 100 (the number of publications less than 10 or the number of citations less than 100),
  • Experienced - P < 25 or C < 625 (the number of publications less than 25 or the number of citations less than 625),
  • Master - P < 50 or C < 2500 (the number of publications less than 50 or the number of citations less than 2500),
  • Star - P ≥ 50 and C ≥ 2500 (both the number of publications greater than 50 and the number of citations greater than 2500).

Research.com

The chart below illustrates experience levels of first authors in cases of publications with multiple authors.

Research.com

Previous Editions

Something went wrong. Please try again later.