World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
30
Citations
2883
World Ranking
7767
National Ranking
115

Zi 晏子 Yan publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Zi 晏子 Yan sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 302 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 159 publications — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Zi 晏子 Yan D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Zi 晏子 Yan sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 261 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 30 D-Index — 2nd percentile

2% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • A cyclical self-assessment process: towards a model of how students engage in self-assessment

    Zi Yan;Gavin Thomas Lumsden Brown

  • Self-assessment in the process of self-regulated learning and its relationship with academic achievement

    Unknown

  • A systematic review on factors influencing teachers’ intentions and implementations regarding formative assessment

    Zi Yan;Ziqi Li;Ernesto Panadero;Min Yang

  • Self-assessment is about more than self: The enabling role of feedback literacy

    Zi Yan;David Carless

  • Inclusive education: teachers' intentions and behaviour analysed from the viewpoint of the theory of planned behaviour

    Zi 晏子 Yan;Kuen Fung 冼權鋒 Sin

  • Primary teachers' attitudes, intentions and practices regarding formative assessment

    Unknown

  • Diverse delivery methods and strong psychological benefits: A review of online formative assessment

    Unknown

  • The effect of self-assessment on academic performance and the role of explicitness: a meta-analysis

    Unknown

  • Effects of self-assessment and peer-assessment interventions on academic performance: A pairwise and network meta-analysis

    Unknown

  • Supporting students’ intrinsic motivation for online learning tasks: The effect of need-supportive task instructions on motivation, self-assessment, and task performance

    Unknown

  • Assessment for learning in the Hong Kong assessment reform: A case of policy borrowing

    Zi Yan;Gavin T.L. Brown;Gavin T.L. Brown

  • Measuring what learners do in feedback: the feedback literacy behaviour scale

    Unknown

  • Effects of self-assessment diaries on academic achievement, self-regulation, and motivation

    Zi Yan;Ming Ming Chiu;Po Yuk Ko

  • Student self-assessment: why do they do it?

    Zi Yan;Gavin T. L. Brown;John Chi-Kin Lee;Xue-Lan Qiu

  • Assessing Teachers’ Strategies in Formative Assessment: The Teacher Formative Assessment Practice Scale

    Unknown

  • Student self-assessment practices: the role of gender, school level and goal orientation

    Unknown

  • Students’ engagement with ChatGPT feedback: implications for student feedback literacy in the context of generative artificial intelligence

    Unknown

  • Effects of online peer assessment on higher‐order thinking: A meta‐analysis

    Unknown

  • A Systematic Review on Students’ Perceptions of Self-Assessment: Usefulness and Factors Influencing Implementation

    Unknown

  • How teachers’ beliefs and demographic variables impact on self-regulated learning instruction

    Unknown

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Recently Published Articles