World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
37
Citations
22432
World Ranking
10425
National Ranking
4352

Yann N. Dauphin publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Yann N. Dauphin sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 61 publications — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Yann N. Dauphin D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Yann N. Dauphin sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Yann N. Dauphin is a researcher primarily affiliated with Google in the United States. Their body of work is situated within the field of computer science, with a focus on artificial intelligence, computer vision and pattern recognition, health informatics, signal processing, and safety research.

Their research interests cover a range of topics, including:

  • Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
  • Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Machine Learning and Data Classification
  • Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis
  • Machine Learning and Extreme Learning Machines (ELM)
  • Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
  • Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning

Dauphin has contributed substantially to the academic literature, with publications primarily in prominent venues such as arXiv (Cornell University), the Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, PLoS ONE, and the Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (Schloss Dagstuhl).

Some of the recent papers authored or co-authored by Dauphin include:

  • Static Analysis of Shape in TensorFlow Programs, 2020, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Mixup: Beyond empirical risk minimization, 2024, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Continental-Scale Building Detection from High Resolution Satellite Imagery, 2021, Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (Schloss Dagstuhl)
  • Argmax Flows and Multinomial Diffusion: Learning Categorical Distributions, 2021, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Gradient Flow in Sparse Neural Networks and How Lottery Tickets Win, 2022, Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence

Their collaborations include frequent co-authorship with individuals such as:

  • Alina Beygelzimer
  • Percy Liang
  • Utku Evci
  • Atish Agarwala
  • Ekin D. Cubuk

Throughout their career, Dauphin has maintained a focus on advancing machine learning techniques, particularly in areas that intersect with neural networks and domain adaptation challenges. Their work has been disseminated through a variety of channels favored in the AI research community, reflecting engagement with both theoretical and applied aspects of artificial intelligence.

Best Publications

  • mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimization

    Hongyi Zhang;Moustapha Cisse;Yann N. Dauphin;David Lopez-Paz

  • Convolutional Sequence to Sequence Learning

    Jonas Gehring;Michael Auli;David Grangier;Denis Yarats

  • Theano: A Python framework for fast computation of mathematical expressions

    Rami Al-Rfou;Guillaume Alain;Amjad Almahairi

  • Language modeling with gated convolutional networks

    Yann N. Dauphin;Angela Fan;Michael Auli;David Grangier

  • Identifying and attacking the saddle point problem in high-dimensional non-convex optimization

    Yann N Dauphin;Razvan Pascanu;Caglar Gulcehre;Kyunghyun Cho

  • Hierarchical Neural Story Generation

    Angela Fan;Mike Lewis;Yann N. Dauphin

  • Using recurrent neural networks for slot filling in spoken language understanding

    Grégoire Mesnil;Yann Dauphin;Kaisheng Yao;Yoshua Bengio

  • Parseval networks: improving robustness to adversarial examples

    Moustapha Cisse;Piotr Bojanowski;Edouard Grave;Yann Dauphin

  • Pay Less Attention with Lightweight and Dynamic Convolutions

    Felix Wu;Angela Fan;Alexei Baevski;Yann N. Dauphin

  • EmoNets: Multimodal deep learning approaches for emotion recognition in video

    Samira Ebrahimi Kahou;Xavier Bouthillier;Pascal Lamblin;Çaglar Gülçehre

  • A Convolutional Encoder Model for Neural Machine Translation

    Jonas Gehring;Michael Auli;David Grangier;Yann N. Dauphin

  • Combining modality specific deep neural networks for emotion recognition in video

    Samira Ebrahimi Kahou;Christopher Pal;Xavier Bouthillier;Pierre Froumenty

  • Unsupervised and Transfer Learning Challenge: a Deep Learning Approach

    Grégoire Mesnil;Yann N. Dauphin;Xavier Glorot;Salah Rifai

  • Deal or No Deal? End-to-End Learning of Negotiation Dialogues

    Mike Lewis;Denis Yarats;Yann N. Dauphin;Devi Parikh

  • Better Mixing via Deep Representations

    Yoshua Bengio;Gregoire Mesnil;Gregoire Mesnil;Yann Dauphin;Salah Rifai

  • Higher order contractive auto-encoder

    Salah Rifai;Grégoire Mesnil;Pascal Vincent;Xavier Muller

  • The Manifold Tangent Classifier

    Salah Rifai;Yann N Dauphin;Pascal Vincent;Yoshua Bengio

  • Equilibrated adaptive learning rates for non-convex optimization

    Yann N. Dauphin;Harm de Vries;Yoshua Bengio

  • Strategies for Structuring Story Generation

    Angela Fan;Mike Lewis;Yann N. Dauphin

  • Empirical Analysis of the Hessian of Over-Parametrized Neural Networks

    Levent Sagun;Utku Evci;V. Ugur Güney;Yann N. Dauphin

  • RMSProp and equilibrated adaptive learning rates for non-convex optimization.

    Yann N. Dauphin;Harm de Vries;Junyoung Chung;Yoshua Bengio

  • Deal or No Deal? End-to-End Learning for Negotiation Dialogues

    Mike Lewis;Denis Yarats;Yann N. Dauphin;Devi Parikh

Frequent Co-Authors

Yoshua Bengio
Yoshua Bengio University of Montreal
Michael Auli
Michael Auli Facebook (United States)
David Grangier
David Grangier Google (United States)
Pascal Vincent
Pascal Vincent Facebook (United States)
Aaron Courville
Aaron Courville University of Montreal
Gokhan Tur
Gokhan Tur Amazon (United States)
Larry P. Heck
Larry P. Heck Georgia Institute of Technology
Dilek Hakkani-Tur
Dilek Hakkani-Tur University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Michael Lewis
Michael Lewis University of Pittsburgh
Caglar Gulcehre
Caglar Gulcehre DeepMind (United Kingdom)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online education opens up numerous flexible and affordable opportunities for those interested in Computer Science and related fields. If you’re seeking an advanced credential, you might consider a cheap doctorate degree online. These programs can provide specialized expertise without the financial burden of traditional, on-campus options.

For educators or professionals looking to quickly advance, 1 year edd programs online offer efficient pathways to earning a Doctor of Education in as little as twelve months. Similarly, those new to higher education can look into an accelerated associate degree online, which allows students to earn their qualifications in a short time frame—sometimes just six months.

If your interests intersect with technology and business, an affordable online business degree can provide versatile skills that complement Computer Science, such as management and entrepreneurship. These varied online pathways make career growth more accessible and customizable for busy adults and working professionals.

Best Scientists Citing Yann N. Dauphin

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles