| Discipline name | D-Index | World Ranking | Current World Ranking | National Ranking | Current National Ranking | Publications | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 49 | 5850 | 5380 | 2567 | 2317 | 89 | 19861 |
The chart shows the history of publications by Xiao-Bing Gao between 1996 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Xiao-Bing Gao published across 30 years, from 1996 to 2025, averaging 4.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 17 publications in 2025. 23 of the 133 publications appeared in the last two years.
133 publications in total across all disciplines
| Year | Publications |
|---|---|
| 1996 | 1 |
| 1997 | 0 |
| 1998 | 4 |
| 1999 | 2 |
| 2000 | 1 |
| 2001 | 4 |
| 2002 | 4 |
| 2003 | 1 |
| 2004 | 0 |
| 2005 | 2 |
| 2006 | 2 |
| 2007 | 4 |
| 2008 | 3 |
| 2009 | 5 |
| 2010 | 6 |
| 2011 | 7 |
| 2012 | 3 |
| 2013 | 4 |
| 2014 | 2 |
| 2015 | 3 |
| 2016 | 5 |
| 2017 | 5 |
| 2018 | 4 |
| 2019 | 7 |
| 2020 | 8 |
| 2021 | 8 |
| 2022 | 10 |
| 2023 | 5 |
| 2024 | 6 |
| 2025 | 17 |
| Total | 133 |
The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Xiao-Bing Gao sits on this spectrum.
This scientist: 89 publications — 11th percentile
11% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.
The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.
| Publications | Scientists | This scientist |
|---|---|---|
| 38–47 | 18 | |
| 48–57 | 79 | |
| 58–67 | 193 | |
| 68–77 | 323 | |
| 78–87 | 406 | |
| 88–97 | 452 | 89 |
| 98–107 | 539 | |
| 108–117 | 505 | |
| 118–127 | 522 | |
| 128–137 | 469 | |
| 138–147 | 456 | |
| 148–157 | 459 | |
| 158–167 | 397 | |
| 168–177 | 383 | |
| 178–187 | 350 | |
| 188–197 | 302 | |
| 198–207 | 306 | |
| 208–217 | 262 | |
| 218–227 | 242 | |
| 228–237 | 220 | |
| 238–247 | 203 | |
| 248–257 | 174 | |
| 258–267 | 176 | |
| 268–277 | 175 | |
| 278–287 | 125 | |
| 288–297 | 116 | |
| 298–307 | 127 | |
| 308–317 | 128 | |
| 318–327 | 99 | |
| 328–337 | 89 | |
| 338–347 | 78 | |
| 348–357 | 96 | |
| 358–367 | 66 | |
| 368–377 | 59 | |
| 378–387 | 65 | |
| 388–397 | 54 | |
| 398–407 | 48 | |
| 408–417 | 49 | |
| 418–427 | 34 | |
| 428–437 | 31 | |
| 438–447 | 30 | |
| 448–457 | 31 | |
| 458–467 | 36 | |
| 468–477 | 40 | |
| 478–487 | 35 | |
| 488–497 | 30 | |
| 498–507 | 23 | |
| 508–517 | 26 | |
| 518–527 | 20 | |
| 528–537 | 23 | |
| 538–547 | 20 | |
| 548–557 | 20 | |
| 558–567 | 17 | |
| 568–577 | 14 | |
| 578–587 | 20 | |
| 588–597 | 20 | |
| 598–607 | 19 | |
| 608–617 | 18 | |
| 618–627 | 17 | |
| 628–637 | 11 | |
| 638–647 | 11 | |
| 648–657 | 11 | |
| 658–667 | 8 | |
| 668–677 | 7 | |
| 678–687 | 11 | |
| 688–697 | 10 | |
| 698–707 | 4 | |
| 708–717 | 6 | |
| 718–727 | 5 | |
| 728–737 | 5 | |
| 738–747 | 9 | |
| 748–757 | 9 | |
| 758–767 | 3 | |
| 768–777 | 7 | |
| 778–787 | 7 | |
| 788–797 | 6 | |
| 798–807 | 2 | |
| 808–817 | 2 | |
| 818–827 | 7 | |
| 828–837 | 0 | |
| 838–847 | 9 | |
| 848–857 | 3 | |
| 858–867 | 1 | |
| 868–877 | 3 | |
| 878–886 | 6 | |
| 887+ | 100 |
The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Xiao-Bing Gao sits on this spectrum.
This scientist: 49 D-Index — 39th percentile
39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.
The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.
| D-Index | Scientists | This scientist |
|---|---|---|
| 30–31 | 42 | |
| 32–33 | 172 | |
| 34–35 | 296 | |
| 36–37 | 435 | |
| 38–39 | 459 | |
| 40–41 | 456 | |
| 42–43 | 467 | |
| 44–45 | 478 | |
| 46–47 | 512 | |
| 48–49 | 435 | 49 |
| 50–51 | 425 | |
| 52–53 | 418 | |
| 54–55 | 392 | |
| 56–57 | 357 | |
| 58–59 | 334 | |
| 60–61 | 328 | |
| 62–63 | 260 | |
| 64–65 | 278 | |
| 66–67 | 239 | |
| 68–69 | 250 | |
| 70–71 | 210 | |
| 72–73 | 200 | |
| 74–75 | 189 | |
| 76–77 | 170 | |
| 78–79 | 146 | |
| 80–81 | 113 | |
| 82–83 | 126 | |
| 84–85 | 100 | |
| 86–87 | 84 | |
| 88–89 | 99 | |
| 90–91 | 84 | |
| 92–93 | 85 | |
| 94–95 | 72 | |
| 96–97 | 76 | |
| 98–99 | 45 | |
| 100–101 | 49 | |
| 102–103 | 43 | |
| 104–105 | 32 | |
| 106–107 | 45 | |
| 108–109 | 50 | |
| 110–111 | 32 | |
| 112–113 | 39 | |
| 114–115 | 32 | |
| 116–117 | 29 | |
| 118–119 | 27 | |
| 120–121 | 19 | |
| 122–123 | 23 | |
| 124–125 | 27 | |
| 126–127 | 16 | |
| 128–129 | 24 | |
| 130–131 | 13 | |
| 132–133 | 21 | |
| 134–135 | 17 | |
| 136–137 | 14 | |
| 138–139 | 15 | |
| 140–141 | 10 | |
| 142–143 | 10 | |
| 144–145 | 13 | |
| 146–147 | 9 | |
| 148–149 | 8 | |
| 150–151 | 6 | |
| 152–153 | 6 | |
| 154–155 | 7 | |
| 156–157 | 7 | |
| 158–159 | 10 | |
| 160–161 | 4 | |
| 162 | 8 | |
| 163+ | 100 |
L. de Lecea;T. S. Kilduff;C. Peyron;X.-B. Gao
Alfonso Abizaid;Zhong-Wu Liu;Zane Bruce Andrews;Marya Shanabrough
Jonathan D. Hommel;Richard Trinko;Richard Trinko;Robert M. Sears;Dan Georgescu
Zane B. Andrews;Zhong-Wu Liu;Nicholas Walllingford;Derek M. Erion
Vijay K. Yadav;Franck Oury;Nina Suda;Zhong Wu Liu
Tamir S. Aldad;Geliang Gan;Xiao-Bing Gao;Hugh S. Taylor
Wenfei Han;Wenfei Han;Luis A. Tellez;Matthew H. Perkins;Isaac O. Perez
Anthony N. van den Pol;Anthony N. van den Pol;Xiao-Bing Gao;Karl Obrietan;Thomas S. Kilduff
Ying Li;Xiao Bing Gao;Takeshi Sakurai;Anthony N van den Pol
Yann S. Mineur;Alfonso Abizaid;Yan Rao;Ramiro Salas
Qian Gao;Gabor Mezei;Yongzhan Nie;Yan Rao
Marco Koch;Luis Varela;Jae Geun Kim;Jung Dae Kim
Franck Oury;Lori Khrimian;Christine A. Denny;Antoine Gardin
Anna Coppola;Zhong-Wu Liu;Zane Bruce Andrews;Eric Paradis
Zane Bruce Andrews;Derek Erion;Rudolph Beiler;Zhong-Wu Liu
Sabrina Diano;Zhong Wu Liu;Jin Kwon Jeong;Marcelo O. Dietrich;Marcelo O. Dietrich
Marco Onorati;Zhen Li;Fuchen Liu;André M.M. Sousa
Lori Khrimian;Arnaud Obri;Mariana Ramos-Brossier;Mariana Ramos-Brossier;Audrey Rousseaud;Audrey Rousseaud
Zhong Wu Liu;Ugo Faraguna;Chiara Cirelli;Giulio Tononi
Marcelo O. Dietrich;Catiele Antunes;Gan Geliang;Zhong-Wu Liu
If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.