World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Biology and Biochemistry
Netherlands
2023

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
92
Citations
27229
World Ranking
2238
National Ranking
50

Medicine

D-Index
92
Citations
27503
World Ranking
11413
National Ranking
445

Wouter H. Lamers publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Wouter H. Lamers sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 433 publications — 92nd percentile

92% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Wouter H. Lamers D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Wouter H. Lamers sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 92 D-Index — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2023 - Research.com Biology and Biochemistry in Netherlands Leader Award

Overview

Wouter H. Lamers is affiliated with Maastricht University in the Netherlands and has contributed extensively to the fields of Medicine and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology. Their research spans a variety of subfields including Molecular Biology, Epidemiology, Surgery, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, and Developmental Neuroscience.

The main topics covered by Wouter H. Lamers include congenital heart defects research, congenital heart disease studies, cardiovascular function and risk factors, neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms, cardiac arrhythmias and treatments, urological disorders and treatments, and tissue engineering and regenerative medicine.

Lamers has published research in numerous venues, with frequent publications appearing in the Journal of Anatomy, Clinical Anatomy, Communications Biology, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), and Biochemical Pharmacology.

Notable recent papers include:

  • Amino acid metabolism, transport and signalling in the liver revisited, 2022, Biochemical Pharmacology
  • A pictorial account of the human embryonic heart between 3.5 and 8 weeks of development, 2022, Communications Biology
  • The development and structure of the mesentery, 2021, Communications Biology
  • Evidence for glutamine synthetase function in mouse spinal cord oligodendrocytes, 2021, Glia
  • Development of the arterial roots and ventricular outflow tracts, 2023, Journal of Anatomy

Frequent collaborators include Jill P. J. M. Hikspoors, Robert H. Anderson, E. Köhler, Nutmethee Kruepunga, and Greet M. C. Mommen. The ongoing partnerships with these colleagues have contributed to a significant portion of Lamers' published research.

Best Publications

  • Chamber formation and morphogenesis in the developing mammalian heart.

    Vincent M. Christoffels;Petra E.M.H. Habets;Diego Franco;Marina Campione

  • Defects in cardiac outflow tract formation and pro-B-lymphocyte expansion in mice lacking Sox-4

    M W Schilham;M A Oosterwegel;P Moerer;J Ya

  • Electroporation in ‘intracellular’ buffer increases cell survival

    M. J. B. Van Den Hoff;A. F. M. Moorman;W. H. Lamers

  • cAMP stimulates transcription of the gene for cytosolic phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase in rat liver nuclei.

    Wouter H. Lamers;Richard W. Hanson;Herman M. Meisner

  • New targets of beta-catenin signaling in the liver are involved in the glutamine metabolism.

    Axelle Cadoret;Christine Ovejero;Benoit Terris;Evelyne Souil

  • Two members of the Tcf family implicated in Wnt/beta-catenin signaling during embryogenesis in the mouse

    Vladimir Korinek;Nick Barker;Karl Willert;Miranda Molenaar

  • Defective vascular development in connexin 45-deficient mice

    Olaf Krüger;Achim Plum;Jung-Sun Kim;Elke Winterhager

  • DEVELOPMENT OF THE HEART: (1) FORMATION OF THE CARDIAC CHAMBERS AND ARTERIAL TRUNKS

    Antoon Moorman;Sandra Webb;Nigel A Brown;Wouter Lamers

  • Unique and shared functions of different connexins in mice

    A. Plum;G. Hallas;T. Magin;F. Dombrowski

  • Pharmacologic or Genetic Targeting of Glutamine Synthetase Skews Macrophages toward an M1-like Phenotype and Inhibits Tumor Metastasis

    Erika M. Palmieri;Alessio Menga;Rosa Martín-Pérez;Annamaria Quinto

  • Development of the Cardiac Conduction System

    A. F. M. Moorman;F. De Jong;M. M. F. J. Denyn;W. H. Lamers

  • Persisting zones of slow impulse conduction in developing chicken hearts.

    F. De Jong;T. Opthof;A. A. M. Wilde;M. J. Janse

  • Formation of the Tricuspid Valve in the Human Heart

    Wouter H. Lamers;Szabolcs Virágh;Andy Wessels;Antoon F.M. Moorman

  • Spatial distribution of connexin43, the major cardiac gap junction protein, in the developing and adult rat heart.

    M. J. A. Van Kempen;C. Fromaget;D. Gros;A. F. M. Moorman

  • Development of the heart: (3) formation of the ventricular outflow tracts, arterial valves, and intrapericardial arterial trunks

    Robert H Anderson;Sandra Webb;Nigel A Brown;Wouter Lamers

  • Spatial distribution of “tissue‐specific” antigens in the developing human heart and skeletal muscle III. An immunohistochemical analysis of the distribution of the neural tissue antigen G1N2 in the embryonic heart; implications for the development of the atrioventricular conduction system

    A. Wessels;J. L. M. Vermeulen;F. J. Verbeek;S. Z. Virágh

  • Factor correction as a tool to eliminate between-session variation in replicate experiments: application to molecular biology and retrovirology

    Jan M. Ruijter;Helene H. Thygesen;Onard J. L. M. Schoneveld;Onard J. L. M. Schoneveld;Atze T. Das

  • Myocardialization of the cardiac outflow tract.

    M. J. B. Van Den Hoff;A. F. M. Moorman;J. M. Ruijter;W. H. Lamers

  • The Development of the Atrioventricular Junction in the Human Heart

    A. Wessels;M.W.M. Markman;J.L.M. Vermeulen;R.H. Anderson

  • Possible roles of DLK1 in the Notch pathway during development and disease

    Farah A. Falix;Daniël C. Aronson;Wouter H. Lamers;Ingrid C. Gaemers

Frequent Co-Authors

Antoon F.M. Moorman
Antoon F.M. Moorman University of Amsterdam
Nicolaas E. P. Deutz
Nicolaas E. P. Deutz Texas A&M University
Annemie M. W. J. Schols
Annemie M. W. J. Schols Maastricht University
Maurice J.B. van den Hoff
Maurice J.B. van den Hoff University of Amsterdam
Cornelis H.C. Dejong
Cornelis H.C. Dejong Maastricht University
Vincent M. Christoffels
Vincent M. Christoffels University of Amsterdam
Robert H. Anderson
Robert H. Anderson Newcastle University
Matthew E. Poynter
Matthew E. Poynter University of Vermont
Ronald P.J. Oude Elferink
Ronald P.J. Oude Elferink University of Amsterdam
Wilmar M. Wiersinga
Wilmar M. Wiersinga University of Amsterdam

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Wouter H. Lamers

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles