World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering 34 2945 2767 37 35 145 3226

Unai Fernandez-Gamiz publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Unai Fernandez-Gamiz between 2011 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Unai Fernandez-Gamiz published across 15 years, from 2011 to 2025, averaging 13.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 38 publications in 2023. 45 of the 199 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2011 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 38. Peak 38 publications in 2023. 2011: 1 publication 2012: 0 publications 2013: 3 publications 2014: 1 publication 2015: 1 publication 2016: 3 publications 2017: 11 publications 2018: 10 publications 2019: 15 publications 2020: 18 publications 2021: 17 publications 2022: 36 publications 2023: 38 publications 2024: 27 publications 2025: 18 publications
2011 2025

199 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Unai Fernandez-Gamiz: publications per year, 2011 to 2025
Year Publications
2011 1
2012 0
2013 3
2014 1
2015 1
2016 3
2017 11
2018 10
2019 15
2020 18
2021 17
2022 36
2023 38
2024 27
2025 18
Total 199
Download as CSV

Unai Fernandez-Gamiz publication distribution in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Unai Fernandez-Gamiz sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 63 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 659+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 155. Most scientists, 155, have 147–156 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 137–146 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 10 scientists 57–66 publications: 23 scientists 67–76 publications: 32 scientists 77–86 publications: 62 scientists 87–96 publications: 67 scientists 97–106 publications: 91 scientists 107–116 publications: 113 scientists 117–126 publications: 115 scientists 127–136 publications: 130 scientists 137–146 publications: 140 scientists 147–156 publications: 155 scientists 157–166 publications: 132 scientists 167–176 publications: 133 scientists 177–186 publications: 130 scientists 187–196 publications: 140 scientists 197–206 publications: 115 scientists 207–216 publications: 125 scientists 217–226 publications: 117 scientists 227–236 publications: 99 scientists 237–246 publications: 92 scientists 247–256 publications: 100 scientists 257–266 publications: 95 scientists 267–276 publications: 88 scientists 277–286 publications: 77 scientists 287–296 publications: 74 scientists 297–306 publications: 74 scientists 307–316 publications: 62 scientists 317–326 publications: 70 scientists 327–336 publications: 59 scientists 337–346 publications: 58 scientists 347–356 publications: 45 scientists 357–366 publications: 44 scientists 367–376 publications: 36 scientists 377–386 publications: 41 scientists 387–396 publications: 32 scientists 397–406 publications: 23 scientists 407–416 publications: 28 scientists 417–426 publications: 27 scientists 427–436 publications: 25 scientists 437–446 publications: 23 scientists 447–456 publications: 23 scientists 457–466 publications: 20 scientists 467–476 publications: 12 scientists 477–486 publications: 24 scientists 487–496 publications: 18 scientists 497–506 publications: 12 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 21 scientists 527–536 publications: 12 scientists 537–546 publications: 8 scientists 547–556 publications: 16 scientists 557–566 publications: 3 scientists 567–576 publications: 11 scientists 577–586 publications: 6 scientists 587–596 publications: 5 scientists 597–606 publications: 6 scientists 607–616 publications: 7 scientists 617–626 publications: 7 scientists 627–636 publications: 10 scientists 637–646 publications: 4 scientists 647–656 publications: 3 scientists 657–658 publications: 2 scientists 659+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 659+

This scientist: 145 publications — 22nd percentile

22% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,445 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 10
57–66 23
67–76 32
77–86 62
87–96 67
97–106 91
107–116 113
117–126 115
127–136 130
137–146 140 145
147–156 155
157–166 132
167–176 133
177–186 130
187–196 140
197–206 115
207–216 125
217–226 117
227–236 99
237–246 92
247–256 100
257–266 95
267–276 88
277–286 77
287–296 74
297–306 74
307–316 62
317–326 70
327–336 59
337–346 58
347–356 45
357–366 44
367–376 36
377–386 41
387–396 32
397–406 23
407–416 28
417–426 27
427–436 25
437–446 23
447–456 23
457–466 20
467–476 12
477–486 24
487–496 18
497–506 12
507–516 13
517–526 21
527–536 12
537–546 8
547–556 16
557–566 3
567–576 11
577–586 6
587–596 5
597–606 6
607–616 7
617–626 7
627–636 10
637–646 4
647–656 3
657–658 2
659+ 100
Download as CSV

Unai Fernandez-Gamiz D-index placement in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Unai Fernandez-Gamiz sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 64 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 93+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 189. Most scientists, 189, have 34 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 34 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 83 scientists 31 D-Index: 113 scientists 32 D-Index: 144 scientists 33 D-Index: 153 scientists 34 D-Index: 189 scientists 35 D-Index: 158 scientists 36 D-Index: 139 scientists 37 D-Index: 127 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 126 scientists 40 D-Index: 104 scientists 41 D-Index: 100 scientists 42 D-Index: 107 scientists 43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44 D-Index: 103 scientists 45 D-Index: 79 scientists 46 D-Index: 88 scientists 47 D-Index: 70 scientists 48 D-Index: 83 scientists 49 D-Index: 44 scientists 50 D-Index: 64 scientists 51 D-Index: 56 scientists 52 D-Index: 50 scientists 53 D-Index: 48 scientists 54 D-Index: 58 scientists 55 D-Index: 52 scientists 56 D-Index: 48 scientists 57 D-Index: 42 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 37 scientists 61 D-Index: 42 scientists 62 D-Index: 44 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 33 scientists 65 D-Index: 29 scientists 66 D-Index: 23 scientists 67 D-Index: 29 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 19 scientists 70 D-Index: 34 scientists 71 D-Index: 26 scientists 72 D-Index: 19 scientists 73 D-Index: 18 scientists 74 D-Index: 19 scientists 75 D-Index: 14 scientists 76 D-Index: 19 scientists 77 D-Index: 8 scientists 78 D-Index: 18 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 17 scientists 82 D-Index: 11 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 7 scientists 85 D-Index: 9 scientists 86 D-Index: 8 scientists 87 D-Index: 6 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 10 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 4 scientists 93+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 93+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 20th percentile

20% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,445 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 83
31 113
32 144
33 153
34 189 34
35 158
36 139
37 127
38 130
39 126
40 104
41 100
42 107
43 101
44 103
45 79
46 88
47 70
48 83
49 44
50 64
51 56
52 50
53 48
54 58
55 52
56 48
57 42
58 34
59 42
60 37
61 42
62 44
63 22
64 33
65 29
66 23
67 29
68 24
69 19
70 34
71 26
72 19
73 18
74 19
75 14
76 19
77 8
78 18
79 16
80 12
81 17
82 11
83 16
84 7
85 9
86 8
87 6
88 6
89 7
90 10
91 4
92 4
93+ 100
Download as CSV

Best Publications

  • Effects of thermophoresis and Brownian motion for thermal and chemically reacting Casson nanofluid flow over a linearly stretching sheet

    Unknown

  • Heat and mass transfer analysis of radiative and chemical reactive effects on MHD nanofluid over an infinite moving vertical plate

    Unknown

  • Artificial Neural Network Based Reinforcement Learning for Wind Turbine Yaw Control

    Unknown

  • Bayesian regularization networks for micropolar ternary hybrid nanofluid flow of blood with homogeneous and heterogeneous reactions: Entropy generation optimization

    Unknown

  • The effects of MHD radiating and non-uniform heat source/sink with heating on the momentum and heat transfer of Eyring-Powell fluid over a stretching

    Unknown

  • Five Megawatt Wind Turbine Power Output Improvements by Passive Flow Control Devices

    Unknown

  • Vanadium Redox Flow Batteries: A Review Oriented to Fluid-Dynamic Optimization

    Unknown

  • Darcy-Forchheimer hybrid nanofluid flow over the rotating Riga disk in the presence of chemical reaction: Artificial neural network approach

    Unknown

  • Mixed convection of thermomicropolar AgNPs-GrNPs nanofluid: An application of mass-based hybrid nanofluid model

    Unknown

  • Multi-objective Optimization of Production Scheduling Using Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithm for Hybrid Renewable Power Plants with Battery Energy Storage System

    Unknown

  • Optimization of heat transfer nanofluid blood flow through a stenosed artery in the presence of Hall effect and hematocrit dependent viscosity

    Unknown

  • Performance of magnetic dipole contribution on ferromagnetic non-Newtonian radiative MHD blood flow: An application of biotechnology and medical sciences

    Unknown

  • Analytical analysis of the magnetic field, heat generation and absorption, viscous dissipation on couple stress casson hybrid nano fluid over a nonlinear stretching surface

    Unknown

  • Performance enhancement of the artificial neural network-based reinforcement learning for wind turbine yaw control

    Unknown

  • Numerical Analysis of Unsteady Hybrid Nanofluid Flow Comprising CNTs-Ferrousoxide/Water with Variable Magnetic Field

    Unknown

  • Numerical investigation of 3-D rotating hybrid nanofluid Forchheimer flow with radiation absorption over a stretching sheet

    Unknown

  • Parametric study of low-profile vortex generators

    Unknown

  • Computational analysis of radiative heat transfer due to rotating tube in parabolic trough solar collectors with Darcy Forchheimer porous medium

    Unknown

  • Novel control algorithm for MPPT with Boost converters in photovoltaic systems

    Josean Ramos-Hernanz;Jose Manuel Lopez-Guede;Oscar Barambones;Ekaitz Zulueta

  • Testing of self-similarity and helical symmetry in vortex generator flow simulations

    Unai Fernández-Gámiz;Clara Marika Velte;Pierre-Elouan Réthoré;Niels N. Sørensen

Frequent Co-Authors

Oscar Barambones
Oscar Barambones University of the Basque Country
Manuel Graña
Manuel Graña University of the Basque Country
Eduard Egusquiza
Eduard Egusquiza Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya
Niels N. Sørensen
Niels N. Sørensen Technical University of Denmark

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring related online degrees alongside Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering can broaden your career opportunities and skill set. For those interested in combining engineering work with human-centric skills, programs like counseling provide valuable interpersonal expertise. You can find a range of options, including easy to get counseling degree programs that balance accessibility with quality education.

Similarly, accelerated programs are becoming popular for professionals aiming to upskill quickly. For example, the accelerated bcba program online offers a fast track for mastering behavioral analysis, which can complement technical expertise in designing human-machine systems.

Speech and language skills are also critical in many tech-driven fields. If you’re curious about branching into this area, it’s important to understand the prerequisites and selection process. Resources covering speech language pathology graduate programs provide valuable insights for potential applicants.

For those seeking flexible entry pathways, there are also options with varying acceptance rates to consider. Knowing which are the easiest slp grad schools to get into could help tailor your educational journey based on your goals and timeline.

Best Scientists Citing Unai Fernandez-Gamiz