World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
38
Citations
5646
World Ranking
10301
National Ranking
4320

Tomás Lang publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tomás Lang sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 175 publications — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Tomás Lang D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tomás Lang sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Tomás Lang was affiliated with the University of California, Irvine in the United States. Their research spanned multiple fields including statistics, probability and uncertainty, economics and econometrics, public health, environmental and occupational health, computational mechanics, and sociology and political science.

Lang's work covered a variety of topics such as meta-analysis and systematic reviews, health systems and economic evaluations, quality of life assessments, ethics in clinical research, the Delphi technique in research, granular flow and fluidized beds, microencapsulation and drying processes, and mineral processing and grinding.

Some of their recent published papers included the following:

  • CONSORT Harms 2022 statement, explanation, and elaboration: updated guideline for the reporting of harms in randomized trials (2023) in Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
  • Who knew? The misleading specificity of "double-blind" and what to do about it (2020) in Trials
  • The Coronavirus Pandemic: "The Show Must Not Go On" (2020) in The International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine
  • Planetary roller melt granulation (PRMG) - A new continuous method for powder processing (2023) in Powder Technology
  • Scientific abstracts: Texts, contexts, and subtexts (2022) in European Science Editing

Lang frequently published in journals such as European Science Editing, Powder Technology, Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, The Journal of the American Dental Association, and Journal of Clinical Epidemiology.

Collaborations with other researchers were a notable part of Lang's career. Frequent coauthors included Al M. Best, Barbara Greenberg, John C. Gunsolley, Effie Ioannidou, and Jens Bartsch.

Best Publications

  • Division and Square Root: Digit-Recurrence Algorithms and Implementations

    MiloTs Dragutin Ercegovac;Tomas Lang

  • Redundant and on-line CORDIC: application to matrix triangularization and SVD

    M.D. Ercegovac;T. Lang

  • Working-zone encoding for reducing the energy in microprocessor address buses

    E. Musoll;T. Lang;J. Cortadella

  • Reciprocation, square root, inverse square root, and some elementary functions using small multipliers

    M.D. Ercegovac;T. Lang;J.-M. Muller;A. Tisserand

  • Leading-one prediction with concurrent position correction

    J.D. Bruguera;T. Lang

  • Reducing TLB power requirements

    Toni Juan;Tomas Lang;Juan J. Navarro

  • A Shuffle-Exchange Network with Simplified Control

    Tomas Lang;Harold S. Stone

  • Constant-factor redundant CORDIC for angle calculation and rotation

    J.-A. Lee;T. Lang

  • Introduction to Digital Systems

    Milos D. Ercegovac;Jaime H. Moreno;Tomas Lang

  • Individual flip-flops with gated clocks for low power datapaths

    T. Lang;E. Musoll;J. Cortadella

  • Floating-point multiply-add-fused with reduced latency

    T. Lang;J.D. Bruguera

  • Fast multiplication without carry-propagate addition

    M.D. Ercegovac;T. Lang

  • Bandwidth of Crossbar and Multiple-Bus Connections for Multiprocessors

    Unknown

  • Exploiting the locality of memory references to reduce the address bus energy

    Enric Musoll;Tomás Lang;Jordi Cortadella

  • Simple radix-4 division with operands scaling

    M.D. Ercegovac;T. Lang

  • Digital systems and hardware/firmware algorithms

    Miloš D. Ercegovac;Tomás Lang

  • Very-high radix division with prescaling and selection by rounding

    M.D. Ercegovac;T. Lang;P. Montuschi

  • Floating-point fused multiply-add: reduced latency for floating-point addition

    J.D. Bruguera;T. Lang

  • Increasing the number of strides for conflict-free vector access

    Mateo Valero;Tomás Lang;José M. Llabería;Montse Peiron

  • A Radix-10 Digit-Recurrence Division Unit: Algorithm and Architecture

    T. Lang;A. Nannarelli

  • High-throughput CORDIC-based geometry operations for 3D computer graphics

    T. Lang;E. Antelo

Frequent Co-Authors

Milos D. Ercegovac
Milos D. Ercegovac University of California, Los Angeles
Mateo Valero
Mateo Valero Barcelona Supercomputing Center
Eduardo B. Fernandez
Eduardo B. Fernandez Florida Atlantic University
Eduard Ayguadé
Eduard Ayguadé Barcelona Supercomputing Center
Jordi Cortadella
Jordi Cortadella Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya
Chris M. Wood
Chris M. Wood University of British Columbia
Jesús Labarta
Jesús Labarta Barcelona Supercomputing Center
Ehud Shapiro
Ehud Shapiro Weizmann Institute of Science
Harold S. Stone
Harold S. Stone Princeton University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science in the USA opens many doors, including a variety of online degree and certification options. Today, students and professionals often seek flexible educational pathways, whether they're just starting out or advancing their careers.

If affordability is a priority, check out some of the cheapest data science masters in USA. These programs allow you to develop valuable analytics skills without accumulating excessive debt.

Interested in a broader technical field? Explore the online electrical engineering degree ranking to find high-quality programs that offer flexibility and strong career prospects.

For those looking to quickly boost employability, there are several easy certifications to get that can lead to high-paying roles in tech and related areas.

Finally, if time is a concern, explore the fastest masters degree online options. These accelerated programs are designed for students eager to quickly increase their qualifications and advance their careers in computer science or other related fields.

Best Scientists Citing Tomás Lang

Recently Published Articles