World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Thomas Meinertz

Thomas Meinertz

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
99
Citations
40637
World Ranking
8522
National Ranking
484

Thomas Meinertz publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas Meinertz sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 754 publications — 85th percentile

85% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Thomas Meinertz D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas Meinertz sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 99 D-Index — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Thomas Meinertz is affiliated with Universität Hamburg in Germany and has contributed substantially to research in the field of medicine, with a particular focus on cardiology and cardiovascular medicine. Their scholarly work spans several subfields including cardiology and cardiovascular medicine, epidemiology, pulmonary and respiratory medicine, nephrology, and neurology.

The scientist has explored a range of main topics related to cardiac health and management. These include:

  • Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
  • Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
  • Congenital Heart Disease Studies
  • Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
  • Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
  • Cardiovascular and Diving-Related Complications
  • Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches

Their recent published papers illustrate the breadth and focus of their research. Selected works include:

  • "Prognostic markers of all-cause mortality in patients with atrial fibrillation: data from the prospective long-term registry of the German Atrial Fibrillation NETwork (AFNET)", 2021, published in EP Europace
  • "Long-term outcome of perimembranous VSD closure using the Nit-Occlud® Lê VSD coil system", 2020, Clinical Research in Cardiology
  • "Versorgung von Erwachsenen mit angeborenen Herzfehlern in Deutschland - tragende Rolle von Internisten und Hausärzten", 2022, Der Internist
  • "Serum creatinine baseline fluctuation and acute kidney injury after intravenous or intra-arterial contrast agent administration-an intraindividual comparison as part of a randomized controlled trial", 2022, Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation
  • "Zu Unrecht vergessen: Carl Ludwig, Begründer der modernen Physiologie", 2021, DMW - Deutsche Medizinische Wochenschrift

Meinertz has frequently collaborated with other researchers, with notable co-authors including:

  • Peter Ewert
  • Maria Bosserdt
  • Peter Martus
  • R Tauber
  • Henryk Dreger

Their work has appeared in multiple scholarly journals and publication venues. Frequent venues of publication include:

  • EP Europace
  • Clinical Research in Cardiology
  • Der Internist
  • Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation
  • DMW - Deutsche Medizinische Wochenschrift

Best Publications

  • Endothelial Dysfunction, Oxidative Stress, and Risk of Cardiovascular Events in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease

    Thomas Heitzer;Titus Schlinzig;Karoline Krohn;Thomas Meinertz

  • Mechanisms Underlying Endothelial Dysfunction in Diabetes Mellitus

    Ulrich Hink;Huige Li;Hanke Mollnau;Mathias Oelze

  • Emergency Room Triage of Patients with Acute Chest Pain by Means of Rapid Testing for Cardiac Troponin T or Troponin I

    Christian W. Hamm;Britta U. Goldmann;Christopher Heeschen;Georg Kreymann

  • Myeloperoxidase Serum Levels Predict Risk in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes

    Stephan Baldus;Christopher Heeschen;Thomas Meinertz;Andreas M. Zeiher

  • Increased NADH-Oxidase–Mediated Superoxide Production in the Early Stages of Atherosclerosis Evidence for Involvement of the Renin-Angiotensin System

    Ascan Warnholtz;Georg Nickenig;Eberhard Schulz;Roland Macharzina

  • Effects of Angiotensin II Infusion on the Expression and Function of NAD(P)H Oxidase and Components of Nitric Oxide/cGMP Signaling

    Hanke Mollnau;Maria Wendt;Katalin Szöcs;Bernard Lassègue

  • Nickel and molybdenum contact allergies in patients with coronary in-stent restenosis

    Ralf Köster;Dieter Vieluf;Margret Kiehn;Martin Sommerauer

  • Tetrahydrobiopterin Improves Endothelium-Dependent Vasodilation in Chronic Smokers Evidence for a Dysfunctional Nitric Oxide Synthase

    Thomas Heitzer;Carsten Brockhoff;Bernd Mayer;Ascan Warnholtz

  • Outcome parameters for trials in atrial fibrillation: executive summary.

    Paulus Kirchhof;Angelo Auricchio;Jeroen Bax;Harry Crijns

  • Inhibition of the Sodium-Hydrogen Exchanger With Cariporide to Prevent Myocardial Infarction in High-Risk Ischemic Situations Main Results of the GUARDIAN Trial

    Pierre Théroux;B. R. Chaitman;N. Danchin;L. Erhardt

  • The Registry of the German Competence NETwork on Atrial Fibrillation: patient characteristics and initial management.

    Michael Nabauer;Andrea Gerth;Tobias Limbourg;Steffen Schneider

  • High-Speed Rotational Atherectomy Before Paclitaxel-Eluting Stent Implantation in Complex Calcified Coronary Lesions: The Randomized ROTAXUS (Rotational Atherectomy Prior to Taxus Stent Treatment for Complex Native Coronary Artery Disease) Trial

    Mohamed Abdel-Wahab;Gert Richardt;Heinz Joachim Büttner;Ralph Toelg

  • Myeloperoxidase mediates neutrophil activation by association with CD11b/CD18 integrins

    Denise Lau;Hanke Mollnau;Jason P. Eiserich;Bruce A. Freeman

  • Acute outcomes of MitraClip therapy for mitral regurgitation in high-surgical-risk patients: emphasis on adverse valve morphology and severe left ventricular dysfunction

    Olaf Franzen;Stephan Baldus;Volker Rudolph;Sven Meyer

  • Substrate modification combined with pulmonary vein isolation improves outcome of catheter ablation in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation : a prospective randomized comparison

    Stephan Willems;Hanno Klemm;Thomas Rostock;Benedikt Brandstrup

  • MitraClip® therapy in patients with end-stage systolic heart failure.

    Olaf Franzen;Jan van der Heyden;Stephan Baldus;Michael Schlüter

  • Prevention of atrial fibrillation after cardioversion: results of the PAFAC trial

    Thomas Fetsch;Peter Bauer;Rolf Engberding;Hans P. Koch

  • Intramural Hematoma of the Aorta Predictors of Progression to Dissection and Rupture

    Yskert von Kodolitsch;Susanne K. Csösz;Dietmar H. Koschyk;Ilka Schalwat

  • Myeloperoxidase acts as a profibrotic mediator of atrial fibrillation.

    Volker Rudolph;René P. Andrié;Tanja K. Rudolph;Kai Friedrichs

  • The German Aortic Valve Registry (GARY): in-hospital outcome.

    Christian W. Hamm;Helge Möllmann;David Holzhey;Andreas Beckmann

Frequent Co-Authors

Stephan Baldus
Stephan Baldus University of Cologne
Thomas Münzel
Thomas Münzel Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz
Christian W. Hamm
Christian W. Hamm University of Giessen
Karl-Heinz Kuck
Karl-Heinz Kuck Universität Hamburg
Paulus Kirchhof
Paulus Kirchhof University of Birmingham
Stefan H. Hohnloser
Stefan H. Hohnloser Goethe University Frankfurt
Christoph A. Nienaber
Christoph A. Nienaber National Institutes of Health
Gerhard Steinbeck
Gerhard Steinbeck Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Günter Breithardt
Günter Breithardt University of Münster
Ursula Ravens
Ursula Ravens University of Freiburg

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring medicine in the USA can open doors to a variety of related online degrees and career pathways. Many students pursue the accelerated healthcare administration degree to fast-track their entry into healthcare management roles. These programs are designed for those seeking administrative leadership positions and often can be completed in less time than traditional degrees.

For registered nurses aiming for advanced practice credentials, adn to np programs online provide a streamlined way to become a nurse practitioner. These bridge programs are flexible and allow students to balance work with study, helping them move up the nursing career ladder efficiently.

Nutrition is another promising field with growing demand. Accredited nutrition degrees online equip learners with evidence-based knowledge in dietetics, public health, and wellness. Graduates can pursue roles in hospitals, private practice, or community organizations.

Those interested in broader healthcare leadership should consider the best mha programs available online. These Master of Health Administration programs focus on developing the strategic and operational skills needed for high-level roles in healthcare organizations. With flexible learning options, these programs support both recent graduates and working professionals.

Best Scientists Citing Thomas Meinertz

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles