World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Mathematics

D-Index
31
Citations
4993
World Ranking
3308
National Ranking
215

Thomas J. Bridges publication distribution in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mathematics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas J. Bridges sits on this spectrum.

42–46 publications: 3 scientists 47–51 publications: 5 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 20 scientists 62–66 publications: 14 scientists 67–71 publications: 25 scientists 72–76 publications: 19 scientists 77–81 publications: 35 scientists 82–86 publications: 50 scientists 87–91 publications: 60 scientists 92–96 publications: 86 scientists 97–101 publications: 84 scientists 102–106 publications: 83 scientists 107–111 publications: 90 scientists 112–116 publications: 99 scientists 117–121 publications: 90 scientists 122–126 publications: 91 scientists 127–131 publications: 109 scientists 132–136 publications: 110 scientists 137–141 publications: 98 scientists 142–146 publications: 112 scientists 147–151 publications: 102 scientists 152–156 publications: 88 scientists 157–161 publications: 106 scientists 162–166 publications: 83 scientists 167–171 publications: 102 scientists 172–176 publications: 77 scientists 177–181 publications: 81 scientists 182–186 publications: 78 scientists 187–191 publications: 71 scientists 192–196 publications: 92 scientists 197–201 publications: 64 scientists 202–206 publications: 69 scientists 207–211 publications: 64 scientists 212–216 publications: 62 scientists 217–221 publications: 58 scientists 222–226 publications: 53 scientists 227–231 publications: 50 scientists 232–236 publications: 46 scientists 237–241 publications: 46 scientists 242–246 publications: 46 scientists 247–251 publications: 43 scientists 252–256 publications: 29 scientists 257–261 publications: 45 scientists 262–266 publications: 30 scientists 267–271 publications: 33 scientists 272–276 publications: 34 scientists 277–281 publications: 30 scientists 282–286 publications: 31 scientists 287–291 publications: 21 scientists 292–296 publications: 34 scientists 297–301 publications: 26 scientists 302–306 publications: 10 scientists 307–311 publications: 17 scientists 312–316 publications: 23 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 16 scientists 327–331 publications: 26 scientists 332–336 publications: 13 scientists 337–341 publications: 13 scientists 342–346 publications: 16 scientists 347–351 publications: 17 scientists 352–356 publications: 12 scientists 357–361 publications: 18 scientists 362–366 publications: 18 scientists 367–371 publications: 9 scientists 372–376 publications: 11 scientists 377–381 publications: 8 scientists 382–386 publications: 8 scientists 387–391 publications: 9 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 8 scientists 402–406 publications: 11 scientists 407–411 publications: 6 scientists 412–416 publications: 6 scientists 417–421 publications: 9 scientists 422–426 publications: 8 scientists 427–431 publications: 5 scientists 432–436 publications: 8 scientists 437–441 publications: 8 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 4 scientists 452–456 publications: 4 scientists 457–461 publications: 2 scientists 462–466 publications: 2 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 3 scientists 477–481 publications: 3 scientists 482–486 publications: 6 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 5 scientists 502–506 publications: 1 scientists 507–511 publications: 6 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 1 scientists 522–526 publications: 3 scientists 527–531 publications: 1 scientists 532–536 publications: 4 scientists 537+ publications: 100 scientists
42 publications 537+

This scientist: 159 publications — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 537 publications or more.

Thomas J. Bridges D-index placement in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mathematics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas J. Bridges sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 174 scientists 31 D-Index: 151 scientists 32 D-Index: 174 scientists 33 D-Index: 117 scientists 34 D-Index: 136 scientists 35 D-Index: 127 scientists 36 D-Index: 145 scientists 37 D-Index: 153 scientists 38 D-Index: 150 scientists 39 D-Index: 150 scientists 40 D-Index: 138 scientists 41 D-Index: 136 scientists 42 D-Index: 93 scientists 43 D-Index: 108 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 112 scientists 46 D-Index: 103 scientists 47 D-Index: 75 scientists 48 D-Index: 59 scientists 49 D-Index: 67 scientists 50 D-Index: 60 scientists 51 D-Index: 57 scientists 52 D-Index: 59 scientists 53 D-Index: 62 scientists 54 D-Index: 60 scientists 55 D-Index: 50 scientists 56 D-Index: 42 scientists 57 D-Index: 54 scientists 58 D-Index: 50 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 41 scientists 61 D-Index: 35 scientists 62 D-Index: 40 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 31 scientists 65 D-Index: 27 scientists 66 D-Index: 29 scientists 67 D-Index: 19 scientists 68 D-Index: 25 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 18 scientists 71 D-Index: 12 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 13 scientists 74 D-Index: 18 scientists 75 D-Index: 9 scientists 76 D-Index: 11 scientists 77 D-Index: 10 scientists 78 D-Index: 9 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 10 scientists 82 D-Index: 5 scientists 83 D-Index: 5 scientists 84 D-Index: 13 scientists 85 D-Index: 6 scientists 86+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 86+

This scientist: 31 D-Index — 9th percentile

9% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 86 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Multi-symplectic integrators: numerical schemes for Hamiltonian PDEs that conserve symplecticity

    Thomas J. Bridges;Sebastian Reich

  • Multi-symplectic structures and wave propagation

    Thomas J. Bridges

  • Differential eigenvalue problems in which the parameter appears nonlinearly

    T. J. Bridges;Philip John Morris

  • Numerical methods for Hamiltonian PDEs

    Thomas J Bridges;Sebastian Reich

  • Stability and instability of solitary waves of the fifth-order KdV equation: a numerical framework

    Thomas J. Bridges;Gianne Derks;Georg Gottwald

  • Multi-symplectic spectral discretizations for the Zakharov–Kuznetsov and shallow water equations

    Thomas J. Bridges;Sebastian Reich

  • Numerical exterior algebra and the compound matrix method

    Leanne Allen;Thomas J. Bridges

  • A GEOMETRIC FORMULATION OF THE CONSERVATION OF WAVE ACTION AND ITS IMPLICATIONS FOR SIGNATURE AND THE CLASSIFICATION OF INSTABILITIES

    Thomas J. Bridges

  • Reappraisal of the Kelvin Helmholtz problem. Part 1. Hamiltonian structure

    T. Brooke Benjamin;Thomas J. Bridges

  • A proof of the Benjamin-Feir instability

    Thomas J. Bridges;Alexander Mielke

  • Linear pulse structure and signalling in a film flow on an inclined plane

    Leonid Brevdo;Patrice Laure;Frederic Dias;Thomas J. Bridges

  • Linear Instability of Solitary Wave Solutions of the Kawahara Equation and Its Generalizations

    Thomas J. Bridges;Gianne Derks

  • CO2 Waveguide Lasers

    Unknown

  • The numerical computation of freely propagating time-dependent irrotational water waves

    Frédéric Dias;Thomas J. Bridges

  • Unstable eigenvalues and the linearization about solitary waves and fronts with symmetry

    Thomas J. Bridges;Gianne Derks

  • Computing Lyapunov exponents on a Stiefel manifold

    Thomas J. Bridges;Sebastian Reich

  • Instability of the Hocking-Stewartson pulse and its implications for three-dimensional Poiseuille flow

    Andrei L Afendikov;Thomas J Bridges

  • Reappraisal of the Kelvin–Helmholtz problem. Part 2. Interaction of the Kelvin–Helmholtz, superharmonic and Benjamin–Feir instabilities

    T. Brooke Benjamin;Thomas J. Bridges

  • Computing the Maslov index of solitary waves, Part 1: Hamiltonian systems on a four-dimensional phase space

    Frédéric Chardard;Frédéric Dias;Thomas J. Bridges

  • The symplectic Evans matrix and the instability of solitary waves and fronts

    Thomas J. Bridges;Gianne Derks

Frequent Co-Authors

Frédéric Dias
Frédéric Dias University College Dublin
Sebastian Reich
Sebastian Reich University of Potsdam
Goong Chen
Goong Chen Texas A&M University
Philip J. Morris
Philip J. Morris Pennsylvania State University
Sergey Zelik
Sergey Zelik University of Surrey
Alexander Mielke
Alexander Mielke Weierstrass Institute for Applied Analysis and Stochastics
Guido Schneider
Guido Schneider University of Stuttgart
Christopher K. R. T. Jones
Christopher K. R. T. Jones University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Peter Ashwin
Peter Ashwin University of Exeter
Richard Cushman
Richard Cushman University of Calgary

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For mathematics graduates aiming to broaden their career prospects, several online degrees complement their strong analytical background. An online masters in finance is a popular choice, offering knowledge in financial modeling and risk management. This degree enhances opportunities in banking, investment, and corporate finance roles.

Business-oriented professionals often seek accelerated learning options like the shortest online mba programs. These allow students to gain essential managerial skills quickly, facilitating faster career advancement without significant time away from work.

Marketing is another promising pathway, especially with affordable options such as the cheapest online marketing degree, which provides expertise in digital strategy, analytics, and consumer behavior. This aligns well with the quantitative skills developed in mathematics.

For a comprehensive business education in a condensed format, exploring one year mba programs is beneficial. These programs are designed to equip students with leadership and strategic thinking skills swiftly, helping graduates transition smoothly into high-impact roles.

Best Scientists Citing Thomas J. Bridges

Recently Published Articles