World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
40
Citations
6241
World Ranking
8101
National Ranking
3475

Tamara King publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tamara King sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 76 publications — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Tamara King D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tamara King sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Tamara King is affiliated with the University of New England in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Medicine, Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, and Neuroscience. Within these disciplines, they have focused on subfields including Physiology, Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Rheumatology, and Cancer Research.

The scientist's work centers on key topics such as Pain Mechanisms and Treatments, Osteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms, Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology, MicroRNA in disease regulation, Bone Metabolism and Diseases, Bone and Joint Diseases, and Adipose Tissue and Metabolism.

Among Tamara King's recent papers are:

  • A peptidomimetic modulator of the Ca V 2.2 N-type calcium channel for chronic pain (2023), published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Results of the patient report of intermittent catheterization experience (PRICE) study (2021), published in Neurourology and Urodynamics
  • Voluntary exercise blocks ongoing pain and diminishes bone remodeling while sparing protective mechanical pain in a rat model of advanced osteoarthritis pain (2021), published in Pain
  • Effects of Vancomycin on Persistent Pain-Stimulated and Pain-Depressed Behaviors in Female Fischer Rats With or Without Voluntary Access to Running Wheels (2021), published in Journal of Pain
  • Sustained Morphine Delivery Suppresses Bone Formation and Alters Metabolic and Circulating miRNA Profiles in Male C57BL/6J Mice (2020), published in Journal of Bone and Mineral Research

Tamara King has frequently published in the following venues:

  • Journal of Pain (5 publications)
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (1 publication)
  • Neurourology and Urodynamics (1 publication)
  • Pain (1 publication)
  • Journal of Bone and Mineral Research (1 publication)

The scientist has collaborated multiple times with several coauthors, including:

  • Denise Giuvelis (4 collaborations)
  • Glenn W. Stevenson (4 collaborations)
  • Ravin Davis (3 collaborations)
  • Francesca Asmus (3 collaborations)
  • Adriana Lelis Carvalho (3 collaborations)

Best Publications

  • Unmasking the tonic-aversive state in neuropathic pain.

    Tamara King;Louis Vera-Portocarrero;Tannia Gutierrez;Todd W Vanderah

  • Pain relief produces negative reinforcement through activation of mesolimbic reward–valuation circuitry

    Edita Navratilova;Jennifer Y. Xie;Alec Okun;Chaoling Qu

  • Underlying mechanisms of pronociceptive consequences of prolonged morphine exposure.

    Michael H. Ossipov;Josephine Lai;Tamara King;Todd W. Vanderah

  • Antinociceptive and nociceptive actions of opioids.

    Michael H. Ossipov;Josephine Lai;Tamara King;Todd W. Vanderah

  • Medullary pain facilitating neurons mediate allodynia in headache-related pain.

    Rebecca M. Edelmayer;Todd W. Vanderah;Lisa Majuta;En-Tan Zhang

  • Lesion of the rostral anterior cingulate cortex eliminates the aversiveness of spontaneous neuropathic pain following partial or complete axotomy

    Chaoling Qu;Tamara King;Alec Okun;Josephine Lai

  • Is paradoxical pain induced by sustained opioid exposure an underlying mechanism of opioid antinociceptive tolerance

    Tamara King;Michael H. Ossipov;Todd W. Vanderah;Frank Porreca

  • Engagement of descending inhibition from the rostral ventromedial medulla protects against chronic neuropathic pain

    Milena De Felice;Raul Sanoja;Ruizhong Wang;Louis Vera-Portocarrero

  • Role of NK-1 neurotransmission in opioid-induced hyperalgesia.

    Tamara King;Luis R. Gardell;Ruizhong Wang;Anna Vardanyan

  • Descending facilitation from the rostral ventromedial medulla maintains nerve injury-induced central sensitization

    L.P. Vera-Portocarrero;E.-T. Zhang;M.H. Ossipov;J.Y. Xie

  • Evaluation of reward from pain relief.

    Edita Navratilova;Jennifer Yanhua Xie;Tamara King;Frank Porreca

  • Pros and Cons of Clinically Relevant Methods to Assess Pain in Rodents.

    Anke Tappe-Theodor;Tamara King;Michael M. Morgan

  • Afferent drive elicits ongoing pain in a model of advanced osteoarthritis.

    Alec Okun;Ping Liu;Peg Davis;Jiyang Ren

  • Morphine treatment accelerates sarcoma-induced bone pain, bone loss, and spontaneous fracture in a murine model of bone cancer

    Tamara King;Anna Vardanyan;Lisa Majuta;Ohannes Melemedjian

  • Spinal NK-1 receptor expressing neurons mediate opioid-induced hyperalgesia and antinociceptive tolerance via activation of descending pathways

    Louis P. Vera-Portocarrero;En Tan Zhang;Tamara King;Michael H. Ossipov

  • Descending facilitation from the rostral ventromedial medulla maintains visceral pain in rats with experimental pancreatitis.

    Louis P. Vera–Portocarrero;Jennifer X. Yie;Justin Kowal;Michael H. Ossipov

  • Opioid receptor-mediated hyperalgesia and antinociceptive tolerance induced by sustained opiate delivery

    Luis R. Gardell;Tamara King;Michael H. Ossipov;Kenner C. Rice

  • TRPV1 receptor in expression of opioid-induced hyperalgesia.

    Anna Vardanyan;Ruizhong Wang;Todd W. Vanderah;Michael H. Ossipov

  • Ongoing pain in the MIA model of osteoarthritis

    Ping Liu;Alec Okun;Jiyang Ren;Rui Chen Guo

  • Transient inflammation-induced ongoing pain is driven by TRPV1 sensitive afferents

    Alec Okun;Milena DeFelice;Nathan Eyde;Jiyang Ren

  • Persistent restoration of sensory function by immediate or delayed systemic artemin after dorsal root injury.

    Ruizhong Wang;Tamara King;Michael H Ossipov;Anthony J Rossomando

  • Contribution of afferent pathways to nerve injury-induced spontaneous pain and evoked hypersensitivity

    Tamara King;Chaoling Qu;Alec Okun;Ramon Mercado

Frequent Co-Authors

Frank Porreca
Frank Porreca University of Arizona
Todd W. Vanderah
Todd W. Vanderah University of Arizona
Michael H. Ossipov
Michael H. Ossipov University of Arizona
Howard L. Fields
Howard L. Fields University of California, San Francisco
Gregory Dussor
Gregory Dussor The University of Texas at Dallas
Josephine Lai
Josephine Lai University of Arizona
Lucy Liaw
Lucy Liaw Maine Medical Center
Patrick W. Mantyh
Patrick W. Mantyh University of Arizona
T. Philip Malan
T. Philip Malan University of Arizona
Theodore J. Price
Theodore J. Price The University of Texas at Dallas

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a neuroscience career often means considering related fields and flexible education options. Today, many prospective students look for online programs in psychology, social work, and behavior analysis to expand their skill set or pivot to a new professional path.

For those interested in social work, the cheapest online msw degrees provide a cost-effective route into clinical and counseling roles, while accelerated msw program online options can help graduates enter the workforce faster.

If you’re considering behavior analysis, bcba online masters programs make it possible to gain credentials and specialize in behavioral science without relocating. Similarly, for those interested in core psychology, accelerated psychology programs enable students to complete their degree in less time—all through flexible online coursework.

Each of these pathways can complement a neuroscience background and open doors to diverse, in-demand careers in mental health, education, and research.

Best Scientists Citing Tamara King

Trending Scientists