World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Microbiology 46 4915 4530 1902 1705 72 7858

Suzanne E. Ohmit publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Suzanne E. Ohmit between 1987 and 2019, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Suzanne E. Ohmit published across 33 years, from 1987 to 2019, averaging 2.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 10 publications in 2016. 1 of the 77 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1987 to 2019. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 10. Peak 10 publications in 2016. 1987: 1 publication 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 1 publication 1993: 1 publication 1994: 0 publications 1995: 5 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 6 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 3 publications 2007: 1 publication 2008: 1 publication 2009: 3 publications 2010: 1 publication 2011: 3 publications 2012: 2 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 8 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 10 publications 2017: 2 publications 2018: 0 publications 2019: 1 publication
1987 2019

77 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Suzanne E. Ohmit: publications per year, 1987 to 2019
Year Publications
1987 1
1988 0
1989 0
1990 0
1991 0
1992 1
1993 1
1994 0
1995 5
1996 2
1997 0
1998 2
1999 2
2000 2
2001 3
2002 0
2003 6
2004 4
2005 1
2006 3
2007 1
2008 1
2009 3
2010 1
2011 3
2012 2
2013 5
2014 8
2015 7
2016 10
2017 2
2018 0
2019 1
Total 77
Download as CSV

Suzanne E. Ohmit publication distribution in Microbiology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Microbiology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Suzanne E. Ohmit sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 64 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 55–64 to 679+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 288. Most scientists, 288, have 135–144 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 679 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 65–74 publications, is where this scientist sits. 55–64 publications: 8 scientists 65–74 publications: 29 scientists 75–84 publications: 55 scientists 85–94 publications: 112 scientists 95–104 publications: 137 scientists 105–114 publications: 190 scientists 115–124 publications: 235 scientists 125–134 publications: 234 scientists 135–144 publications: 288 scientists 145–154 publications: 265 scientists 155–164 publications: 264 scientists 165–174 publications: 253 scientists 175–184 publications: 276 scientists 185–194 publications: 190 scientists 195–204 publications: 234 scientists 205–214 publications: 208 scientists 215–224 publications: 198 scientists 225–234 publications: 155 scientists 235–244 publications: 161 scientists 245–254 publications: 160 scientists 255–264 publications: 146 scientists 265–274 publications: 139 scientists 275–284 publications: 148 scientists 285–294 publications: 115 scientists 295–304 publications: 96 scientists 305–314 publications: 88 scientists 315–324 publications: 106 scientists 325–334 publications: 65 scientists 335–344 publications: 76 scientists 345–354 publications: 64 scientists 355–364 publications: 62 scientists 365–374 publications: 65 scientists 375–384 publications: 61 scientists 385–394 publications: 34 scientists 395–404 publications: 44 scientists 405–414 publications: 36 scientists 415–424 publications: 35 scientists 425–434 publications: 29 scientists 435–444 publications: 33 scientists 445–454 publications: 34 scientists 455–464 publications: 25 scientists 465–474 publications: 26 scientists 475–484 publications: 20 scientists 485–494 publications: 19 scientists 495–504 publications: 16 scientists 505–514 publications: 17 scientists 515–524 publications: 23 scientists 525–534 publications: 14 scientists 535–544 publications: 14 scientists 545–554 publications: 18 scientists 555–564 publications: 12 scientists 565–574 publications: 7 scientists 575–584 publications: 9 scientists 585–594 publications: 9 scientists 595–604 publications: 9 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 9 scientists 625–634 publications: 7 scientists 635–644 publications: 4 scientists 645–654 publications: 5 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 7 scientists 675–678 publications: 3 scientists 679+ publications: 99 scientists
55–64 publications 679+

This scientist: 72 publications — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 679 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Microbiology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 5,513 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
55–64 8
65–74 29 72
75–84 55
85–94 112
95–104 137
105–114 190
115–124 235
125–134 234
135–144 288
145–154 265
155–164 264
165–174 253
175–184 276
185–194 190
195–204 234
205–214 208
215–224 198
225–234 155
235–244 161
245–254 160
255–264 146
265–274 139
275–284 148
285–294 115
295–304 96
305–314 88
315–324 106
325–334 65
335–344 76
345–354 64
355–364 62
365–374 65
375–384 61
385–394 34
395–404 44
405–414 36
415–424 35
425–434 29
435–444 33
445–454 34
455–464 25
465–474 26
475–484 20
485–494 19
495–504 16
505–514 17
515–524 23
525–534 14
535–544 14
545–554 18
555–564 12
565–574 7
575–584 9
585–594 9
595–604 9
605–614 7
615–624 9
625–634 7
635–644 4
645–654 5
655–664 6
665–674 7
675–678 3
679+ 99
Download as CSV

Suzanne E. Ohmit D-index placement in Microbiology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Microbiology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Suzanne E. Ohmit sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 88 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40 to 127+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 162. Most scientists, 162, have 58 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 127 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 46 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40 D-Index: 30 scientists 41 D-Index: 86 scientists 42 D-Index: 90 scientists 43 D-Index: 117 scientists 44 D-Index: 122 scientists 45 D-Index: 123 scientists 46 D-Index: 108 scientists 47 D-Index: 110 scientists 48 D-Index: 106 scientists 49 D-Index: 109 scientists 50 D-Index: 129 scientists 51 D-Index: 111 scientists 52 D-Index: 116 scientists 53 D-Index: 127 scientists 54 D-Index: 134 scientists 55 D-Index: 134 scientists 56 D-Index: 112 scientists 57 D-Index: 136 scientists 58 D-Index: 162 scientists 59 D-Index: 151 scientists 60 D-Index: 139 scientists 61 D-Index: 123 scientists 62 D-Index: 126 scientists 63 D-Index: 144 scientists 64 D-Index: 109 scientists 65 D-Index: 103 scientists 66 D-Index: 124 scientists 67 D-Index: 112 scientists 68 D-Index: 103 scientists 69 D-Index: 131 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 93 scientists 72 D-Index: 96 scientists 73 D-Index: 92 scientists 74 D-Index: 80 scientists 75 D-Index: 66 scientists 76 D-Index: 87 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 73 scientists 79 D-Index: 59 scientists 80 D-Index: 57 scientists 81 D-Index: 55 scientists 82 D-Index: 47 scientists 83 D-Index: 77 scientists 84 D-Index: 50 scientists 85 D-Index: 45 scientists 86 D-Index: 42 scientists 87 D-Index: 41 scientists 88 D-Index: 32 scientists 89 D-Index: 38 scientists 90 D-Index: 35 scientists 91 D-Index: 34 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 26 scientists 94 D-Index: 33 scientists 95 D-Index: 22 scientists 96 D-Index: 37 scientists 97 D-Index: 22 scientists 98 D-Index: 21 scientists 99 D-Index: 22 scientists 100 D-Index: 30 scientists 101 D-Index: 16 scientists 102 D-Index: 20 scientists 103 D-Index: 17 scientists 104 D-Index: 19 scientists 105 D-Index: 16 scientists 106 D-Index: 19 scientists 107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108 D-Index: 14 scientists 109 D-Index: 10 scientists 110 D-Index: 9 scientists 111 D-Index: 7 scientists 112 D-Index: 11 scientists 113 D-Index: 6 scientists 114 D-Index: 15 scientists 115 D-Index: 10 scientists 116 D-Index: 12 scientists 117 D-Index: 7 scientists 118 D-Index: 10 scientists 119 D-Index: 10 scientists 120 D-Index: 11 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 7 scientists 123 D-Index: 12 scientists 124 D-Index: 5 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126 D-Index: 6 scientists 127+ D-Index: 95 scientists
40 D-Index 127+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 127 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Microbiology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 5,513 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40 30
41 86
42 90
43 117
44 122
45 123
46 108 46
47 110
48 106
49 109
50 129
51 111
52 116
53 127
54 134
55 134
56 112
57 136
58 162
59 151
60 139
61 123
62 126
63 144
64 109
65 103
66 124
67 112
68 103
69 131
70 94
71 93
72 96
73 92
74 80
75 66
76 87
77 60
78 73
79 59
80 57
81 55
82 47
83 77
84 50
85 45
86 42
87 41
88 32
89 38
90 35
91 34
92 27
93 26
94 33
95 22
96 37
97 22
98 21
99 22
100 30
101 16
102 20
103 17
104 19
105 16
106 19
107 18
108 14
109 10
110 9
111 7
112 11
113 6
114 15
115 10
116 12
117 7
118 10
119 10
120 11
121 2
122 7
123 12
124 5
125 9
126 6
127+ 95
Download as CSV

Overview

Suzanne E. Ohmit is affiliated with the University of Michigan-Ann Arbor in the United States. Their academic profile reflects involvement in scientific research centered around their affiliation, though specific details about research topics or areas of expertise are not provided.

There are no recent papers listed under their name, which limits the ability to outline particular research contributions or trends in their work. Similarly, information regarding frequent co-authors, publication venues, or book publications is not available for this researcher.

Data on the main fields of study, subfields, or primary research topics connected to Suzanne E. Ohmit is also not present. This lack of information restricts a detailed understanding of the scope or specialization of their scholarly activities.

Regarding recognition, there are no recorded awards or honors linked to this scientist. There is no indication that they are deceased, so all descriptions reflect a current professional status.

Best Publications

  • Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness in the 2011–2012 Season: Protection Against Each Circulating Virus and the Effect of Prior Vaccination on Estimates

    Suzanne E. Ohmit;Mark G. Thompson;Joshua G. Petrie;Swathi N. Thaker

  • Influenza viruses resistant to the antiviral drug oseltamivir: transmission studies in ferrets.

    M. Louise Herlocher;Rachel Truscon;Stephanie Elias;Hui-Ling Yen

  • Suppressive antibacterial therapy with 0.75% metronidazole vaginal gel to prevent recurrent bacterial vaginosis

    Jack D. Sobel;Daron Ferris;Jane Schwebke;Paul Nyirjesy

  • Antibody to Influenza Virus Neuraminidase: An Independent Correlate of Protection

    Arnold S. Monto;Joshua G. Petrie;Rachel T. Cross;Emileigh Johnson

  • Comparative Efficacy of Inactivated and Live Attenuated Influenza Vaccines

    Arnold S. Monto;Suzanne E. Ohmit;Joshua G. Petrie;Emileigh Johnson

  • Prevention of Antigenically Drifted Influenza by Inactivated and Live Attenuated Vaccines

    Suzanne E. Ohmit;John C. Victor;Judy R. Rotthoff;Esther R. Teich

  • Influenza Hemagglutination-Inhibition Antibody Titer as a Correlate of Vaccine-Induced Protection

    Suzanne E. Ohmit;Joshua G. Petrie;Rachel T. Cross;Emileigh Johnson

  • Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness in the United States During 2012–2013: Variable Protection by Age and Virus Type

    Huong Q. McLean;Mark G. Thompson;Maria E. Sundaram;Burney A. Kieke

  • Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness in Preventing Hospitalization for Pneumonia in the Elderly

    David A. Foster;AkkeNeel Talsma;Alice Furumoto-Dawson;Suzanne E. Ohmit

  • Effectiveness of Seasonal Influenza Vaccines in the United States During a Season With Circulation of All Three Vaccine Strains

    John J. Treanor;H. Keipp Talbot;Suzanne E. Ohmit;Laura A. Coleman

  • Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness in the Community and the Household

    Suzanne E. Ohmit;Joshua G. Petrie;Ryan E. Malosh;Benjamin J. Cowling

  • Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness Against 2009 Pandemic Influenza A(H1N1) Virus Differed by Vaccine Type During 2013–2014 in the United States

    Manjusha Gaglani;Jessica Pruszynski;Kempapura Murthy;Lydia Clipper

  • Longitudinal study of cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-seropositive and at-risk HIV-seronegative women.

    Paula Schuman;Suzanne E. Ohmit;Robert S. Klein;Ann Duerr

  • Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness among Elderly Nursing Home Residents: A Cohort Study

    Arnold S. Monto;Kenneth Hornbuckle;Suzanne E. Ohmit

  • Rhinovirus Infections in Tecumseh, Michigan: Frequency of Illness and Number of Serotypes

    Arnold S. Monto;Elza R. Bryan;Suzanne Ohmit

  • Effectiveness of non-adjuvanted pandemic influenza a vaccines for preventing pandemic influenza acute respiratory illness visits in 4 U.S. communities

    Marie R. Griffin;Arnold S. Monto;Edward A. Belongia;John J. Treanor

  • Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness in Preventing Hospitalization among the Elderly during Influenza Type A and Type B Seasons

    Suzanne E Ohmit;Arnold S Monto

  • Efficacy Studies of Influenza Vaccines: Effect of End Points Used and Characteristics of Vaccine Failures

    Joshua G. Petrie;Suzanne E. Ohmit;Emileigh Johnson;Rachel T. Cross

  • Symptomatic predictors of influenza virus positivity in children during the influenza season.

    Suzanne E. Ohmit;Arnold S. Monto

  • Detection and Control of Influenza Outbreaks in Well-Vaccinated Nursing Home Populations

    Arnold S. Monto;Judy Rotthoff;Esther Teich;M. Louise Herlocher

  • Prevention of symptomatic seasonal influenza in 2005-2006 by inactivated and live attenuated vaccines.

    Suzanne E. Ohmit;John C. Victor;John C. Victor;Esther R. Teich;Rachel K. Truscon

  • Early estimates of seasonal influenza vaccine effectiveness - United States, January 2013

    Lisa Jackson;Michael L. Jackson;C. Hallie Phillips;Joyce Benoit

Frequent Co-Authors

Arnold S. Monto
Arnold S. Monto University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Mark G. Thompson
Mark G. Thompson Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Alicia M. Fry
Alicia M. Fry Emory University
Edward A. Belongia
Edward A. Belongia Marshfield Clinic
Manjusha Gaglani
Manjusha Gaglani Baylor College of Medicine
Richard K. Zimmerman
Richard K. Zimmerman University of Pittsburgh
Mary Patricia Nowalk
Mary Patricia Nowalk University of Pittsburgh
Lisa A. Jackson
Lisa A. Jackson Kaiser Permanente
Brendan Flannery
Brendan Flannery Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Huong Q. McLean
Huong Q. McLean Marshfield Clinic

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees related to microbiology opens up diverse career opportunities, even for those facing unique challenges. For individuals wondering about options after conviction, the what is the best degree for a convicted felon guide offers insights on accessible fields that can lead to stable employment.

Health sciences play a significant role in microbiology-related careers. One interesting path is becoming a functional medicine nurse practitioner. This role combines clinical knowledge and patient care, and the article on how to become a functional medicine nurse practitioner provides a clear roadmap to enter this evolving specialty.

On the administrative side, careers like certified professional coder (CPC) offer excellent growth prospects. Understanding cpc salary and career paths can help microbiology graduates pivot towards health information management and medical coding.

Similarly, a bachelor of science in health information management salary reflects the value of data management skills in healthcare. These complementary fields enhance microbiology graduates' employability in hospitals, research centers, and biotech firms.

Best Scientists Citing Suzanne E. Ohmit

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles