World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Stephen A. Zeff

Stephen A. Zeff

D-Index & Metrics

Business and Management

D-Index
31
Citations
5858
World Ranking
2772
National Ranking
1080

Stephen A. Zeff publications per year

1962: 1 publications 1963: 0 publications 1964: 1 publications 1965: 0 publications 1966: 0 publications 1967: 1 publications 1968: 1 publications 1969: 3 publications 1970: 1 publications 1971: 6 publications 1972: 1 publications 1973: 2 publications 1974: 1 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 4 publications 1977: 1 publications 1978: 2 publications 1979: 1 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 2 publications 1983: 1 publications 1984: 2 publications 1985: 1 publications 1986: 1 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 1 publications 1989: 1 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 1 publications 1992: 2 publications 1993: 4 publications 1994: 2 publications 1995: 3 publications 1996: 4 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 4 publications 1999: 5 publications 2000: 13 publications 2001: 10 publications 2002: 8 publications 2003: 6 publications 2004: 0 publications 2005: 0 publications 2006: 1 publications 2007: 24 publications 2008: 13 publications 2009: 10 publications 2010: 21 publications 2011: 4 publications 2012: 12 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 10 publications 2015: 29 publications 2016: 14 publications 2017: 1 publications 2018: 11 publications 2019: 3 publications 2020: 13 publications 2021: 5 publications 2022: 6 publications 2023: 2 publications 2024: 3 publications 2025: 12 publications
1962 2025

300 publications in total across all disciplines

Stephen A. Zeff publication distribution in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Business and Management in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephen A. Zeff sits on this spectrum.

35–39 publications: 2 scientists 40–44 publications: 2 scientists 45–49 publications: 5 scientists 50–54 publications: 20 scientists 55–59 publications: 39 scientists 60–64 publications: 66 scientists 65–69 publications: 52 scientists 70–74 publications: 80 scientists 75–79 publications: 83 scientists 80–84 publications: 116 scientists 85–89 publications: 94 scientists 90–94 publications: 111 scientists 95–99 publications: 122 scientists 100–104 publications: 104 scientists 105–109 publications: 113 scientists 110–114 publications: 96 scientists 115–119 publications: 97 scientists 120–124 publications: 112 scientists 125–129 publications: 93 scientists 130–134 publications: 79 scientists 135–139 publications: 69 scientists 140–144 publications: 80 scientists 145–149 publications: 81 scientists 150–154 publications: 85 scientists 155–159 publications: 50 scientists 160–164 publications: 74 scientists 165–169 publications: 61 scientists 170–174 publications: 40 scientists 175–179 publications: 44 scientists 180–184 publications: 47 scientists 185–189 publications: 59 scientists 190–194 publications: 35 scientists 195–199 publications: 37 scientists 200–204 publications: 49 scientists 205–209 publications: 48 scientists 210–214 publications: 34 scientists 215–219 publications: 31 scientists 220–224 publications: 37 scientists 225–229 publications: 34 scientists 230–234 publications: 25 scientists 235–239 publications: 28 scientists 240–244 publications: 34 scientists 245–249 publications: 28 scientists 250–254 publications: 23 scientists 255–259 publications: 22 scientists 260–264 publications: 11 scientists 265–269 publications: 16 scientists 270–274 publications: 23 scientists 275–279 publications: 12 scientists 280–284 publications: 16 scientists 285–289 publications: 10 scientists 290–294 publications: 12 scientists 295–299 publications: 12 scientists 300–304 publications: 8 scientists 305–309 publications: 13 scientists 310–314 publications: 13 scientists 315–319 publications: 6 scientists 320–324 publications: 10 scientists 325–329 publications: 9 scientists 330–334 publications: 7 scientists 335–339 publications: 10 scientists 340–344 publications: 10 scientists 345–349 publications: 7 scientists 350–354 publications: 4 scientists 355–359 publications: 10 scientists 360–364 publications: 3 scientists 365–369 publications: 7 scientists 370–374 publications: 2 scientists 375–379 publications: 8 scientists 380–384 publications: 4 scientists 385–389 publications: 5 scientists 390–394 publications: 5 scientists 395–399 publications: 2 scientists 400–404 publications: 2 scientists 405–409 publications: 4 scientists 410–414 publications: 3 scientists 415–419 publications: 2 scientists 420–424 publications: 5 scientists 425–429 publications: 3 scientists 430–434 publications: 1 scientists 435 publications: 1 scientists 436+ publications: 100 scientists
35 publications 436+

This scientist: 233 publications — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more.

Stephen A. Zeff D-index placement in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Business and Management scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephen A. Zeff sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 156 scientists 31 D-Index: 159 scientists 32 D-Index: 171 scientists 33 D-Index: 161 scientists 34 D-Index: 135 scientists 35 D-Index: 124 scientists 36 D-Index: 114 scientists 37 D-Index: 111 scientists 38 D-Index: 103 scientists 39 D-Index: 89 scientists 40 D-Index: 81 scientists 41 D-Index: 97 scientists 42 D-Index: 80 scientists 43 D-Index: 69 scientists 44 D-Index: 68 scientists 45 D-Index: 63 scientists 46 D-Index: 54 scientists 47 D-Index: 69 scientists 48 D-Index: 50 scientists 49 D-Index: 58 scientists 50 D-Index: 54 scientists 51 D-Index: 62 scientists 52 D-Index: 54 scientists 53 D-Index: 43 scientists 54 D-Index: 49 scientists 55 D-Index: 35 scientists 56 D-Index: 40 scientists 57 D-Index: 44 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 29 scientists 60 D-Index: 48 scientists 61 D-Index: 32 scientists 62 D-Index: 30 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 22 scientists 65 D-Index: 19 scientists 66 D-Index: 20 scientists 67 D-Index: 18 scientists 68 D-Index: 17 scientists 69 D-Index: 21 scientists 70 D-Index: 20 scientists 71 D-Index: 19 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 10 scientists 74 D-Index: 16 scientists 75 D-Index: 24 scientists 76 D-Index: 13 scientists 77 D-Index: 19 scientists 78 D-Index: 8 scientists 79 D-Index: 6 scientists 80 D-Index: 4 scientists 81 D-Index: 12 scientists 82 D-Index: 7 scientists 83 D-Index: 7 scientists 84 D-Index: 6 scientists 85 D-Index: 10 scientists 86 D-Index: 4 scientists 87 D-Index: 11 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89+ D-Index: 96 scientists
30 D-Index 89+

This scientist: 31 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • How the U.S. Accounting Profession Got Where It Is Today: Part II

    Stephen A. Zeff

  • Financial Reporting and Global Capital Markets: A History of the International Accounting Standards Committee, 1973-2000

    Kees Camfferman;Stephen A. Zeff

  • Some obstacles to global financial reporting comparability and convergence at a high level of quality

    Stephen A. Zeff

  • “Political” Lobbying on Proposed Standards: A Challenge to the IASB

    Stephen A. Zeff

  • How the U.S. Accounting Profession Got Where It Is Today: Part I

    Unknown

  • Two Decades of the Journal of Accounting Research

    Thomas R. Dyckman;Stephen A. Zeff

  • The Rise of “Economic Consequences”

    Stephen A. Zeff

  • Forging Accounting Principles in Five Countries: A History and an Analysis of Trends

    Stephen A. Zeff

  • The Evolution of the IASC into the IASB, and the Challenges it Faces

    Stephen A. Zeff

  • THE EVOLUTION OF THE CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK FOR BUSINESS ENTERPRISES IN THE UNITED STATES

    Stephen A. Zeff

  • Financial Reporting and Global Capital Markets

    Unknown

  • The objectives of financial reporting: a historical survey and analysis

    Stephen A. Zeff

  • Commentary: Has Australia (or Any Other Jurisdiction) ‘Adopted’ IFRS?1

    Stephen A. Zeff;Christopher W. Nobes

  • Recent trends in accounting education and research in the USA: Some implications for UK academics☆

    Stephen A Zeff

  • The SEC rules historical cost accounting: 1934 to the 1970s

    Stephen A. Zeff

  • Aiming for Global Accounting Standards: The International Accounting Standards Board, 2001-2011

    Kees Camfferman;Stephen A. Zeff

  • Some Methodological Deficiencies in Empirical Research Articles in Accounting

    Thomas R. Dyckman;Stephen A. Zeff

  • Forging Accounting Principles in Five Countries

    Unknown

  • Accounting Research: Past, Present, and Future

    Thomas R. Dyckman;Thomas R. Dyckman;Stephen A. Zeff

  • The Challenge of Setting Standards for a Worldwide Constituency: Research Implications from the IASB’s Early History

    Kees Camfferman;Stephen A. Zeff

Frequent Co-Authors

Christopher Nobes
Christopher Nobes Royal Holloway University of London
William W. Cooper
William W. Cooper The University of Texas at Austin
Joel S. Demski
Joel S. Demski University of Florida
Dan S. Dhaliwal
Dan S. Dhaliwal University of Arizona

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Stephen A. Zeff

Recently Published Articles