World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Stefan Van Aelst

Stefan Van Aelst

D-Index & Metrics

Mathematics

D-Index
32
Citations
3810
World Ranking
3229
National Ranking
43

Stefan Van Aelst publication distribution in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mathematics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stefan Van Aelst sits on this spectrum.

42–46 publications: 3 scientists 47–51 publications: 5 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 20 scientists 62–66 publications: 14 scientists 67–71 publications: 25 scientists 72–76 publications: 19 scientists 77–81 publications: 35 scientists 82–86 publications: 50 scientists 87–91 publications: 60 scientists 92–96 publications: 86 scientists 97–101 publications: 84 scientists 102–106 publications: 83 scientists 107–111 publications: 90 scientists 112–116 publications: 99 scientists 117–121 publications: 90 scientists 122–126 publications: 91 scientists 127–131 publications: 109 scientists 132–136 publications: 110 scientists 137–141 publications: 98 scientists 142–146 publications: 112 scientists 147–151 publications: 102 scientists 152–156 publications: 88 scientists 157–161 publications: 106 scientists 162–166 publications: 82 scientists 167–171 publications: 102 scientists 172–176 publications: 77 scientists 177–181 publications: 81 scientists 182–186 publications: 78 scientists 187–191 publications: 71 scientists 192–196 publications: 92 scientists 197–201 publications: 64 scientists 202–206 publications: 69 scientists 207–211 publications: 64 scientists 212–216 publications: 62 scientists 217–221 publications: 58 scientists 222–226 publications: 53 scientists 227–231 publications: 50 scientists 232–236 publications: 46 scientists 237–241 publications: 46 scientists 242–246 publications: 46 scientists 247–251 publications: 43 scientists 252–256 publications: 29 scientists 257–261 publications: 45 scientists 262–266 publications: 30 scientists 267–271 publications: 33 scientists 272–276 publications: 34 scientists 277–281 publications: 30 scientists 282–286 publications: 31 scientists 287–291 publications: 21 scientists 292–296 publications: 34 scientists 297–301 publications: 26 scientists 302–306 publications: 10 scientists 307–311 publications: 17 scientists 312–316 publications: 23 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 16 scientists 327–331 publications: 26 scientists 332–336 publications: 13 scientists 337–341 publications: 13 scientists 342–346 publications: 16 scientists 347–351 publications: 17 scientists 352–356 publications: 12 scientists 357–361 publications: 18 scientists 362–366 publications: 18 scientists 367–371 publications: 9 scientists 372–376 publications: 11 scientists 377–381 publications: 8 scientists 382–386 publications: 8 scientists 387–391 publications: 9 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 8 scientists 402–406 publications: 11 scientists 407–411 publications: 6 scientists 412–416 publications: 6 scientists 417–421 publications: 9 scientists 422–426 publications: 8 scientists 427–431 publications: 5 scientists 432–436 publications: 8 scientists 437–441 publications: 8 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 4 scientists 452–456 publications: 4 scientists 457–461 publications: 2 scientists 462–466 publications: 2 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 3 scientists 477–481 publications: 3 scientists 482–486 publications: 6 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 5 scientists 502–506 publications: 1 scientists 507–511 publications: 6 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 1 scientists 522–526 publications: 3 scientists 527–531 publications: 1 scientists 532–536 publications: 4 scientists 537+ publications: 100 scientists
42 publications 537+

This scientist: 165 publications — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 537 publications or more.

Stefan Van Aelst D-index placement in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mathematics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stefan Van Aelst sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 174 scientists 31 D-Index: 151 scientists 32 D-Index: 174 scientists 33 D-Index: 117 scientists 34 D-Index: 136 scientists 35 D-Index: 127 scientists 36 D-Index: 145 scientists 37 D-Index: 153 scientists 38 D-Index: 150 scientists 39 D-Index: 150 scientists 40 D-Index: 137 scientists 41 D-Index: 136 scientists 42 D-Index: 93 scientists 43 D-Index: 108 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 112 scientists 46 D-Index: 103 scientists 47 D-Index: 75 scientists 48 D-Index: 59 scientists 49 D-Index: 67 scientists 50 D-Index: 60 scientists 51 D-Index: 57 scientists 52 D-Index: 59 scientists 53 D-Index: 62 scientists 54 D-Index: 60 scientists 55 D-Index: 50 scientists 56 D-Index: 42 scientists 57 D-Index: 54 scientists 58 D-Index: 50 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 41 scientists 61 D-Index: 35 scientists 62 D-Index: 40 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 31 scientists 65 D-Index: 27 scientists 66 D-Index: 29 scientists 67 D-Index: 19 scientists 68 D-Index: 25 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 18 scientists 71 D-Index: 12 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 13 scientists 74 D-Index: 18 scientists 75 D-Index: 9 scientists 76 D-Index: 11 scientists 77 D-Index: 10 scientists 78 D-Index: 9 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 10 scientists 82 D-Index: 5 scientists 83 D-Index: 5 scientists 84 D-Index: 13 scientists 85 D-Index: 6 scientists 86+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 86+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 86 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Robust estimation of Cronbach's alpha

    Unknown

  • Robust Linear Model Selection Based on Least Angle Regression

    Jafar A Khan;Stefan Van Aelst;Ruben H Zamar

  • Minimum volume ellipsoid

    Stefan Van Aelst;Peter Rousseeuw

  • Robust Multivariate Regression

    Peter J Rousseeuw;Stefan Van Aelst;Katrien Van Driessen;Jose A Gulló

  • Propagation of outliers in multivariate data

    Fatemah Alqallaf;Stefan Van Aelst;Victor J. Yohai;Ruben H. Zamar

  • Principal Components Analysis Based on Multivariate MM Estimators With Fast and Robust Bootstrap

    Matías Salibián-Barrera;Stefan Van Aelst;Gert Willems

  • Small sample corrections for LTS and MCD

    Unknown

  • The multivariate least-trimmed squares estimator

    Jose Agulló;Christophe Croux;Stefan Van Aelst

  • A Robust Hotelling Test

    G. Willems;G. Pison;P. J. Rousseeuw;S. Van Aelst

  • The median of a random fuzzy number. The 1-norm distance approach

    Beatriz Sinova;María Ángeles Gil;Ana Colubi;Stefan Van Aelst

  • Linear grouping using orthogonal regression

    Stefan Van Aelst;Xiaogang (Steven) Wang;Ruben H. Zamar;Rong Zhu

  • MULTIVARIATE REGRESSION S-ESTIMATORS FOR ROBUST ESTIMATION AND INFERENCE

    Stefan Van Aelst;Gert Willems

  • Tree-based prediction on incomplete data using imputation or surrogate decisions

    Unknown

  • Fast and robust bootstrap

    Matías Salibián-Barrera;Stefan Van Aelst;Gert Willems

  • Theory and applications of recent robust methods

    Mia Hubert;Greet Pison;Anja Struyf;Stefan van Aelst

  • Building a robust linear model with forward selection and stepwise procedures

    Jafar A. Khan;Stefan Van Aelst;Ruben H. Zamar

  • Fast and robust bootstrap for LTS

    Gert Willems;Stefan Van Aelst

  • The Deepest Regression Method

    Stefan Van Aelst;Peter J. Rousseeuw;Mia Hubert;Anja Struyf

  • Robustness of Deepest Regression

    Stefan Van Aelst;Peter J Rousseeuw

  • Lack of fluorophotometric evidence of aqueous-vitreous barrier disruption after posterior capsulorhexis.

    Veva De Groot;Mia Hubert;Jaap A Van Best;Sanne Engelen

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students of Mathematics considering complementary qualifications, pursuing an 1 year mba can provide essential business acumen and leadership skills in a condensed timeframe. This is ideal for those aiming to quickly transition into managerial roles where analytical expertise meets strategic decision-making.

It’s also important to explore flexibility in program structuring. Some candidates wonder, can you transfer credits into an mba program? The answer is yes, and this can significantly shorten completion time, especially for those with prior graduate-level coursework in related fields.

Mathematics graduates often find a natural path in data-centric careers, making a best masters in data analytics programs a strong option. These programs leverage mathematical foundations to interpret big data, driving business insights and innovation in various industries.

For those seeking accessible entry points into advanced business studies, identifying the easiest mba program can help. While entry criteria may vary, understanding these options ensures students make informed decisions aligning with their career goals and academic background.

Recently Published Articles