World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking National Ranking Publications Citations
Plant Science and Agronomy 52 1959 513 174 7143

Stanley J. Peloquin publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Stanley J. Peloquin between 1957 and 2010, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Stanley J. Peloquin published across 54 years, from 1957 to 2010, averaging 3.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 16 publications in 1991. 1 of the 175 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1957 to 2010. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 16. Peak 16 publications in 1991. 1957: 1 publication 1958: 3 publications 1959: 3 publications 1960: 3 publications 1961: 0 publications 1962: 0 publications 1963: 0 publications 1964: 7 publications 1965: 1 publication 1966: 4 publications 1967: 4 publications 1968: 7 publications 1969: 2 publications 1970: 2 publications 1971: 1 publication 1972: 1 publication 1973: 1 publication 1974: 3 publications 1975: 6 publications 1976: 6 publications 1977: 6 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 2 publications 1980: 6 publications 1981: 3 publications 1982: 6 publications 1983: 2 publications 1984: 2 publications 1985: 4 publications 1986: 4 publications 1987: 8 publications 1988: 1 publication 1989: 6 publications 1990: 7 publications 1991: 16 publications 1992: 1 publication 1993: 3 publications 1994: 2 publications 1995: 3 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 5 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 3 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 5 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 2 publications 2007: 1 publication 2008: 9 publications 2009: 0 publications 2010: 1 publication
1957 2010

175 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Stanley J. Peloquin: publications per year, 1957 to 2010
Year Publications
1957 1
1958 3
1959 3
1960 3
1961 0
1962 0
1963 0
1964 7
1965 1
1966 4
1967 4
1968 7
1969 2
1970 2
1971 1
1972 1
1973 1
1974 3
1975 6
1976 6
1977 6
1978 0
1979 2
1980 6
1981 3
1982 6
1983 2
1984 2
1985 4
1986 4
1987 8
1988 1
1989 6
1990 7
1991 16
1992 1
1993 3
1994 2
1995 3
1996 2
1997 3
1998 0
1999 5
2000 3
2001 1
2002 3
2003 2
2004 5
2005 1
2006 2
2007 1
2008 9
2009 0
2010 1
Total 175
Download as CSV

Stanley J. Peloquin publication distribution in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stanley J. Peloquin sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 88 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 36–40 to 467+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 255. Most scientists, 255, have 111–115 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 171–175 publications, is where this scientist sits. 36–40 publications: 2 scientists 41–45 publications: 7 scientists 46–50 publications: 40 scientists 51–55 publications: 58 scientists 56–60 publications: 60 scientists 61–65 publications: 107 scientists 66–70 publications: 130 scientists 71–75 publications: 153 scientists 76–80 publications: 191 scientists 81–85 publications: 199 scientists 86–90 publications: 206 scientists 91–95 publications: 218 scientists 96–100 publications: 226 scientists 101–105 publications: 227 scientists 106–110 publications: 247 scientists 111–115 publications: 255 scientists 116–120 publications: 253 scientists 121–125 publications: 233 scientists 126–130 publications: 219 scientists 131–135 publications: 201 scientists 136–140 publications: 194 scientists 141–145 publications: 176 scientists 146–150 publications: 157 scientists 151–155 publications: 147 scientists 156–160 publications: 151 scientists 161–165 publications: 159 scientists 166–170 publications: 137 scientists 171–175 publications: 128 scientists 176–180 publications: 126 scientists 181–185 publications: 98 scientists 186–190 publications: 114 scientists 191–195 publications: 100 scientists 196–200 publications: 90 scientists 201–205 publications: 71 scientists 206–210 publications: 98 scientists 211–215 publications: 70 scientists 216–220 publications: 86 scientists 221–225 publications: 61 scientists 226–230 publications: 58 scientists 231–235 publications: 53 scientists 236–240 publications: 64 scientists 241–245 publications: 39 scientists 246–250 publications: 46 scientists 251–255 publications: 51 scientists 256–260 publications: 36 scientists 261–265 publications: 44 scientists 266–270 publications: 35 scientists 271–275 publications: 30 scientists 276–280 publications: 33 scientists 281–285 publications: 35 scientists 286–290 publications: 36 scientists 291–295 publications: 26 scientists 296–300 publications: 26 scientists 301–305 publications: 31 scientists 306–310 publications: 30 scientists 311–315 publications: 21 scientists 316–320 publications: 29 scientists 321–325 publications: 14 scientists 326–330 publications: 15 scientists 331–335 publications: 15 scientists 336–340 publications: 17 scientists 341–345 publications: 15 scientists 346–350 publications: 12 scientists 351–355 publications: 17 scientists 356–360 publications: 18 scientists 361–365 publications: 12 scientists 366–370 publications: 11 scientists 371–375 publications: 6 scientists 376–380 publications: 6 scientists 381–385 publications: 11 scientists 386–390 publications: 9 scientists 391–395 publications: 10 scientists 396–400 publications: 8 scientists 401–405 publications: 4 scientists 406–410 publications: 9 scientists 411–415 publications: 11 scientists 416–420 publications: 4 scientists 421–425 publications: 7 scientists 426–430 publications: 4 scientists 431–435 publications: 3 scientists 436–440 publications: 5 scientists 441–445 publications: 8 scientists 446–450 publications: 6 scientists 451–455 publications: 7 scientists 456–460 publications: 5 scientists 461–465 publications: 6 scientists 466 publications: 2 scientists 467+ publications: 99 scientists
36–40 publications 467+

This scientist: 174 publications — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 6,494 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
36–40 2
41–45 7
46–50 40
51–55 58
56–60 60
61–65 107
66–70 130
71–75 153
76–80 191
81–85 199
86–90 206
91–95 218
96–100 226
101–105 227
106–110 247
111–115 255
116–120 253
121–125 233
126–130 219
131–135 201
136–140 194
141–145 176
146–150 157
151–155 147
156–160 151
161–165 159
166–170 137
171–175 128 174
176–180 126
181–185 98
186–190 114
191–195 100
196–200 90
201–205 71
206–210 98
211–215 70
216–220 86
221–225 61
226–230 58
231–235 53
236–240 64
241–245 39
246–250 46
251–255 51
256–260 36
261–265 44
266–270 35
271–275 30
276–280 33
281–285 35
286–290 36
291–295 26
296–300 26
301–305 31
306–310 30
311–315 21
316–320 29
321–325 14
326–330 15
331–335 15
336–340 17
341–345 15
346–350 12
351–355 17
356–360 18
361–365 12
366–370 11
371–375 6
376–380 6
381–385 11
386–390 9
391–395 10
396–400 8
401–405 4
406–410 9
411–415 11
416–420 4
421–425 7
426–430 4
431–435 3
436–440 5
441–445 8
446–450 6
451–455 7
456–460 5
461–465 6
466 2
467+ 99
Download as CSV

Stanley J. Peloquin D-index placement in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stanley J. Peloquin sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 80 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 109+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 288. Most scientists, 288, have 34 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 52 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 200 scientists 31 D-Index: 236 scientists 32 D-Index: 253 scientists 33 D-Index: 283 scientists 34 D-Index: 288 scientists 35 D-Index: 240 scientists 36 D-Index: 246 scientists 37 D-Index: 243 scientists 38 D-Index: 247 scientists 39 D-Index: 229 scientists 40 D-Index: 232 scientists 41 D-Index: 230 scientists 42 D-Index: 228 scientists 43 D-Index: 219 scientists 44 D-Index: 193 scientists 45 D-Index: 164 scientists 46 D-Index: 158 scientists 47 D-Index: 143 scientists 48 D-Index: 131 scientists 49 D-Index: 127 scientists 50 D-Index: 122 scientists 51 D-Index: 122 scientists 52 D-Index: 110 scientists 53 D-Index: 102 scientists 54 D-Index: 98 scientists 55 D-Index: 79 scientists 56 D-Index: 85 scientists 57 D-Index: 88 scientists 58 D-Index: 91 scientists 59 D-Index: 62 scientists 60 D-Index: 61 scientists 61 D-Index: 59 scientists 62 D-Index: 54 scientists 63 D-Index: 61 scientists 64 D-Index: 59 scientists 65 D-Index: 58 scientists 66 D-Index: 41 scientists 67 D-Index: 49 scientists 68 D-Index: 39 scientists 69 D-Index: 32 scientists 70 D-Index: 40 scientists 71 D-Index: 47 scientists 72 D-Index: 38 scientists 73 D-Index: 28 scientists 74 D-Index: 29 scientists 75 D-Index: 28 scientists 76 D-Index: 22 scientists 77 D-Index: 21 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 26 scientists 80 D-Index: 19 scientists 81 D-Index: 16 scientists 82 D-Index: 12 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 14 scientists 85 D-Index: 11 scientists 86 D-Index: 17 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 10 scientists 89 D-Index: 12 scientists 90 D-Index: 18 scientists 91 D-Index: 16 scientists 92 D-Index: 16 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 12 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 9 scientists 97 D-Index: 9 scientists 98 D-Index: 11 scientists 99 D-Index: 12 scientists 100 D-Index: 5 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 4 scientists 103 D-Index: 11 scientists 104 D-Index: 5 scientists 105 D-Index: 9 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 4 scientists 108 D-Index: 8 scientists 109+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 109+

This scientist: 52 D-Index — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 6,494 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 200
31 236
32 253
33 283
34 288
35 240
36 246
37 243
38 247
39 229
40 232
41 230
42 228
43 219
44 193
45 164
46 158
47 143
48 131
49 127
50 122
51 122
52 110 52
53 102
54 98
55 79
56 85
57 88
58 91
59 62
60 61
61 59
62 54
63 61
64 59
65 58
66 41
67 49
68 39
69 32
70 40
71 47
72 38
73 28
74 29
75 28
76 22
77 21
78 25
79 26
80 19
81 16
82 12
83 16
84 14
85 11
86 17
87 13
88 10
89 12
90 18
91 16
92 16
93 17
94 12
95 8
96 9
97 9
98 11
99 12
100 5
101 8
102 4
103 11
104 5
105 9
106 7
107 4
108 8
109+ 99
Download as CSV

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Botany
  • Gene
  • Genetics

His primary areas of study are Ploidy, Botany, Genetics, Meiosis and Hybrid. Stanley J. Peloquin has researched Ploidy in several fields, including Genetic variability, Genotype and Pollen. His Pollen research includes elements of Cell biology, Cultivar and Genetic data.

The Botany study which covers Genetic variation that intersects with Germplasm, Introgression and Gene pool. His Meiosis research incorporates elements of Microspore, Mutant, Chromatid and Solanaceae. His Hybrid research focuses on Inbreeding and how it relates to Diallel cross.

His most cited work include:

  • THREE MECHANISMS OF 2n POLLEN FORMATION IN DIPLOID POTATOES (205 citations)
  • The significance of 2N gametes in potato breeding. (176 citations)
  • The significance of 2N gametes in potato breeding. (176 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

Stanley J. Peloquin mostly deals with Botany, Ploidy, Hybrid, Pollen and Horticulture. His Botany study often links to related topics such as Genetic diversity. His Ploidy research entails a greater understanding of Genetics.

His research in Hybrid intersects with topics in Epistasis, Introgression and Solanaceae. The study incorporates disciplines such as Adaptation, Genetic variability, Sterility and Gene–environment interaction in addition to Pollen. The various areas that Stanley J. Peloquin examines in his Horticulture study include Wild species and Pollination.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Botany (59.70%)
  • Ploidy (55.97%)
  • Hybrid (41.04%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 1998-2010)?

  • Horticulture (32.84%)
  • Ploidy (55.97%)
  • Botany (59.70%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

Stanley J. Peloquin spends much of his time researching Horticulture, Ploidy, Botany, Solanaceae and Cultivar. His work on Blight and High yielding as part of general Horticulture research is often related to Multi trait, thus linking different fields of science. His Ploidy study is associated with Genetics.

His work on Dormancy and Pollen as part of general Botany research is frequently linked to Specific gravity and Genetic Materials, bridging the gap between disciplines. His Cultivar study which covers Solanum chacoense that intersects with Stamen. His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Germplasm and Gene.

Between 1998 and 2010, his most popular works were:

  • The role of 2n gametes and endosperm balance number in the origin and evolution of polyploids in the tuber-bearing Solanums. (94 citations)
  • Meiotic Mutants in Potato: Valuable Variants (82 citations)
  • Substitutes for genome differentiation in tuber-bearing Solanum: interspecific pollen-pistil incompatibility, nuclear-cytoplasmic male sterility, and endosperm. (56 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Gene
  • Botany
  • Genetics

His main research concerns Genetics, Ploidy, Polyploid, Gametogenesis and Loss of heterozygosity. His Mendelian inheritance, Mutant, Meiosis and Biological evolution study, which is part of a larger body of work in Genetics, is frequently linked to Animal species, bridging the gap between disciplines. His Ploidy research includes themes of Chromosome regions, Solanum, Solanum tuberosum, Botany and Chiasma.

The Solanum tuberosum study combines topics in areas such as Cultivar, Germplasm, Genetic diversity, Hybrid and Dormancy. His research is interdisciplinary, bridging the disciplines of Evolutionary biology and Botany. Many of his studies involve connections with topics such as Endosperm and Polyploid.

Best Publications

  • THREE MECHANISMS OF 2n POLLEN FORMATION IN DIPLOID POTATOES

    D. W. S. Mok;S. J. Peloquin

  • The significance of 2N gametes in potato breeding.

    A. O. Mendiburu;S. J. Peloquin;S. J. Peloquin

  • Potato breeding with haploids and 2n gametes

    S. J. Peloquin;Georgia L. Yerk;Joanna E. Werner;Elizabeth Darmo

  • The potential of potato haploids in breeding and genetic research

    R. W. Hougas;S. J. Peloquin

  • Breeding value of 2n pollen (diplandroids) in tetraploid x diploid crosses in potatoes

    D. W. S. Mok;S. J. Peloquin

  • The inheritance of three mechanisms of diplandroid (2n pollen) formation in diploid potatoes

    Unknown

  • 2n gametes in potato species and their function in sexual polyploidization

    A.P.M. den Nijs;S.J. Peloquin

  • The role of 2n gametes and endosperm balance number in the origin and evolution of polyploids in the tuber-bearing Solanums.

    Domenico Carputo;Luigi Frusciante;Stanley J Peloquin

  • Meiotic Mutants in Potato: Valuable Variants

    Stanley J. Peloquin;Leonardo S. Boiteux;Domenico Carputo

  • HAPLOIDS OF THE COMMON POTATO

    R. W. Hougas;S. J. Peloquin;R. W. Ross

  • Endosperm balance number manipulation for direct in vivo germplasm introgression to potato from a sexually isolated relative (Solanum commersonii Dun.)

    Domenico Carputo;Amalia Barone;Teodoro Cardi;Angela Sebastiano

  • Bilateral sexual polyploidization in potatoes

    A. O. Mendiburu;S. J. Peloquin

  • Distribution and significance of diplandroids among the diploid solanums

    A. A. Quinn;D. W. S. Mok;S. J. Peloquin

  • Origin and evolution of cultivated tetraploid potatoes via 2n gametes.

    M. Iwanaga;S. J. Peloquin

  • Substitutes for genome differentiation in tuber-bearing Solanum: interspecific pollen-pistil incompatibility, nuclear-cytoplasmic male sterility, and endosperm.

    E. L. Camadro;D. Carputo;S. J. Peloquin

  • Occurrence of 2n pollen and ps gene frequencies in cultivated groups and their related wild species in tuber-bearing Solanums

    K. Watanabe;S. J. Peloquin

  • POLLEN TUBE GROWTH AND INCOMPATIBILITY FOLLOWING INTRA‐ AND INTER‐SPECIFIC POLLINATIONS IN LILIUM LONGIFLORUM

    Peter D. Ascher;S. J. Peloquin

  • Occurrence and mechanisms of 2n egg formation in 2x potato

    Joanna E. Werner;Stanley J. Peloquin

  • Sexual polyploidization and depolyploidization: some terminology and definitions

    A. O. Mendiburu;S. J. Peloquin

  • EFFECT OF FLORAL AGING ON THE GROWTH OF COMPATIBLE AND INCOMPATIBLE POLLEN TUBES IN LILIUM LONGIFLORUM

    Unknown

  • Gene-centromere mapping by 4x-2x matings in potatoes.

    A. O. Mendiburu;S. J. Peloquin

  • Genetic variation among haploids of the common potato.

    S. J. Peloquin;R. W. Hougas

  • Potato variety identification by use of electrophoretic patterns of tuber proteins and enzymes

    Sharon Desborough;S. J. Peloquin

  • Inheritance of incompatibility in hybrids between Solanum tuberosum haploids and diploid species

    M S Cipar;S. J. Peloquin;R. W. Hougas

  • Variability in the expression of self-incompatibility in tuber-bearing diploid solanum species

    M. S. Cipar;S. J. Peloquin;R. W. Hougas

  • Cross-incompatibility between two sympatric polyploid Solanum species.

    E. L. Camadro;S. J. Peloquin

Frequent Co-Authors

Rodomiro Ortiz
Rodomiro Ortiz Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
Jiming Jiang
Jiming Jiang Michigan State University
Philipp W. Simon
Philipp W. Simon University of Wisconsin–Madison
Shelley Jansky
Shelley Jansky University of Wisconsin–Madison
Luigi Frusciante
Luigi Frusciante University of Naples Federico II
David M. Stelly
David M. Stelly Texas A&M University
Jiwan P. Palta
Jiwan P. Palta University of Wisconsin–Madison
Michael J. Ottman
Michael J. Ottman University of Arizona
Roger A. C. Jones
Roger A. C. Jones University of Western Australia

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Stanley J. Peloquin

Recently Published Articles