World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Political Science 20 1975 1825 982 882 46 2947

Shannon C. McGregor publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Shannon C. McGregor between 2015 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Shannon C. McGregor published across 11 years, from 2015 to 2025, averaging 4.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 9 publications in 2025. 15 of the 53 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2015 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 9. Peak 9 publications in 2025. 2015: 5 publications 2016: 4 publications 2017: 5 publications 2018: 5 publications 2019: 5 publications 2020: 4 publications 2021: 5 publications 2022: 0 publications 2023: 5 publications 2024: 6 publications 2025: 9 publications
2015 2025

53 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Shannon C. McGregor: publications per year, 2015 to 2025
Year Publications
2015 5
2016 4
2017 5
2018 5
2019 5
2020 4
2021 5
2022 0
2023 5
2024 6
2025 9
Total 53
Download as CSV

Shannon C. McGregor publication distribution in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Political Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Shannon C. McGregor sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
20 40 60 80
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 36–40 to 333+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 97. Most scientists, 97, have 333+ publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 333 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 46–50 publications, is where this scientist sits. 36–40 publications: 10 scientists 41–45 publications: 11 scientists 46–50 publications: 25 scientists 51–55 publications: 27 scientists 56–60 publications: 44 scientists 61–65 publications: 52 scientists 66–70 publications: 62 scientists 71–75 publications: 62 scientists 76–80 publications: 79 scientists 81–85 publications: 71 scientists 86–90 publications: 82 scientists 91–95 publications: 65 scientists 96–100 publications: 85 scientists 101–105 publications: 76 scientists 106–110 publications: 66 scientists 111–115 publications: 78 scientists 116–120 publications: 67 scientists 121–125 publications: 73 scientists 126–130 publications: 73 scientists 131–135 publications: 64 scientists 136–140 publications: 45 scientists 141–145 publications: 53 scientists 146–150 publications: 44 scientists 151–155 publications: 45 scientists 156–160 publications: 33 scientists 161–165 publications: 32 scientists 166–170 publications: 28 scientists 171–175 publications: 31 scientists 176–180 publications: 29 scientists 181–185 publications: 27 scientists 186–190 publications: 36 scientists 191–195 publications: 27 scientists 196–200 publications: 24 scientists 201–205 publications: 16 scientists 206–210 publications: 16 scientists 211–215 publications: 19 scientists 216–220 publications: 16 scientists 221–225 publications: 17 scientists 226–230 publications: 18 scientists 231–235 publications: 23 scientists 236–240 publications: 17 scientists 241–245 publications: 13 scientists 246–250 publications: 17 scientists 251–255 publications: 9 scientists 256–260 publications: 13 scientists 261–265 publications: 8 scientists 266–270 publications: 12 scientists 271–275 publications: 8 scientists 276–280 publications: 10 scientists 281–285 publications: 13 scientists 286–290 publications: 13 scientists 291–295 publications: 5 scientists 296–300 publications: 6 scientists 301–305 publications: 11 scientists 306–310 publications: 9 scientists 311–315 publications: 6 scientists 316–320 publications: 4 scientists 321–325 publications: 4 scientists 326–330 publications: 2 scientists 331–332 publications: 5 scientists 333+ publications: 97 scientists
36–40 publications 333+

This scientist: 46 publications — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 333 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Political Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 2,033 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
36–40 10
41–45 11
46–50 25 46
51–55 27
56–60 44
61–65 52
66–70 62
71–75 62
76–80 79
81–85 71
86–90 82
91–95 65
96–100 85
101–105 76
106–110 66
111–115 78
116–120 67
121–125 73
126–130 73
131–135 64
136–140 45
141–145 53
146–150 44
151–155 45
156–160 33
161–165 32
166–170 28
171–175 31
176–180 29
181–185 27
186–190 36
191–195 27
196–200 24
201–205 16
206–210 16
211–215 19
216–220 16
221–225 17
226–230 18
231–235 23
236–240 17
241–245 13
246–250 17
251–255 9
256–260 13
261–265 8
266–270 12
271–275 8
276–280 10
281–285 13
286–290 13
291–295 5
296–300 6
301–305 11
306–310 9
311–315 6
316–320 4
321–325 4
326–330 2
331–332 5
333+ 97
Download as CSV

Shannon C. McGregor D-index placement in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Political Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Shannon C. McGregor sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100
Bar chart with 43 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 20 to 62+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 100. Most scientists, 100, have 62+ D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 62 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 20 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 20 D-Index: 76 scientists 21 D-Index: 79 scientists 22 D-Index: 84 scientists 23 D-Index: 68 scientists 24 D-Index: 88 scientists 25 D-Index: 82 scientists 26 D-Index: 76 scientists 27 D-Index: 75 scientists 28 D-Index: 99 scientists 29 D-Index: 96 scientists 30 D-Index: 96 scientists 31 D-Index: 81 scientists 32 D-Index: 86 scientists 33 D-Index: 81 scientists 34 D-Index: 84 scientists 35 D-Index: 72 scientists 36 D-Index: 58 scientists 37 D-Index: 53 scientists 38 D-Index: 48 scientists 39 D-Index: 40 scientists 40 D-Index: 40 scientists 41 D-Index: 32 scientists 42 D-Index: 26 scientists 43 D-Index: 25 scientists 44 D-Index: 33 scientists 45 D-Index: 33 scientists 46 D-Index: 17 scientists 47 D-Index: 21 scientists 48 D-Index: 22 scientists 49 D-Index: 18 scientists 50 D-Index: 19 scientists 51 D-Index: 19 scientists 52 D-Index: 15 scientists 53 D-Index: 14 scientists 54 D-Index: 10 scientists 55 D-Index: 13 scientists 56 D-Index: 9 scientists 57 D-Index: 11 scientists 58 D-Index: 12 scientists 59 D-Index: 10 scientists 60 D-Index: 5 scientists 61 D-Index: 7 scientists 62+ D-Index: 100 scientists
20 D-Index 62+

This scientist: 20 D-Index — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 62 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Political Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 2,033 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
20 76 20
21 79
22 84
23 68
24 88
25 82
26 76
27 75
28 99
29 96
30 96
31 81
32 86
33 81
34 84
35 72
36 58
37 53
38 48
39 40
40 40
41 32
42 26
43 25
44 33
45 33
46 17
47 21
48 22
49 18
50 19
51 19
52 15
53 14
54 10
55 13
56 9
57 11
58 12
59 10
60 5
61 7
62+ 100
Download as CSV

Best Publications

  • Social media as public opinion: How journalists use social media to represent public opinion:

    Shannon C McGregor

  • What Is Second Screening? Exploring Motivations of Second Screen Use and Its Effect on Online Political Participation

    Homero Gil de Zúñiga;Homero Gil de Zúñiga;Victor Garcia-Perdomo;Victor Garcia-Perdomo;Shannon C. McGregor

  • In Their Own Words: Political Practitioner Accounts of Candidates, Audiences, Affordances, Genres, and Timing in Strategic Social Media Use

    Daniel Kreiss;Regina G. Lawrence;Shannon C. McGregor

  • Technology Firms Shape Political Communication: The Work of Microsoft, Facebook, Twitter, and Google With Campaigns During the 2016 U.S. Presidential Cycle

    Daniel Kreiss;Shannon C. Mcgregor

  • Personalization, gender, and social media: gubernatorial candidates’ social media strategies

    Shannon C. McGregor;Regina G. Lawrence;Arielle Cardona

  • Personalization, social media, and voting: Effects of candidate self-personalization on vote intention:

    Shannon C McGregor

  • Twitter’s influence on news judgment: An experiment among journalists:

    Shannon C McGregor;Logan Molyneux

  • The “Arbiters of What Our Voters See”: Facebook and Google’s Struggle with Policy, Process, and Enforcement around Political Advertising

    Daniel Kreiss;Shannon C. Mcgregor

  • A review and provocation: On polarization and platforms

    Unknown

  • Twitter as a tool for and object of political and electoral activity: Considering electoral context and variance among actors

    Shannon C. McGregor;Rachel R. Mourão;Logan Molyneux

  • Talking Politics on Twitter: Gender, Elections, and Social Networks

    Shannon C. McGregor;Rachel R. Mourão

  • Social media as a public space for politics: Cross-national comparison of news consumption and participatory behaviors in the United States and the United Kingdom

    Magdalena Saldaña;Shannon C. McGregor;Homero Gil de Zúñiga

  • (Re)Claiming Our Expertise: Parsing Large Text Corpora With Manually Validated and Organic Dictionaries

    Ashley Muddiman;Shannon C. McGregor;Natalie Jomini Stroud

  • “Taking the Temperature of the Room”How Political Campaigns Use Social Media to Understand and Represent Public Opinion

    Shannon C McGregor;Shannon C McGregor

  • Political Identity Ownership: Symbolic Contests to Represent Members of the Public:

    Daniel Kreiss;Regina G Lawrence;Shannon C McGregor

  • Legitimating a platform: evidence of journalists’ role in transferring authority to Twitter

    Logan Molyneux;Shannon C. McGregor

  • Academic Caregivers on Organizational and Community Resilience in Academia (Fuck Individual Resilience)

    Sun Joo Grace Ahn;Emily T. Cripe;Brooke Foucault Welles;Shannon C. McGregor

  • Second Screening Donald Trump: Conditional Indirect Effects on Political Participation

    Shannon C. McGregor;Rachel R. Mourão

  • You Break It, You Buy It: The Naiveté of Social Engineering in Tech – And How to Fix It

    Rebekah Tromble;Shannon C. McGregor

  • Second Screening as Convergence in Brazil and the United States

    Shannon McGregor;Rachel Mourão;Ivo Emanuel Campos Machado Neto;Joseph Straubhaar

Frequent Co-Authors

Daniel Kreiss
Daniel Kreiss University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Regina G. Lawrence
Regina G. Lawrence University of Oregon
Homero Gil de Zúñiga
Homero Gil de Zúñiga University of Salamanca
Natalie Jomini Stroud
Natalie Jomini Stroud The University of Texas at Austin
Miriam J. Metzger
Miriam J. Metzger University of California, Santa Barbara
Ralph Hertwig
Ralph Hertwig Max Planck Institute for Human Development
Ullrich K. H. Ecker
Ullrich K. H. Ecker University of Western Australia
Gordon Pennycook
Gordon Pennycook Cornell University
Stephan Lewandowsky
Stephan Lewandowsky University of Bristol
David G. Rand
David G. Rand Cornell University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Shannon C. McGregor

Recently Published Articles