World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering

D-Index
33
Citations
3989
World Ranking
3045
National Ranking
1042

Sergey F. Gimelshein publication distribution in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sergey F. Gimelshein sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 10 scientists 57–66 publications: 23 scientists 67–76 publications: 32 scientists 77–86 publications: 62 scientists 87–96 publications: 67 scientists 97–106 publications: 91 scientists 107–116 publications: 113 scientists 117–126 publications: 115 scientists 127–136 publications: 130 scientists 137–146 publications: 140 scientists 147–156 publications: 155 scientists 157–166 publications: 132 scientists 167–176 publications: 133 scientists 177–186 publications: 130 scientists 187–196 publications: 140 scientists 197–206 publications: 115 scientists 207–216 publications: 125 scientists 217–226 publications: 117 scientists 227–236 publications: 99 scientists 237–246 publications: 92 scientists 247–256 publications: 100 scientists 257–266 publications: 95 scientists 267–276 publications: 88 scientists 277–286 publications: 77 scientists 287–296 publications: 74 scientists 297–306 publications: 74 scientists 307–316 publications: 62 scientists 317–326 publications: 70 scientists 327–336 publications: 59 scientists 337–346 publications: 58 scientists 347–356 publications: 45 scientists 357–366 publications: 44 scientists 367–376 publications: 36 scientists 377–386 publications: 41 scientists 387–396 publications: 32 scientists 397–406 publications: 23 scientists 407–416 publications: 28 scientists 417–426 publications: 27 scientists 427–436 publications: 25 scientists 437–446 publications: 23 scientists 447–456 publications: 23 scientists 457–466 publications: 20 scientists 467–476 publications: 12 scientists 477–486 publications: 24 scientists 487–496 publications: 18 scientists 497–506 publications: 12 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 21 scientists 527–536 publications: 12 scientists 537–546 publications: 8 scientists 547–556 publications: 16 scientists 557–566 publications: 3 scientists 567–576 publications: 11 scientists 577–586 publications: 6 scientists 587–596 publications: 5 scientists 597–606 publications: 6 scientists 607–616 publications: 7 scientists 617–626 publications: 7 scientists 627–636 publications: 10 scientists 637–646 publications: 4 scientists 647–656 publications: 3 scientists 657–658 publications: 2 scientists 659+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 659+

This scientist: 220 publications — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more.

Sergey F. Gimelshein D-index placement in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sergey F. Gimelshein sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 83 scientists 31 D-Index: 113 scientists 32 D-Index: 144 scientists 33 D-Index: 153 scientists 34 D-Index: 189 scientists 35 D-Index: 158 scientists 36 D-Index: 139 scientists 37 D-Index: 127 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 126 scientists 40 D-Index: 104 scientists 41 D-Index: 100 scientists 42 D-Index: 107 scientists 43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44 D-Index: 103 scientists 45 D-Index: 79 scientists 46 D-Index: 88 scientists 47 D-Index: 70 scientists 48 D-Index: 83 scientists 49 D-Index: 44 scientists 50 D-Index: 64 scientists 51 D-Index: 56 scientists 52 D-Index: 50 scientists 53 D-Index: 48 scientists 54 D-Index: 58 scientists 55 D-Index: 52 scientists 56 D-Index: 48 scientists 57 D-Index: 42 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 37 scientists 61 D-Index: 42 scientists 62 D-Index: 44 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 33 scientists 65 D-Index: 29 scientists 66 D-Index: 23 scientists 67 D-Index: 29 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 19 scientists 70 D-Index: 34 scientists 71 D-Index: 26 scientists 72 D-Index: 19 scientists 73 D-Index: 18 scientists 74 D-Index: 19 scientists 75 D-Index: 14 scientists 76 D-Index: 19 scientists 77 D-Index: 8 scientists 78 D-Index: 18 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 17 scientists 82 D-Index: 11 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 7 scientists 85 D-Index: 9 scientists 86 D-Index: 8 scientists 87 D-Index: 6 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 10 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 4 scientists 93+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 93+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Statistical simulation of reactive rarefied flows - Numerical approach and applications

    M. Ivanov;G. Markelov;S. Gimelshein

  • COMPUTATIONAL HYPERSONIC RAREFIED FLOWS

    M. S. Ivanov;S. F. Gimelshein

  • Hysteresis effect in stationary reflection of shock waves

    M. S. Ivanov;S. F. Gimelshein;A. E. Beylich

  • Numerical Modeling of Axisymmetric and Three-Dimensional Flows in Microelectromechanical Systems Nozzles

    Alina A. Alexeenko;Deborah A. Levin;Sergey F. Gimelshein;Robert J. Collins

  • Radiometric phenomena: From the 19th to the 21st century

    Andrew Ketsdever;Natalia Gimelshein;Sergey Gimelshein;Nathaniel Selden

  • Vibrational relaxation rates in the direct simulation Monte Carlo method

    N. E. Gimelshein;S. F. Gimelshein;D. A. Levin

  • Transient heat transfer and gas flow in a MEMS-based thruster

    A.A. Alexeenko;D.A. Fedosov;S.F. Gimelshein;D.A. Levin

  • Kinetic modeling of temperature driven flows in short microchannels

    Alina A. Alexeenko;Sergey F. Gimelshein;E. Phillip Muntz;Andrew D. Ketsdever

  • Simulation of gas dynamics and radiation in volcanic plumes on Io

    J. Zhang;David B Goldstein;Philip L Varghese;N. E. Gimelshein

  • Experimental and Numerical Determination of Micropropulsion Device Efficiencies at Low Reynolds Numbers

    Andrew D. Ketsdever;Michael T. Clabough;Sergey F. Gimelshein;Alina A. Alexeenko

  • Comparison of molecular tagging velocimetry data and direct simulation Monte Carlo simulations in supersonic micro jet flows

    W. R. Lempert;M. Boehm;N. Jiang;S. Gimelshein

  • Numerical analysis of shock wave reflection transition in steady flows

    M. S. Ivanov;G. N. Markelov;A. N. Kudryavtsev;S. F. Gimelshein

  • Numerical Simulation of High-Temperature Gas Flows in a Millimeter-Scale Thruster

    A. A. Alexeenko;D. A. Levin;S. F. Gimelshein;R. J. Collins

  • Numerical modeling of axisymmetric and three-dimensional flows in MEMS nozzles

    A. A. Alexeenko;S. F. Gimelshein;D. A. Levin;R. J. Collins

  • Performance analysis of microthrusters based on coupled thermal-fluid modeling and simulation

    A. A. Alexeenko;D. A. Levin;D. A. Fedosov;S. F. Gimelshein

  • Measurements and computations of mass flow and momentum flux through short tubes in rarefied gases

    T. C. Lilly;S. F. Gimelshein;A. D. Ketsdever;G. N. Markelov

  • Statistical Simulation of the Transition between Regular and Mach Reflection in Steady Flows

    M.S. Ivanov;S.F. Gimelshein;G.N. Markelov

  • High-Altitude Capsule Aerodynamics with Real Gas Effects

    M. S. Ivanov;G. N. Markelov;S. F. Gimelshein;L. V. Mishina

  • Direct Simulation Monte Carlo Modeling of Homogeneous Condensation in Supersonic Plumes

    Jiaqiang Zhong;Michael I. Zeifman;Deborah A. Levin;Sergey F. Gimelshein

  • Comparison of direct simulation Monte Carlo chemistry and vibrational models applied to oxygen shock measurements

    Ingrid Wysong;Sergey Gimelshein;Yevgeniy Bondar;Mikhail Ivanov

Frequent Co-Authors

Deborah A. Levin
Deborah A. Levin University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Mikhail N. Shneider
Mikhail N. Shneider Princeton University
Naibo Jiang
Naibo Jiang The Ohio State University
David Goldstein
David Goldstein University of New South Wales
Udo Buck
Udo Buck Max Planck Society
Graham V. Candler
Graham V. Candler University of Minnesota
Mo Samimy
Mo Samimy The Ohio State University
Igor V. Adamovich
Igor V. Adamovich The Ohio State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

While Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering are popular fields with strong career prospects, students often explore related disciplines and alternative pathways. For those interested in understanding human behavior and decision-making, an fbi profiler career path highlights how specialized education can lead to unique roles combining psychology and law enforcement.

If you are drawn to helping others but prefer a non-engineering route, the wide variety of types of counseling degrees offer flexible options. Some programs focus on specific populations or therapeutic techniques, making it essential to choose the right fit for your goals.

For students looking for streamlined academic options, exploring what is the easiest counseling degree can provide insight into programs with less intensive prerequisites and faster completion times.

Additionally, accelerated programs such as the accelerated bcba program online offer a quicker path to advanced qualifications in applied behavior analysis, blending convenience with professional advancement.

Exploring these diverse online degrees and career pathways can help engineering students and professionals pivot or enhance their skill sets for a dynamic job market.

Best Scientists Citing Sergey F. Gimelshein

Recently Published Articles