World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering

D-Index
35
Citations
4623
World Ranking
2676
National Ranking
941

Deborah A. Levin publication distribution in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Deborah A. Levin sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 10 scientists 57–66 publications: 23 scientists 67–76 publications: 32 scientists 77–86 publications: 62 scientists 87–96 publications: 67 scientists 97–106 publications: 91 scientists 107–116 publications: 113 scientists 117–126 publications: 115 scientists 127–136 publications: 130 scientists 137–146 publications: 140 scientists 147–156 publications: 155 scientists 157–166 publications: 132 scientists 167–176 publications: 133 scientists 177–186 publications: 130 scientists 187–196 publications: 140 scientists 197–206 publications: 115 scientists 207–216 publications: 125 scientists 217–226 publications: 117 scientists 227–236 publications: 99 scientists 237–246 publications: 92 scientists 247–256 publications: 100 scientists 257–266 publications: 95 scientists 267–276 publications: 88 scientists 277–286 publications: 77 scientists 287–296 publications: 74 scientists 297–306 publications: 74 scientists 307–316 publications: 62 scientists 317–326 publications: 70 scientists 327–336 publications: 59 scientists 337–346 publications: 58 scientists 347–356 publications: 45 scientists 357–366 publications: 44 scientists 367–376 publications: 36 scientists 377–386 publications: 41 scientists 387–396 publications: 32 scientists 397–406 publications: 23 scientists 407–416 publications: 28 scientists 417–426 publications: 27 scientists 427–436 publications: 25 scientists 437–446 publications: 23 scientists 447–456 publications: 23 scientists 457–466 publications: 20 scientists 467–476 publications: 12 scientists 477–486 publications: 24 scientists 487–496 publications: 18 scientists 497–506 publications: 12 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 21 scientists 527–536 publications: 12 scientists 537–546 publications: 8 scientists 547–556 publications: 16 scientists 557–566 publications: 3 scientists 567–576 publications: 11 scientists 577–586 publications: 6 scientists 587–596 publications: 5 scientists 597–606 publications: 6 scientists 607–616 publications: 7 scientists 617–626 publications: 7 scientists 627–636 publications: 10 scientists 637–646 publications: 4 scientists 647–656 publications: 3 scientists 657–658 publications: 2 scientists 659+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 659+

This scientist: 440 publications — 90th percentile

90% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more.

Deborah A. Levin D-index placement in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Deborah A. Levin sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 83 scientists 31 D-Index: 113 scientists 32 D-Index: 144 scientists 33 D-Index: 153 scientists 34 D-Index: 189 scientists 35 D-Index: 158 scientists 36 D-Index: 139 scientists 37 D-Index: 127 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 126 scientists 40 D-Index: 104 scientists 41 D-Index: 100 scientists 42 D-Index: 107 scientists 43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44 D-Index: 103 scientists 45 D-Index: 79 scientists 46 D-Index: 88 scientists 47 D-Index: 70 scientists 48 D-Index: 83 scientists 49 D-Index: 44 scientists 50 D-Index: 64 scientists 51 D-Index: 56 scientists 52 D-Index: 50 scientists 53 D-Index: 48 scientists 54 D-Index: 58 scientists 55 D-Index: 52 scientists 56 D-Index: 48 scientists 57 D-Index: 42 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 37 scientists 61 D-Index: 42 scientists 62 D-Index: 44 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 33 scientists 65 D-Index: 29 scientists 66 D-Index: 23 scientists 67 D-Index: 29 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 19 scientists 70 D-Index: 34 scientists 71 D-Index: 26 scientists 72 D-Index: 19 scientists 73 D-Index: 18 scientists 74 D-Index: 19 scientists 75 D-Index: 14 scientists 76 D-Index: 19 scientists 77 D-Index: 8 scientists 78 D-Index: 18 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 17 scientists 82 D-Index: 11 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 7 scientists 85 D-Index: 9 scientists 86 D-Index: 8 scientists 87 D-Index: 6 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 10 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 4 scientists 93+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 93+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Numerical Modeling of Axisymmetric and Three-Dimensional Flows in Microelectromechanical Systems Nozzles

    Alina A. Alexeenko;Deborah A. Levin;Sergey F. Gimelshein;Robert J. Collins

  • Vibrational relaxation rates in the direct simulation Monte Carlo method

    N. E. Gimelshein;S. F. Gimelshein;D. A. Levin

  • Transient heat transfer and gas flow in a MEMS-based thruster

    A.A. Alexeenko;D.A. Fedosov;S.F. Gimelshein;D.A. Levin

  • Simulation of gas dynamics and radiation in volcanic plumes on Io

    J. Zhang;David B Goldstein;Philip L Varghese;N. E. Gimelshein

  • Assessment of predictive capabilities for aerodynamic heating in hypersonic flow

    Doyle Knight;Olivier Chazot;Joanna Austin;Mohammad Ali Badr

  • Comparison of molecular tagging velocimetry data and direct simulation Monte Carlo simulations in supersonic micro jet flows

    W. R. Lempert;M. Boehm;N. Jiang;S. Gimelshein

  • Dissociation modeling in low density hypersonic flows of air

    Iain D. Boyd;Graham V. Candler;Deborah A. Levin

  • Development of kinetic-based energy exchange models for noncontinuum, ionized hypersonic flows

    T. Ozawa;Jiaqiang Zhong;D. A. Levin

  • Investigation of unsteady, hypersonic, laminar separated flows over a double cone geometry using a kinetic approach

    Ozgur Tumuklu;Deborah A. Levin;Vassilis Theofilis

  • Measurements of ultraviolet radiation from a 5-km/s bow shock

    Peter W. Erdman;Edward C. Zipf;Patrick Espy;Carl L. Howlett

  • On the unsteadiness of shock–laminar boundary layer interactions of hypersonic flows over a double cone

    Ozgur Tumuklu;Vassilis Theofilis;Deborah A. Levin

  • Ablative thermal protection systems: Pyrolysis modeling by scale-bridging molecular dynamics

    Abhilash Harpale;Saurabh Sawant;Rakesh Kumar;Deborah Levin

  • Extension of the DSMC method to high pressure flows

    Evgeny V. Titov;Deborah A. Levin

  • Flight Measurements of Low-Velocity Bow Shock Ultraviolet Radiation

    Peter W. Erdman;Edward C. Zipf;Patrick Espy;Carl Howlett

  • Numerical Simulation of High-Temperature Gas Flows in a Millimeter-Scale Thruster

    A. A. Alexeenko;D. A. Levin;S. F. Gimelshein;R. J. Collins

  • Numerical modeling of axisymmetric and three-dimensional flows in MEMS nozzles

    A. A. Alexeenko;S. F. Gimelshein;D. A. Levin;R. J. Collins

  • Performance analysis of microthrusters based on coupled thermal-fluid modeling and simulation

    A. A. Alexeenko;D. A. Levin;D. A. Fedosov;S. F. Gimelshein

  • CHAOS: An octree-based PIC-DSMC code for modeling of electron kinetic properties in a plasma plume using MPI-CUDA parallelization

    Unknown

  • Examination of theory for bow shock ultraviolet rocket experiments. II

    Deborah A. Levin;Matthew Braunstein;Graham V. Candler;Robert J. Collins

  • Direct Simulation Monte Carlo Modeling of Homogeneous Condensation in Supersonic Plumes

    Jiaqiang Zhong;Michael I. Zeifman;Deborah A. Levin;Sergey F. Gimelshein

Frequent Co-Authors

Sergey F. Gimelshein
Sergey F. Gimelshein University of Southern California
Graham V. Candler
Graham V. Candler University of Minnesota
Michael F. Modest
Michael F. Modest University of California, Merced
David Goldstein
David Goldstein University of New South Wales
Iain D. Boyd
Iain D. Boyd University of Colorado Boulder
Adri C. T. van Duin
Adri C. T. van Duin Pennsylvania State University
Vassilios Theofilis
Vassilios Theofilis Technion – Israel Institute of Technology
Patrick J. Espy
Patrick J. Espy Norwegian University of Science and Technology
Barbara J. Garrison
Barbara J. Garrison Pennsylvania State University
Edward L. Dreizin
Edward L. Dreizin New Jersey Institute of Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Students exploring Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering may also consider related fields that enhance their technical and analytical skills. For those interested in interdisciplinary studies, accelerated speech pathology programs online offer a pathway to combine engineering principles with healthcare applications, focusing on communication disorders affected by mechanical devices or technologies.

Beyond engineering, careers in law enforcement, such as becoming a criminal profiler, require a strong educational foundation in behavioral analysis and forensic science. Understanding the education, salary, and job outlook for a criminal profiler can help engineering graduates diversify their career options into investigative and analytical roles.

For individuals drawn to helping professions, exploring different types of counseling degrees can provide valuable insights into human behavior and mental health. This knowledge is especially useful in leadership or team management roles within engineering projects that demand emotional intelligence and conflict resolution skills.

Additionally, some may prefer the flexibility of fastest and easiest counseling degree programs to quickly gain credentials that complement a technical background. These programs enable professionals to expand their expertise without lengthy time commitments, supporting career advancement or transition.

Best Scientists Citing Deborah A. Levin

Recently Published Articles