World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering

D-Index
33
Citations
4490
World Ranking
3017
National Ranking
1035

Paul M. Danehy publication distribution in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul M. Danehy sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 10 scientists 57–66 publications: 23 scientists 67–76 publications: 32 scientists 77–86 publications: 62 scientists 87–96 publications: 67 scientists 97–106 publications: 91 scientists 107–116 publications: 113 scientists 117–126 publications: 115 scientists 127–136 publications: 130 scientists 137–146 publications: 140 scientists 147–156 publications: 155 scientists 157–166 publications: 132 scientists 167–176 publications: 133 scientists 177–186 publications: 130 scientists 187–196 publications: 140 scientists 197–206 publications: 115 scientists 207–216 publications: 125 scientists 217–226 publications: 117 scientists 227–236 publications: 99 scientists 237–246 publications: 92 scientists 247–256 publications: 100 scientists 257–266 publications: 95 scientists 267–276 publications: 88 scientists 277–286 publications: 77 scientists 287–296 publications: 74 scientists 297–306 publications: 74 scientists 307–316 publications: 62 scientists 317–326 publications: 70 scientists 327–336 publications: 59 scientists 337–346 publications: 58 scientists 347–356 publications: 45 scientists 357–366 publications: 44 scientists 367–376 publications: 36 scientists 377–386 publications: 41 scientists 387–396 publications: 32 scientists 397–406 publications: 23 scientists 407–416 publications: 28 scientists 417–426 publications: 27 scientists 427–436 publications: 25 scientists 437–446 publications: 23 scientists 447–456 publications: 23 scientists 457–466 publications: 20 scientists 467–476 publications: 12 scientists 477–486 publications: 24 scientists 487–496 publications: 18 scientists 497–506 publications: 12 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 21 scientists 527–536 publications: 12 scientists 537–546 publications: 8 scientists 547–556 publications: 16 scientists 557–566 publications: 3 scientists 567–576 publications: 11 scientists 577–586 publications: 6 scientists 587–596 publications: 5 scientists 597–606 publications: 6 scientists 607–616 publications: 7 scientists 617–626 publications: 7 scientists 627–636 publications: 10 scientists 637–646 publications: 4 scientists 647–656 publications: 3 scientists 657–658 publications: 2 scientists 659+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 659+

This scientist: 307 publications — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more.

Paul M. Danehy D-index placement in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul M. Danehy sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 83 scientists 31 D-Index: 113 scientists 32 D-Index: 144 scientists 33 D-Index: 153 scientists 34 D-Index: 189 scientists 35 D-Index: 158 scientists 36 D-Index: 139 scientists 37 D-Index: 127 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 126 scientists 40 D-Index: 104 scientists 41 D-Index: 100 scientists 42 D-Index: 107 scientists 43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44 D-Index: 103 scientists 45 D-Index: 79 scientists 46 D-Index: 88 scientists 47 D-Index: 70 scientists 48 D-Index: 83 scientists 49 D-Index: 44 scientists 50 D-Index: 64 scientists 51 D-Index: 56 scientists 52 D-Index: 50 scientists 53 D-Index: 48 scientists 54 D-Index: 58 scientists 55 D-Index: 52 scientists 56 D-Index: 48 scientists 57 D-Index: 42 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 37 scientists 61 D-Index: 42 scientists 62 D-Index: 44 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 33 scientists 65 D-Index: 29 scientists 66 D-Index: 23 scientists 67 D-Index: 29 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 19 scientists 70 D-Index: 34 scientists 71 D-Index: 26 scientists 72 D-Index: 19 scientists 73 D-Index: 18 scientists 74 D-Index: 19 scientists 75 D-Index: 14 scientists 76 D-Index: 19 scientists 77 D-Index: 8 scientists 78 D-Index: 18 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 17 scientists 82 D-Index: 11 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 7 scientists 85 D-Index: 9 scientists 86 D-Index: 8 scientists 87 D-Index: 6 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 10 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 4 scientists 93+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 93+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Flow-Tagging Velocimetry for Hypersonic Flows Using Fluorescence of Nitric Oxide

    Paul M. Danehy;A. Frank;P. Houwing;Jodie S. Fox

  • MHz-rate nitric oxide planar laser-induced fluorescence imaging in a Mach 10 hypersonic wind tunnel

    Naibo Jiang;Matthew Webster;Walter R. Lempert;Joseph D. Miller

  • Dot-Projection Photogrammetry and Videogrammetry of Gossamer Space Structures

    Richard S. Pappa;Jonathan T. Black;Joseph R. Blandino;Thomas W. Jones

  • Gas-phase thermal-grating contributions to four-wave mixing

    Phillip H. Paul;Roger L. Farrow;Paul M. Danehy

  • Velocity Profile Measurements in Hypersonic Flows Using Sequentially Imaged Fluorescence-Based Molecular Tagging

    Brett F. Bathel;Paul M. Danehy;Jennifer A. Inman;Stephen B. Jones

  • Coherent Anti-Stokes Raman Spectroscopic Thermometry in a Supersonic Combustor

    A. D. Cutler;P. M. Danehy;R. R. Springer;S. OByrne

  • Dual-Pump Coherent Anti-Stokes Raman Scattering Measurements in a Supersonic Combustor

    S. O'Byrne;P. M. Danehy;S. A. Tedder;A. D. Cutler

  • Large-Eddy/Reynolds-Averaged Navier–Stokes Simulations of Reactive Flow in Dual-Mode Scramjet Combustor

    Jesse A. Fulton;Jack R. Edwards;Hassan A. Hassan;James C. McDaniel

  • Thermal-grating contributions to degenerate four-wave mixing in nitric oxide

    Paul M. Danehy;Phillip H. Paul;Roger L. Farrow

  • Seedless velocimetry at 100 kHz with picosecond-laser electronic-excitation tagging

    Naibo Jiang;Jason G. Mance;Mikhail N. Slipchenko;Josef J. Felver

  • NO PLIF Study of Hypersonic Transition Over a Discrete Hemispherical Roughness Element

    Paul M. Danehy;Brett F. Bathel;Christopher Ivey;Jennifer A. Inman

  • Dual-Pump Coherent Anti-Stokes Raman Scattering Temperature and CO2 Concentration Measurements

    Robert P. Lucht;Viswanathan Velur-Natarajan;Campbell D. Carter;Keith D. Grinstead

  • Width-increased dual-pump enhanced coherent anti-Stokes Raman spectroscopy

    Sarah A. Tedder;Jeffrey L. Wheeler;Andrew D. Cutler;Paul M. Danehy

  • OH PLIF visualization of the UVa supersonic combustion experiment: configuration A

    Craig T. Johansen;Colin D. McRae;Paul M. Danehy;Emanuela Gallo

  • FLEET Velocimetry for Aerodynamics

    Unknown

  • NO PLIF imaging in the CUBRC 48-inch shock tunnel

    N. Jiang;J. Bruzzese;R. Patton;J. Sutton

  • Laminar boundary layer separation at a fin-body junction in a hypersonic flow

    A.F.P. Houwing;D.R. Smith;J.S. Fox;P.M. Danehy

  • Development of a Premixed Combustion Capability for Dual-Mode Scramjet Experiments

    Robert D. Rockwell;Christopher P. Goyne;Harsha Chelliah;James C. McDaniel

  • Nonequilibrium Supersonic Freestream Studied Using Coherent Anti-Stokes Raman Spectroscopy

    Andrew D. Cutler;Luca M. L. Cantu;Emanuela C. A. Gallo;Rob Baurle

  • Numerical and experimental analysis of spallation phenomena

    Alexandre Martin;Sean C. C. Bailey;Francesco Panerai;Raghava S. C. Davuluri

Frequent Co-Authors

Naibo Jiang
Naibo Jiang The Ohio State University
James C. McDaniel
James C. McDaniel University of Virginia
James R. Gord
James R. Gord United States Air Force Research Laboratory
Terrence R. Meyer
Terrence R. Meyer Purdue University West Lafayette
Noel T. Clemens
Noel T. Clemens The University of Texas at Austin
Jack R. Edwards
Jack R. Edwards North Carolina State University
Sean C. C. Bailey
Sean C. C. Bailey University of Kentucky
Robert P. Lucht
Robert P. Lucht Purdue University West Lafayette
Kazuyoshi Takayama
Kazuyoshi Takayama Tohoku University
Ronald K. Hanson
Ronald K. Hanson Stanford University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students exploring fields related to Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, understanding alternative career paths can be valuable. One such pathway is speech-language pathology, which has its own unique entry requirements and challenges. If you're considering this field, it's helpful to review speech pathology grad school acceptance rates to gauge competitiveness and plan your application strategy accordingly.

When selecting a program, some may prefer the easiest audiology programs to get into, which offer more accessible admission criteria. This can be a strategic choice for students seeking to enter healthcare fields that complement engineering skills, such as assistive technology design.

The cost is another crucial factor. Prospective students should research how much does an online speech pathology degree cost to ensure it fits their budget, especially since tuition and fees vary widely across institutions offering these programs.

Veterans looking to transition into new careers will find helpful resources like online speech pathology bachelor degree for veterans, which highlights tailored programs and benefits available to those with military backgrounds. Exploring such options can open doors to rewarding professions that align with technical expertise and a passion for helping others.

Best Scientists Citing Paul M. Danehy

Recently Published Articles