World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
47
Citations
17954
World Ranking
18540
National Ranking
7569

Saul J. Sharkis publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Saul J. Sharkis sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 127 publications — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Saul J. Sharkis D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Saul J. Sharkis sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Saul J. Sharkis was affiliated with the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine in the United States. Their academic career was connected to one of the leading medical institutions, where research and education are highly emphasized.

The data provided does not include a list of published papers, frequent co-authors, or specific research topics attributed to Saul J. Sharkis, and no book publications or awards have been recorded. Additionally, no detailed information about main fields of study, subfields, or specific topics of research is available.

Because no detailed publication or research focus information is present, a precise outline of their scientific contributions cannot be given. Nonetheless, the association with Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine indicates involvement in medical or biomedical research disciplines, given the institution's focus.

The scientist is noted as deceased. All references to their career or work are therefore framed in the past tense.

Best Publications

  • Multi-Organ, Multi-Lineage Engraftment by a Single Bone Marrow-Derived Stem Cell

    Diane S. Krause;Neil D. Theise;Michael I. Collector;Octavian Henegariu

  • A stem cell–like chromatin pattern may predispose tumor suppressor genes to DNA hypermethylation and heritable silencing

    Joyce E Ohm;Kelly M McGarvey;Xiaobing Yu;Linzhao Cheng

  • A low level of reactive oxygen species selects for primitive hematopoietic stem cells that may reside in the low-oxygenic niche

    Yoon Young Jang;Saul J. Sharkis

  • Multilineage gene expression precedes commitment in the hemopoietic system

    Ming Hu;Diane Krause;Mel Greaves;Saul Sharkis

  • Hematopoietic stem cells convert into liver cells within days without fusion.

    Yoon Young Jang;Michael I. Collector;Stephen B. Baylin;Anna Mae Diehl

  • Inhibition of apoptosis by BCR-ABL in chronic myeloid leukemia

    Atul Bedi;Barbara A. Zehnbauer;James P. Barber;Saul J. Sharkis

  • Transient low doses of DNA-demethylating agents exert durable antitumor effects on hematological and epithelial tumor cells.

    Hsing Chen Tsai;Huili Li;Leander Van Neste;Yi Cai

  • Distinct Patterns of Inactivation of p15INK4B and p16INK4A Characterize the Major Types of Hematological Malignancies

    James G. Herman;Curt I. Civin;Jean Pierre J. Issa;Michael I. Collector

  • Separation of pluripotent haematopoietic stem cells from spleen colony-forming cells

    Richard J. Jones;John E. Wagner;Paul Celano;Milada S. Zicha

  • Activin A maintains self-renewal and regulates fibroblast growth factor, Wnt, and bone morphogenic protein pathways in human embryonic stem cells.

    Lei Xiao;Xuan Yuan;Saul J. Sharkis

  • Characterization of murine CD34, a marker for hematopoietic progenitor and stem cells

    DS Krause;T Ito;MJ Fackler;OM Smith

  • Mouse splenic and bone marrow cell populations that express high-affinity Fc epsilon receptors and produce interleukin 4 are highly enriched in basophils.

    Robert A. Seder;William E. Paul;Ann M. Dvorak;Saul J. Sharkis

  • Generation of endoderm‐derived human induced pluripotent stem cells from primary hepatocytes

    Hua Liu;Zhaohui Ye;Yonghak Kim;Saul Sharkis

  • Elimination of Acute Myelogenous Leukemic Cells From Marrow and Tumor Suspensions in the Rat With 4-Hydroperoxycyclophosphamide

    Saul J. Sharkis;George W. Santos;Michael Colvin

  • A clinically relevant population of leukemic CD34(+)CD38(-) cells in acute myeloid leukemia.

    Jonathan M. Gerber;B. Douglas Smith;Brownhilda Ngwang;Hao Zhang

  • Characterization of mouse lymphohematopoietic stem cells lacking spleen colony-forming activity

    R J Jones;M I Collector;J P Barber;M S Vala

  • In Vivo Liver Regeneration Potential of Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells from Diverse Origins

    Hua Liu;Yonghak Kim;Saul Sharkis;Luigi Marchionni

  • Two Phases of Engraftment Established by Serial Bone Marrow Transplantation in Mice

    Richard J. Jones;Paul Celano;Saul J. Sharkis;Lyle L. Sensenbrenner

  • Antigenic analysis of hematopoiesis. V. Characterization of My-10 antigen expression by normal lymphohematopoietic progenitor cells.

    L. C. Strauss;S. D. Rowley;V. F. la Russa;S. J. Sharkis

  • Hematopoietic Stem Cell Tracking In Vivo: A Comparison of Short-Term and Long-Term Repopulating Cells

    Sophie M. Lanzkron;Michael I. Collector;Saul J. Sharkis

Frequent Co-Authors

Richard J. Jones
Richard J. Jones Johns Hopkins University
Stephen B. Baylin
Stephen B. Baylin Johns Hopkins University
Curt I. Civin
Curt I. Civin University of Maryland, Baltimore
Constance A. Griffin
Constance A. Griffin Johns Hopkins University
Diane S. Krause
Diane S. Krause Yale University
Linzhao Cheng
Linzhao Cheng Chinese Academy of Sciences
George W. Santos
George W. Santos Johns Hopkins University
Jerry L. Spivak
Jerry L. Spivak Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
James Barber
James Barber Imperial College London
Zhaohui Ye
Zhaohui Ye US Food and Drug Administration

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Biology and Biochemistry opens up diverse and rewarding career paths, especially as online education expands your options. Students may consider specializing further with fields like dietetics, and can compare top dietitian masters programs to prepare for nutrition-focused careers in healthcare, research, and education.

For those seeking a quicker transition into healthcare roles, enrolling in medical assistant programs online michigan offers practical skills and strong job demand with flexible learning options, some featuring financial aid.

Professionals looking to advance their scope may choose a ma to lpn bridge program online, which allows medical assistants to step up into licensed practical nursing roles, often in less time than traditional nursing pathways.

Finally, for those interested in greater academic flexibility and accelerated timelines, numerous accredited online biology programs are available, letting students fast-track their studies while balancing other commitments. These opportunities support a variety of roles in healthcare, laboratory research, and biotechnology industries.

Best Scientists Citing Saul J. Sharkis

Recently Published Articles