World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
53
Citations
10647
World Ranking
5093
National Ranking
2279

Sandhitsu R. Das publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sandhitsu R. Das sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 289 publications — 81st percentile

81% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Sandhitsu R. Das D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sandhitsu R. Das sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 53 D-Index — 48th percentile

48% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Sandhitsu R. Das is affiliated with the University of Pennsylvania in the United States. Their research spans across medicine and neuroscience, with a particular focus on subfields including radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging, psychiatry and mental health, cognitive neuroscience, physiology, and neurology.

The primary topics of Sandhitsu R. Das's research work include:

  • Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Alzheimer's Disease Research and Treatments
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Neurological Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Epilepsy Research and Treatment

Frequently publishing in venues such as:

  • Alzheimer's & Dementia
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • JAMA Neurology
  • Neurobiology of Aging
  • arXiv (Cornell University)

Sandhitsu R. Das has coauthored extensively with multiple researchers, including Paul A. Yushkevich, David A. Wolk, Laura E.M. Wisse, Long Xie, and John A. Detre.

Some of their recent publications include:

  • The ANTsX ecosystem for quantitative biological and medical imaging, 2021, Scientific Reports
  • The effects of direct brain stimulation in humans depend on frequency, amplitude, and white-matter proximity, 2020, Brain Stimulation
  • Contribution of mixed pathology to medial temporal lobe atrophy in Alzheimer's disease, 2020, Alzheimer's & Dementia
  • 7T Epilepsy Task Force Consensus Recommendations on the Use of 7T MRI in Clinical Practice, 2020, Neurology
  • Three-dimensional mapping of neurofibrillary tangle burden in the human medial temporal lobe, 2021, Brain

Best Publications

  • Large-scale evaluation of ANTs and FreeSurfer cortical thickness measurements.

    Nicholas J. Tustison;Philip A. Cook;Arno Klein;Gang Song

  • Automated Volumetry and Regional Thickness Analysis of Hippocampal Subfields and Medial Temporal Cortical Structures in Mild Cognitive Impairment

    Paul A. Yushkevich;John B. Pluta;Hongzhi Wang;Long Xie

  • Closed-loop stimulation of temporal cortex rescues functional networks and improves memory.

    Youssef Ezzyat;Paul A. Wanda;Deborah F. Levy;Allison Kadel

  • Registration based cortical thickness measurement

    Sandhitsu R. Das;Brian B. Avants;Murray Grossman;James C. Gee

  • Direct Electrical Stimulation of the Human Entorhinal Region and Hippocampus Impairs Memory

    Joshua Jacobs;Jonathan Miller;Sang Ah Lee;Sang Ah Lee;Tom Coffey

  • Nearly Automatic Segmentation of Hippocampal Subfields in In Vivo Focal T2-Weighted MRI

    Paul A. Yushkevich;Hongzhi Wang;John Pluta;Sandhitsu R. Das

  • Direct Brain Stimulation Modulates Encoding States and Memory Performance in Humans

    Youssef Ezzyat;James E. Kragel;John F. Burke;Deborah F. Levy

  • A learning-based wrapper method to correct systematic errors in automatic image segmentation: consistently improved performance in hippocampus, cortex and brain segmentation.

    Hongzhi Wang;Sandhitsu R. Das;Jung Wook Suh;Murat Altinay

  • Glutamate imaging (GluCEST) lateralizes epileptic foci in nonlesional temporal lobe epilepsy.

    Kathryn Adamiak Davis;Ravi Prakash Reddy Nanga;Sandhitsu Das;Stephanie H. Chen

  • Characterizing the human hippocampus in aging and Alzheimer's disease using a computational atlas derived from ex vivo MRI and histology.

    Daniel H Adler;Laura E M Wisse;Ranjit Ittyerah;John B Pluta

  • A high-resolution computational atlas of the human hippocampus from postmortem magnetic resonance imaging at 9.4 T.

    Paul A. Yushkevich;Brian B. Avants;John Pluta;Sandhitsu R. Das

  • Lateralized hippocampal oscillations underlie distinct aspects of human spatial memory and navigation.

    Jonathan F Miller;Andrew J. Watrous;Melina Eirene Tsitsiklis;Sang Ah Lee

  • A protocol for manual segmentation of medial temporal lobe subregions in 7 Tesla MRI.

    D. Berron;D. Berron;P. Vieweg;A. Hochkeppler;J.B. Pluta

  • Bias in estimation of hippocampal atrophy using deformation-based morphometry arises from asymmetric global normalization: an illustration in ADNI 3 T MRI data.

    Paul A. Yushkevich;Brian B. Avants;Sandhitsu R. Das;John Pluta

  • Virtual resection predicts surgical outcome for drug-resistant epilepsy.

    Lohith G Kini;John M Bernabei;Fadi Mikhail;Fadi Mikhail;Peter Hadar;Peter Hadar

  • In vivo analysis of hippocampal subfield atrophy in mild cognitive impairment via semi-automatic segmentation of T2-weighted MRI.

    John Pluta;Paul Yushkevich;Sandhitsu Das;David Wolk

  • Dynamic Theta Networks in the Human Medial Temporal Lobe Support Episodic Memory

    Ethan A. Solomon;Joel M. Stein;Sandhitsu Das;Richard Gorniak

  • Arterial spin labeled MRI in prodromal Alzheimer's disease: A multi-site study

    Ze Wang;Sandhitsu R. Das;Sharon X. Xie;Steven E. Arnold

  • The effects of direct brain stimulation in humans depend on frequency, amplitude, and white-matter proximity.

    Uma R. Mohan;Andrew J. Watrous;Jonathan F. Miller;Bradley C. Lega

  • Automated segmentation of medial temporal lobe subregions on in vivo T1-weighted MRI in early stages of Alzheimer's disease

    Long Xie;Laura E. M. Wisse;John Pluta;Robin de Flores

  • Theta band power increases in the posterior hippocampus predict successful episodic memory encoding in humans

    Jui Jui Lin;Michael D. Rugg;Sandhitsu Das;Joel Stein

  • Increased functional connectivity within medial temporal lobe in mild cognitive impairment.

    Sandhitsu R. Das;John Pluta;Lauren Mancuso;Dasha Kliot

Frequent Co-Authors

Paul A. Yushkevich
Paul A. Yushkevich University of Pennsylvania
David A. Wolk
David A. Wolk University of Pennsylvania
Murray Grossman
Murray Grossman University of Pennsylvania
Joel M. Stein
Joel M. Stein University of Pennsylvania
John A. Detre
John A. Detre University of Pennsylvania
Kathryn A. Davis
Kathryn A. Davis University of Pennsylvania
Brian B. Avants
Brian B. Avants University of Virginia
David J. Irwin
David J. Irwin University of Pennsylvania
John Q. Trojanowski
John Q. Trojanowski University of Pennsylvania
James C. Gee
James C. Gee University of Pennsylvania

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying neuroscience opens doors to a variety of related fields and flexible learning opportunities. For those interested in mental health and therapy, you may want to explore accelerated mft programs that allow you to earn a master's degree in marriage and family therapy in less time.

If your passion is psychology, advancing your expertise with a psyd psychology online program offers a pathway to clinical practice and leadership roles from the comfort of your home.

Students looking for a rapid start in the workforce might consider 2 year accelerated bachelor degrees in fields closely related to neuroscience. This fast-track approach can quickly provide skills needed for entry-level positions or continued graduate studies.

Finally, when deciding what area to specialize in, it's helpful to review what bachelors degree should i get to ensure your studies align with your career and earning goals. These online options provide versatility, letting you balance studies with personal or professional commitments while pursuing a neuroscience-related career path.

Best Scientists Citing Sandhitsu R. Das

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles