World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking National Ranking Publications Citations
Earth Science 37 6700 2349 83 7958

Robert W. Frey publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Robert W. Frey between 1969 and 1992, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Robert W. Frey published across 24 years, from 1969 to 1992, averaging 3.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 7 publications in 1984. 6 of the 83 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1969 to 1992. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 7. Peak 7 publications in 1984. 1969: 4 publications 1970: 4 publications 1971: 2 publications 1972: 2 publications 1973: 6 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 4 publications 1976: 1 publication 1977: 2 publications 1978: 5 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 3 publications 1981: 2 publications 1982: 4 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 7 publications 1985: 7 publications 1986: 4 publications 1987: 4 publications 1988: 4 publications 1989: 5 publications 1990: 7 publications 1991: 4 publications 1992: 2 publications
1969 1992

83 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Robert W. Frey: publications per year, 1969 to 1992
Year Publications
1969 4
1970 4
1971 2
1972 2
1973 6
1974 0
1975 4
1976 1
1977 2
1978 5
1979 0
1980 3
1981 2
1982 4
1983 0
1984 7
1985 7
1986 4
1987 4
1988 4
1989 5
1990 7
1991 4
1992 2
Total 83
Download as CSV

Robert W. Frey publication distribution in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Earth Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert W. Frey sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 603+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 557. Most scientists, 557, have 128–137 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 603 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 78–87 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 5 scientists 48–57 publications: 33 scientists 58–67 publications: 94 scientists 68–77 publications: 161 scientists 78–87 publications: 278 scientists 88–97 publications: 376 scientists 98–107 publications: 404 scientists 108–117 publications: 484 scientists 118–127 publications: 540 scientists 128–137 publications: 557 scientists 138–147 publications: 491 scientists 148–157 publications: 495 scientists 158–167 publications: 458 scientists 168–177 publications: 490 scientists 178–187 publications: 414 scientists 188–197 publications: 401 scientists 198–207 publications: 333 scientists 208–217 publications: 292 scientists 218–227 publications: 290 scientists 228–237 publications: 262 scientists 238–247 publications: 243 scientists 248–257 publications: 208 scientists 258–267 publications: 185 scientists 268–277 publications: 147 scientists 278–287 publications: 128 scientists 288–297 publications: 119 scientists 298–307 publications: 120 scientists 308–317 publications: 107 scientists 318–327 publications: 93 scientists 328–337 publications: 87 scientists 338–347 publications: 64 scientists 348–357 publications: 87 scientists 358–367 publications: 60 scientists 368–377 publications: 60 scientists 378–387 publications: 34 scientists 388–397 publications: 50 scientists 398–407 publications: 44 scientists 408–417 publications: 31 scientists 418–427 publications: 39 scientists 428–437 publications: 27 scientists 438–447 publications: 36 scientists 448–457 publications: 27 scientists 458–467 publications: 29 scientists 468–477 publications: 30 scientists 478–487 publications: 19 scientists 488–497 publications: 15 scientists 498–507 publications: 18 scientists 508–517 publications: 19 scientists 518–527 publications: 16 scientists 528–537 publications: 10 scientists 538–547 publications: 11 scientists 548–557 publications: 14 scientists 558–567 publications: 11 scientists 568–577 publications: 7 scientists 578–587 publications: 14 scientists 588–597 publications: 5 scientists 598–602 publications: 4 scientists 603+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 603+

This scientist: 83 publications — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 603 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Earth Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,176 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 5
48–57 33
58–67 94
68–77 161
78–87 278 83
88–97 376
98–107 404
108–117 484
118–127 540
128–137 557
138–147 491
148–157 495
158–167 458
168–177 490
178–187 414
188–197 401
198–207 333
208–217 292
218–227 290
228–237 262
238–247 243
248–257 208
258–267 185
268–277 147
278–287 128
288–297 119
298–307 120
308–317 107
318–327 93
328–337 87
338–347 64
348–357 87
358–367 60
368–377 60
378–387 34
388–397 50
398–407 44
408–417 31
418–427 39
428–437 27
438–447 36
448–457 27
458–467 29
468–477 30
478–487 19
488–497 15
498–507 18
508–517 19
518–527 16
528–537 10
538–547 11
548–557 14
558–567 11
568–577 7
578–587 14
588–597 5
598–602 4
603+ 100
Download as CSV

Robert W. Frey D-index placement in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Earth Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert W. Frey sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 77 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 106+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 389. Most scientists, 389, have 36 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 106 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 37 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 144 scientists 31 D-Index: 215 scientists 32 D-Index: 278 scientists 33 D-Index: 379 scientists 34 D-Index: 366 scientists 35 D-Index: 372 scientists 36 D-Index: 389 scientists 37 D-Index: 366 scientists 38 D-Index: 344 scientists 39 D-Index: 349 scientists 40 D-Index: 296 scientists 41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42 D-Index: 277 scientists 43 D-Index: 279 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 257 scientists 46 D-Index: 212 scientists 47 D-Index: 202 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 204 scientists 50 D-Index: 183 scientists 51 D-Index: 178 scientists 52 D-Index: 182 scientists 53 D-Index: 178 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 117 scientists 56 D-Index: 163 scientists 57 D-Index: 120 scientists 58 D-Index: 113 scientists 59 D-Index: 136 scientists 60 D-Index: 135 scientists 61 D-Index: 96 scientists 62 D-Index: 103 scientists 63 D-Index: 83 scientists 64 D-Index: 103 scientists 65 D-Index: 83 scientists 66 D-Index: 89 scientists 67 D-Index: 92 scientists 68 D-Index: 89 scientists 69 D-Index: 78 scientists 70 D-Index: 75 scientists 71 D-Index: 53 scientists 72 D-Index: 62 scientists 73 D-Index: 54 scientists 74 D-Index: 35 scientists 75 D-Index: 52 scientists 76 D-Index: 50 scientists 77 D-Index: 32 scientists 78 D-Index: 37 scientists 79 D-Index: 20 scientists 80 D-Index: 33 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 34 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 24 scientists 85 D-Index: 19 scientists 86 D-Index: 18 scientists 87 D-Index: 26 scientists 88 D-Index: 30 scientists 89 D-Index: 17 scientists 90 D-Index: 21 scientists 91 D-Index: 19 scientists 92 D-Index: 15 scientists 93 D-Index: 14 scientists 94 D-Index: 20 scientists 95 D-Index: 9 scientists 96 D-Index: 10 scientists 97 D-Index: 15 scientists 98 D-Index: 13 scientists 99 D-Index: 3 scientists 100 D-Index: 13 scientists 101 D-Index: 3 scientists 102 D-Index: 9 scientists 103 D-Index: 4 scientists 104 D-Index: 6 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 106+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 106 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Earth Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,176 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 144
31 215
32 278
33 379
34 366
35 372
36 389
37 366 37
38 344
39 349
40 296
41 289
42 277
43 279
44 248
45 257
46 212
47 202
48 207
49 204
50 183
51 178
52 182
53 178
54 163
55 117
56 163
57 120
58 113
59 136
60 135
61 96
62 103
63 83
64 103
65 83
66 89
67 92
68 89
69 78
70 75
71 53
72 62
73 54
74 35
75 52
76 50
77 32
78 37
79 20
80 33
81 36
82 34
83 34
84 24
85 19
86 18
87 26
88 30
89 17
90 21
91 19
92 15
93 14
94 20
95 9
96 10
97 15
98 13
99 3
100 13
101 3
102 9
103 4
104 6
105 6
106+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Robert W. Frey is affiliated with the University of Georgia in the United States.

There is no publicly available data regarding their recent papers, co-authors, or frequent publication venues.

No information is provided about book publications or published works in specific academic fields and subfields of study.

Similarly, there is an absence of data covering main topics of research or any academic awards received.

Best Publications

  • Trace fossil nomenclature and the Planolites-Palaeophycus dilemma

    S. George Pemberton;Robert W. Frey

  • Ophiomorpha: Its morphologic, taxonomic, and environmental significance

    Robert W. Frey;Robert W. Frey;Robert W. Frey;James D. Howard;James D. Howard;James D. Howard;Wayne A. Pryor;Wayne A. Pryor;Wayne A. Pryor

  • Uniformity in marine invertebrate ichnology

    Robert W. Frey;Adolf Seilacher

  • Tracemaking Activities of Crabs and Their Environmental Significance: The Ichnogenus Psilonichnus

    Robert W. Frey;H. Allen Curran;S. George Pemberton

  • Coastal Salt Marshes

    Robert W. Frey;Paul B. Basan

  • Morphological, ethological, and environmental significance of the ichnogenera Scoyenia and Ancorichnus

    Robert W. Frey;S. George Pemberton;J. A. Fagerstrom

  • Characteristic trace fossils in nearshore to offshore sequences, Upper Cretaceous of east-central Utah

    James D. Howard;Robert W. Frey

  • Ichnofacies and bathymetry; a passive relationship

    Robert W. Frey;S. George Pemberton;Thomas D. A. Saunders

  • The ichnotaxonomy of Conostichus and other plug-shaped ichnofossils

    S. George Pemberton;Robert W. Frey;Richard G. Bromley

  • The Glossifungites Ichnofacies: Modern Examples From The Georgia Coast, U. S. A.

    S. George Pemberton;Robert W. Frey

  • The Psilonichnus Ichnocoenose, and Its Relationship to Adjacent Marine and Nonmarine Ichnocoenoses along the Georgia Coast

    Robert W. Frey;S. George Pemberton

  • Biogenic Structures in Outcrops and Cores. I. Approaches to Ichnology

    Robert W. Frey;S. George Pemberton

  • The Conceptual Framework of Ichnology

    S. George Pemberton;Robert W. Frey;Michael J. Ranger;James MacEachern

  • TRACE FOSSILS FROM THE PANTHER MEMBER, STAR POINT FORMATION (UPPER CRETACEOUS), COAL CREEK CANYON, UTAH

    Robert W. Frey;James D. Howard

  • Trace fossils and hummocky cross-stratification, upper Cretaceous of Utah

    Robert W. Frey

  • Diagenesis of organic matter in georgia salt marshes

    Marilyn L. Fogel;E. Kent Sprague;Andrew P. Gize;Robert W. Frey

  • Concepts in the Study of Biogenic Sedimentary Structures

    Unknown

  • Ichnology of American chalks: the Selma Group (Upper Cretaceous), western Alabama

    Robert W. Frey;Richard G. Bromley

  • Quantitative methods in ichnology: spatial distribution among populations

    S. George Pemberton;Robert W. Frey

  • Marine event beds and recolonization surfaces as revealed by trace fossil analysis

    R. W. Frey;R. Gold Ring

  • Conichnus and Schaubcylindrichnus; redefined trace fossils from the Upper Cretaceous of the Western Interior

    Robert W. Frey;James D. Howard

  • Trace fossils and depositional sequences in a clastic shelf setting, Upper Cretaceous of Utah

    Unknown

Frequent Co-Authors

S. George Pemberton
S. George Pemberton University of Alberta
Richard G. Bromley
Richard G. Bromley University of Copenhagen
Marilyn L. Fogel
Marilyn L. Fogel University of California, Riverside
James A. MacEachern
James A. MacEachern Simon Fraser University
Adolf Seilacher
Adolf Seilacher Yale University
Brooks B. Ellwood
Brooks B. Ellwood Louisiana State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Earth Science opens many doors, but complementing your knowledge with related fields can enhance your career prospects. For instance, pursuing a masters degree in human resource management online can prepare you for leadership roles within scientific organizations, helping manage teams and projects effectively.

Older adults considering a career change or upgrade will find many flexible options. The highlighted degrees for older adults provide tailored programs that accommodate diverse schedules, making it easier to pursue education in Earth Science or related disciplines.

Additionally, expanding into information management through an online mlis programs accredited ala could be valuable. These programs equip students with skills to curate scientific data and resources crucial for research and public education.

A library science masters can also complement Earth Science studies by focusing on organizing and preserving scientific knowledge, which is vital for academic and environmental institutions.

Best Scientists Citing Robert W. Frey

Recently Published Articles