World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Robert M. Koerner

Robert M. Koerner

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
39
Citations
6921
World Ranking
8304
National Ranking
2966

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
39
Citations
7024
World Ranking
7641
National Ranking
2102

Robert M. Koerner publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert M. Koerner sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 804+

This scientist: 247 publications — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

Robert M. Koerner D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert M. Koerner sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

Overview

Robert M. Koerner was affiliated with Drexel University in the United States. Their research portfolio included work in several areas of biochemistry, genetics, molecular biology, and medicine. Their studies intersected subfields such as physiology, cell biology, and biophysics.

The scientist's main research topics involved:

  • Spaceflight effects on biology
  • Cellular mechanics and interactions
  • Electromagnetic fields and biological effects

One notable publication by Robert M. Koerner was titled "Simulating microgravity using a random positioning machine for inducing cellular responses to mechanotransduction in human osteoblasts", published in 2021 in the journal Review of Scientific Instruments. This paper has been cited 12 times and focused on cellular responses related to microgravity conditions.

Their frequent collaborators included the following researchers:

  • Nadab Wubshet
  • Esmeralda Arreguin-Martinez
  • Mark Nail
  • Hariprasad Annamalai
  • Maria Rousseva

Most of their publications appeared in Review of Scientific Instruments, reflecting a concentration of research output in that venue. The work conducted by Robert M. Koerner had a multidisciplinary approach encompassing experimental and theoretical perspectives on biological systems exposed to altered physical environments.

Best Publications

  • Designing with Geosynthetics

    Robert M. Koerner

  • Geotechnical Aspects of Landfill Design and Construction

    Xuede Qian;Robert M. Koerner;Donald H. Gray

  • Antioxidant depletion lifetime in high density polyethylene geomembranes

    Y. G. Hsuan;Robert M. Koerner

  • Leachate in landfills: the stability issues

    R.M Koerner;T.-Y Soong

  • Method of removing contaminants from contaminated soil in situ

    Robert M. Koerner;Arthur E. Lord;John E. Brugger

  • GEOSYNTHETIC REINFORCED SEGMENTAL RETAINING WALLS

    Robert M Koerner;Te-Yang Soong

  • A data base, statistics and recommendations regarding 171 failed geosynthetic reinforced mechanically stabilized earth (MSE) walls

    Robert M. Koerner;George R. Koerner

  • An extended data base and recommendations regarding 320 failed geosynthetic reinforced mechanically stabilized earth (MSE) walls

    Robert M. Koerner;George R. Koerner

  • Stability Assessment of Ten Large Landfill Failures

    Robert M. Koerner;Te-Yang Soong

  • Long-term temperature monitoring of geomembranes at dry and wet landfills

    G.R. Koerner;R.M. Koerner

  • Geotextile tube assessment using a hanging bag test

    George R. Koerner;Robert M. Koerner

  • ARRHENIUS MODELING TO PREDICT GEOSYNTHETIC DEGRADATION

    Robert M. Koerner;Arthur E. Lord;Yick H. Hsuan

  • Slope Stability of Geosynthetic Clay Liner Test Plots

    David E. Daniel;Robert M. Koerner;Rudolph Bonaparte;Robert E. Landreth

  • Stability and tension considerations regarding cover soils on geomembrane lined slopes

    Robert M. Koerner;Bao-Lin Hwu

  • Waste Containment Facilities: Guidance for Construction, Quality Assurance, and Quality Control of Liner and Cover Systems

    David E. Daniel;Robert M. Koerner

  • Translational failure analysis of landfills

    Xuede Qian;Robert M. Koerner;Donald H. Gray

  • Acoustic Emission Behavior and Monitoring of Soils

    RM Koerner;WM McCabe;AE Lord

  • Overview of acoustic emission monitoring of rock structures

    R. M. Koerner;W. M. McCabe;A. E. Lord

  • Puncture Protection of Geomembranes Part II: Experimental

    D. Narejo;R.M. Koerner;R.F. Wilson-Fahmy

  • Experimental Behavior of Polymeric Geogrids in Pullout

    Ragui F. Wilson‐Fahmy;Robert M. Koerner;Leonard J. Sansone

Frequent Co-Authors

David E. Daniel
David E. Daniel The University of Texas at Dallas
Richard J. Bathurst
Richard J. Bathurst Royal Military College of Canada

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

With the evolving landscape of engineering and technology, exploring complementary online degree options can further boost your professional prospects. Many students combine their technical foundation with specializations in management, communication, or legal skills to stand out in today's workforce.

For example, a social media marketing degree online equips tech-savvy students with expertise in digital branding, audience engagement, and analytics – valuable assets in product development or tech startups. If you're interested in hospitality or service management within technology-driven industries, hospitality management courses online offer a fast-track way to gain leadership skills.

Those looking to expand their business acumen can pursue the cheapest online mba no gmat aacsb, a flexible option for gaining management and entrepreneurial expertise without additional testing barriers. Likewise, a solid grounding in legal concepts is valuable for tech professionals. Consider aba approved online paralegal programs to enhance your understanding of intellectual property, contracts, and regulatory compliance.

By pairing your engineering or technology studies with these related online degrees, you can create diverse career pathways and increase your adaptability in a competitive job market.

Best Scientists Citing Robert M. Koerner

Recently Published Articles