World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Earth Science

D-Index
36
Citations
3707
World Ranking
7398
National Ranking
759

Neil Dixon publication distribution in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Earth Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Neil Dixon sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 5 scientists 48–57 publications: 33 scientists 58–67 publications: 94 scientists 68–77 publications: 161 scientists 78–87 publications: 278 scientists 88–97 publications: 376 scientists 98–107 publications: 404 scientists 108–117 publications: 484 scientists 118–127 publications: 540 scientists 128–137 publications: 557 scientists 138–147 publications: 491 scientists 148–157 publications: 495 scientists 158–167 publications: 458 scientists 168–177 publications: 490 scientists 178–187 publications: 414 scientists 188–197 publications: 401 scientists 198–207 publications: 333 scientists 208–217 publications: 292 scientists 218–227 publications: 290 scientists 228–237 publications: 262 scientists 238–247 publications: 243 scientists 248–257 publications: 208 scientists 258–267 publications: 185 scientists 268–277 publications: 147 scientists 278–287 publications: 128 scientists 288–297 publications: 119 scientists 298–307 publications: 120 scientists 308–317 publications: 107 scientists 318–327 publications: 93 scientists 328–337 publications: 87 scientists 338–347 publications: 64 scientists 348–357 publications: 87 scientists 358–367 publications: 60 scientists 368–377 publications: 60 scientists 378–387 publications: 34 scientists 388–397 publications: 50 scientists 398–407 publications: 44 scientists 408–417 publications: 31 scientists 418–427 publications: 39 scientists 428–437 publications: 27 scientists 438–447 publications: 36 scientists 448–457 publications: 27 scientists 458–467 publications: 29 scientists 468–477 publications: 30 scientists 478–487 publications: 19 scientists 488–497 publications: 15 scientists 498–507 publications: 18 scientists 508–517 publications: 19 scientists 518–527 publications: 16 scientists 528–537 publications: 10 scientists 538–547 publications: 11 scientists 548–557 publications: 14 scientists 558–567 publications: 11 scientists 568–577 publications: 7 scientists 578–587 publications: 14 scientists 588–597 publications: 5 scientists 598–602 publications: 4 scientists 603+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 603+

This scientist: 136 publications — 31st percentile

31% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 603 publications or more.

Neil Dixon D-index placement in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Earth Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Neil Dixon sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 144 scientists 31 D-Index: 215 scientists 32 D-Index: 278 scientists 33 D-Index: 379 scientists 34 D-Index: 366 scientists 35 D-Index: 372 scientists 36 D-Index: 389 scientists 37 D-Index: 366 scientists 38 D-Index: 344 scientists 39 D-Index: 349 scientists 40 D-Index: 296 scientists 41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42 D-Index: 277 scientists 43 D-Index: 279 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 257 scientists 46 D-Index: 212 scientists 47 D-Index: 202 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 204 scientists 50 D-Index: 183 scientists 51 D-Index: 178 scientists 52 D-Index: 182 scientists 53 D-Index: 178 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 117 scientists 56 D-Index: 163 scientists 57 D-Index: 120 scientists 58 D-Index: 113 scientists 59 D-Index: 136 scientists 60 D-Index: 135 scientists 61 D-Index: 96 scientists 62 D-Index: 103 scientists 63 D-Index: 83 scientists 64 D-Index: 103 scientists 65 D-Index: 83 scientists 66 D-Index: 89 scientists 67 D-Index: 92 scientists 68 D-Index: 89 scientists 69 D-Index: 78 scientists 70 D-Index: 75 scientists 71 D-Index: 53 scientists 72 D-Index: 62 scientists 73 D-Index: 54 scientists 74 D-Index: 35 scientists 75 D-Index: 52 scientists 76 D-Index: 50 scientists 77 D-Index: 32 scientists 78 D-Index: 37 scientists 79 D-Index: 20 scientists 80 D-Index: 33 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 34 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 24 scientists 85 D-Index: 19 scientists 86 D-Index: 18 scientists 87 D-Index: 26 scientists 88 D-Index: 30 scientists 89 D-Index: 17 scientists 90 D-Index: 21 scientists 91 D-Index: 19 scientists 92 D-Index: 15 scientists 93 D-Index: 14 scientists 94 D-Index: 20 scientists 95 D-Index: 9 scientists 96 D-Index: 10 scientists 97 D-Index: 15 scientists 98 D-Index: 13 scientists 99 D-Index: 3 scientists 100 D-Index: 13 scientists 101 D-Index: 3 scientists 102 D-Index: 9 scientists 103 D-Index: 4 scientists 104 D-Index: 6 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 106+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 106 D-Index or more.

Overview

Neil Dixon is affiliated with Loughborough University in the United Kingdom. Their research spans across engineering and environmental science, with a focus on landslides, geotechnical engineering, and related hazards.

The main topics covered in their work include:

  • Landslides and related hazards
  • Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis
  • Dam Engineering and Safety
  • Rock Mechanics and Modeling
  • Soil and Unsaturated Flow
  • 3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage
  • Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications

Dixon has contributed publications in several venues, highlighting a breadth of engagement in geotechnical and environmental research. These venues include:

  • Engineering Geology
  • The Photogrammetric Record
  • Landslides
  • Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
  • Geoenvironmental Disasters

Recent published papers by Neil Dixon demonstrate a sustained focus on landslide behavior, numerical modeling, and geotechnical monitoring techniques:

  • Machine learning prediction of landslide deformation behaviour using acoustic emission and rainfall measurements (2021, Engineering Geology)
  • Forecasting the long-term deterioration of a cut slope in high-plasticity clay using a numerical model (2020, Engineering Geology)
  • Automated Registration of SfM-MVS Multitemporal Datasets Using Terrestrial and Oblique Aerial Images (2021, The Photogrammetric Record)
  • Automatic classification of landslide kinematics using acoustic emission measurements and machine learning (2021, Landslides)
  • Development of a Multiphase Numerical Modeling Approach for Hydromechanical Behavior of Clay Embankments Subject to Weather-Driven Deterioration (2023, Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering)

Collaboration forms an important part of Dixon's work. Frequent co-authors include:

  • Alister Smith
  • P. Helm
  • S. G. Glendinning
  • Ashraf El-Hamalawi
  • Lizheng Deng

Their subfields of study are notably interdisciplinary, involving:

  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
  • Civil and Structural Engineering
  • Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality
  • Mechanics of Materials
  • Geology

Neil Dixon's work integrates advanced methods such as machine learning and numerical modeling with traditional geotechnical and environmental engineering approaches, reflecting their focus on understanding and managing landslide and slope stability risks.

Best Publications

  • Engineering properties of municipal solid waste

    Neil Dixon;D. Russell V. Jones

  • Assessment of ground-based monitoring techniques applied to landslide investigations

    S. Uhlemann;S. Uhlemann;Alister Smith;J. Chambers;Neil Dixon

  • Landfill lining stability and integrity: the role of waste settlement

    D.R.V. Jones;N. Dixon

  • Shear strength properties of geomembrane/geotextile interfaces

    D.Russell V. Jones;Neil Dixon

  • Quantification of slope displacement rates using acoustic emission monitoring

    Neil Dixon;M.P. Spriggs

  • Development of a MSW classification system for the evaluation of mechanical properties

    Neil Dixon;Ulrich Langer

  • Impact of predicted climate change on landslide reactivation: case study of Mam Tor, UK

    Neil Dixon;Edmond Brook

  • Climate change and slope stability in the UK: challenges and approaches

    Tom Dijkstra;Neil Dixon

  • 3D ground model development for an active landslide in Lias mudrocks using geophysical, remote sensing and geotechnical methods

    A. J. Merritt;J. E. Chambers;W. Murphy;P. B. Wilkinson

  • Acoustic emission monitoring of slope instability: development of an active waveguide system

    Neil Dixon;Roger Hill;John Kavanagh

  • Quantification of reactivated landslide behaviour using acoustic emission monitoring

    Neil Dixon;M.P. Spriggs;Alister Smith;Philip Meldrum

  • Lime stabilisation for earthworks: a UK perspective

    Paul Beetham;Tom Dijkstra;Neil Dixon;Paul R. Fleming

  • Acoustic emission monitoring of a soil slope: Comparisons with continuous deformation measurements

    Alister Smith;Neil Dixon;Philip Meldrum;Edward Haslam

  • Interface shear strength variability and its use in reliability-based landfill stability analysis

    Neil Dixon;D. R. V. Jones;Gary J. Fowmes

  • Analysis of acoustic emission patterns for monitoring of rock slope deformation mechanisms

    Daniela Codeglia;Neil Dixon;Gary John Fowmes;Gianluca Marcato

  • An acoustic emission landslide early warning system for communities in low-income and middle-income countries

    Neil Dixon;Alister Smith;James A. Flint;R. Khanna

  • Machine learning prediction of landslide deformation behaviour using acoustic emission and rainfall measurements

    Lizheng Deng;Alister Smith;Neil Dixon;Hongyong Yuan

  • Extending natural hazard impacts: an assessment of landslide disruptions on a national road transportation network

    Benjamin F. Postance;John K. Hillier;Tom Dijkstra;Neil Dixon

  • Historical aerial photographs for landslide assessment: two case histories

    Jan Walstra;N Dixon;Jh Chandler

  • Early detection of first-time slope failures using acoustic emission measurements: large-scale physical modelling

    Alister Smith;Neil Dixon;Gary John Fowmes

  • A Review of Pavement Assessment Using Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR)

    Robert D. Evans;Matthew W. Frost;Martyn Stonecliffe-Jones;Neil Dixon

  • Comparing threshold definition techniques for rainfall induced landslides: a national assessment using radar rainfall

    Benjamin F. Postance;John K. Hillier;Tom Dijkstra;Neil Dixon

Frequent Co-Authors

Jonathan E. Chambers
Jonathan E. Chambers British Geological Survey
Jim H. Chandler
Jim H. Chandler Loughborough University
William Powrie
William Powrie University of Southampton
Christopher D. F. Rogers
Christopher D. F. Rogers University of Birmingham
Ian D. Moore
Ian D. Moore Queen's University
W. Andy Take
W. Andy Take Queen's University
Edward Kavazanjian
Edward Kavazanjian Arizona State University
Ian Smalley
Ian Smalley University of Leicester
Véronique Michaud
Véronique Michaud École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
Jan-Anders E. Månson
Jan-Anders E. Månson École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Earth Science opens doors to diverse careers that can benefit from complementary skills. For instance, understanding data management and research methods can be enhanced by exploring what is library science, which teaches effective information organization and retrieval—valuable in scientific research.

Visual documentation is also crucial in Earth Science fields like environmental monitoring and geology. Pursuing photography degrees online can equip students with the skills to capture high-quality images for research, reporting, or education. Notably, there are tailored options such as the best online photography degree programs for veterans, offering flexible learning paths for those who have served.

Additionally, with Earth Science often requiring communication across regions, language skills become important. Considering the cheapest online Spanish degree can be a strategic move, as it helps professionals engage with Spanish-speaking communities and expand their career opportunities.

Exploring these related fields through online degrees can complement foundational Earth Science knowledge and enhance employability in multidisciplinary environments.

Best Scientists Citing Neil Dixon

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles