World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
50
Citations
12621
World Ranking
5369
National Ranking
2937

Robert C. Smith publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert C. Smith sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 180 publications — 62nd percentile

62% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Robert C. Smith D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert C. Smith sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 54th percentile

54% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Robert C. Smith is affiliated with Michigan State University in the United States. Their research centers on medicine, with a specific focus on cardiology and cardiovascular medicine, general health professions, surgery, radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging, and psychiatry and mental health.

The topics most frequently addressed in their work include:

  • Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
  • Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
  • Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
  • Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
  • Empathy and Medical Education
  • Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Surgical Simulation and Training

Recent published papers associated with or relevant to the broader research context include:

  • Making the biopsychosocial model more scientific-its general and specific models, 2020, Social Science & Medicine
  • Archway Phase 3 Trial of the Port Delivery System with Ranibizumab for Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration 2-Year Results, 2023, Ophthalmology
  • A Novel Expert Coaching Model in Urology, Aimed at Accelerating the Learning Curve in Robotic Prostatectomy, 2022, Journal of surgical education
  • Assessing the quality and making appropriate use of historical negative control data: A report of the International Workshop on Genotoxicity Testing (IWGT), 2023, Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis
  • Addressing health inequities for children in immigrant families: Psychologists as leaders and links across systems., 2023, American Psychologist

Frequent collaborators in their scholarly work include:

  • Miles Dalby
  • Rand Wilcox Vanden Berg
  • Jonathan Coleman
  • Behfar Ehdaie
  • Alvin C. Goh

In terms of publication venues, the scientist has substantial contributions in:

  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • UNC Libraries
  • American Heart Journal
  • Journal of Thoracic Oncology
  • National Review of Black Politics

Best Publications

  • Validation of the International Restless Legs Syndrome Study Group rating scale for restless legs syndrome

    Jun Horiguchi;Magdolna Hornyak;Ulrich Voderholzer;Meir Kryger

  • Toward a better definition of the restless legs syndrome

    Arthur S. Walters;Michael S. Aldrich;Richard Allen;Sonia Ancoli‐Israel

  • Interventions for providers to promote a patient‐centred approach in clinical consultations

    Francesca Dwamena;Margaret Holmes‐Rovner;Carolyn M Gaulden;Sarah Jorgenson

  • The patient's story: integrating the patient- and physician-centered approaches to interviewing.

    Robert C. Smith;Ruth B. Hoppe

  • The Effectiveness of Intensive Training for Residents in Interviewing: A Randomized, Controlled Study

    Robert C. Smith;Judith S. Lyles;Jennifer Mettler;Bertram E. Stoffelmayr

  • Psychosocial factors are associated with health care seeking rather than diagnosis in irritable bowel syndrome.

    Robert C. Smith;David S. Greenbaum;Jeffery B. Vancouver;Rebecca C. Henry

  • "Tell me about yourself": The patient-centered interview.

    Frederic W. Platt;David L. Gaspar;John L. Coulehan;Lucy Fox

  • An evidence-based patient-centered method makes the biopsychosocial model scientific

    Robert C. Smith;Auguste H. Fortin;Francesca Dwamena;Richard M. Frankel

  • Primary Care Clinicians Treat Patients with Medically Unexplained Symptoms: A Randomized Controlled Trial

    Robert C. Smith;Judith S. Lyles;Joseph C. Gardiner;Corina Sirbu

  • Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on cognition, symptoms, and smoking in schizophrenia: A randomized controlled study.

    Robert C. Smith;Sylvia Boules;Sanela Mattiuz;Mary Youssef

  • Recognition of depression by internists in primary care: a comparison of internist and "gold standard" psychiatric assessments.

    Paul D. Gerber;James Barrett;Jane Barrett;Eric Manheimer

  • Hyperglycemia associated with the use of atypical antipsychotics.

    Jean-Pierre Lindenmayer;Ann-Marie Nathan;Robert C. Smith

  • Patient-Centered Interviewing: An Evidence-Based Method

    Robert C. Smith

  • Exploration of DSM-IV criteria in primary care patients with medically unexplained symptoms.

    Robert C. Smith;Joseph C. Gardiner;Judith S. Lyles;Corina Sirbu

  • Classification and Diagnosis of Patients with Medically Unexplained Symptoms

    Robert C. Smith;Francesca C. Dwamena

  • The relationship of presenting physical complaints to depressive symptoms in primary care patients.

    Paul D. Gerber;James E. Barrett;Jane A. Barrett;Thomas E. Oxman

  • Goodpasture's Syndrome Associated with Influenza A2 Virus Infection

    Curtis B. Wilson;Robert C. Smith

  • Treating patients with medically unexplained symptoms in primary care.

    Robert C. Smith;Catherine Lein;Clare Collins;Judith S. Lyles

  • Gender differences in Manning criteria in the irritable bowel syndrome.

    Robert C. Smith;David S. Greenbaum;Jeffrey B. Vancouver;Rebecca C. Henry

  • A strategy for improving patient satisfaction by the intensive training of residents in psychosocial medicine: a controlled, randomized study.

    R C Smith;J S Lyles;J A Mettler;A A Marshall

  • Evidence-based guidelines for teaching patient-centered interviewing

    Robert C. Smith;Alicia A. Marshall-Dorsey;Gerald G. Osborn;Valerie Shebroe

Frequent Co-Authors

Richard M. Frankel
Richard M. Frankel Washington University in St. Louis
Barbara A. Given
Barbara A. Given Michigan State University
Clare E. Collins
Clare E. Collins University of Newcastle Australia
Richard P. Allen
Richard P. Allen Johns Hopkins University
Richard N. Baumgartner
Richard N. Baumgartner University of Louisville
Robert I. Haddad
Robert I. Haddad Harvard University
Ann G. Zauber
Ann G. Zauber Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Ahmedin Jemal
Ahmedin Jemal American Cancer Society
David E. Kern
David E. Kern Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Claudia Trenkwalder
Claudia Trenkwalder University of Göttingen

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a psychology degree in the USA opens various doors in mental health and counseling careers. Many students choose to earn their degree online, which offers flexibility and accessibility, especially for working professionals. Whether you aim to become a licensed counselor or advance in specialized psychological fields, understanding state-specific requirements is crucial.

Each state has unique licensing standards. For example, see detailed guidance on how to become a mental health counselor in Greensboro or discover the mental health counselor requirements in Henderson. If you are considering practicing in Hawaii, it’s helpful to review how to become a mental health counselor in Honolulu. Similarly, those looking at Texas can learn how to become a mental health counselor in Houston.

Online degrees in psychology not only prepare you for these diverse locations and roles but also help you meet the educational criteria for licensure. Always research the latest requirements for your chosen career path and state to plan your journey toward becoming a mental health professional.

Best Scientists Citing Robert C. Smith

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles