World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Engineering and Technology
Netherlands
2022

D-Index & Metrics

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
97
Citations
34453
World Ranking
176
National Ranking
5

Medicine

D-Index
101
Citations
36567
World Ranking
8001
National Ranking
311

Rik Huiskes publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rik Huiskes sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 134 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 117 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 59 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 804+

This scientist: 294 publications — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

Rik Huiskes D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rik Huiskes sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 128 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 349 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 425 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 94 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 24 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 97 D-Index — 98th percentile

98% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2022 - Research.com Engineering and Technology in Netherlands Leader Award

Overview

Rik Huiskes was a researcher affiliated with Eindhoven University of Technology in the Netherlands. Their academic career focused on advancing knowledge within their field, although specific details about their main fields of study, subfields, or topics of work have not been provided.

Throughout their career, Rik Huiskes did not have recorded frequent co-authors or a defined list of recent papers available from the data. There were also no noted frequent publication venues or book publications associated with their research activities.

The lack of information on awards or specific recognitions means there are no documented honors in the provided data. Rik Huiskes was known to be deceased, indicating their professional contributions are part of the historical academic record.

Due to missing detailed data on publications and research topics, the focus remains primarily on their institutional affiliation and status as a former active researcher. This profile presents a snapshot based on available information without speculative interpretation or assumptions about their work or impact.

Best Publications

  • The relationship between stress shielding and bone resorption around total hip stems and the effects of flexible materials

    Rik Huiskes;Harrie Weinans;Bert Van Rietbergen

  • Adaptive bone-remodeling theory applied to prosthetic-design analysis

    Rik Huiskes;Harrie Weinans;H.J. Grootenboer;M. Dalstra

  • Effects of mechanical forces on maintenance and adaptation of form in trabecular bone

    Rik Huiskes;Ronald Ruimerman;Ronald Ruimerman;G. Harry van Lenthe;Jan D. Janssen

  • A NEW METHOD TO DETERMINE TRABECULAR BONE ELASTIC PROPERTIES AND LOADING USING MICROMECHANICAL FINITE-ELEMENT MODELS

    B. van Rietbergen;H. Weinans;R. Huiskes;A. Odgaard

  • The behavior of adaptive bone-remodeling simulation models

    Harrie Weinans;Rik Huiskes;H.J. Grootenboer

  • Biophysical stimuli on cells during tissue differentiation at implant interfaces

    P.J. Prendergast;P.J. Prendergast;R. Huiskes;K. Søballe

  • A survey of finite element analysis in orthopedic biomechanics : the first decade

    R. Huiskes;E.Y.S. Chao

  • Articular contact in a three-dimensional model of the knee

    L. Blankevoort;J.H. Kuiper;R. Huiskes;H.J. Grootenboer

  • Finite centroid and helical axis estimation from noisy landmark measurements in the study of human joint kinematics.

    H.J. Woltring;R. Huiskes;A. de Lange;F.E. Veldpaus

  • Proposal for the regulatory mechanism of Wolff's law

    M. G. Mullender;R. Huiskes

  • The envelope of passive knee joint motion

    L. Blankevoort;R. Huiskes;A. de Lange

  • Mechanical and textural properties of pelvic trabecular bone

    M. Dalstra;R. Huiskes;A. Odgaard;L. van Erning

  • Load transfer across the pelvic bone.

    M. Dalstra;R. Huiskes

  • Fabric and elastic principal directions of cancellous bone are closely related

    Anders Odgaard;Jesper Kabel;Bert van Rietbergen;Michel Dalstra

  • The various stress patterns of press-fit, ingrown, and cemented femoral stems.

    R. Huiskes

  • The mechanism of bone remodeling and resorption around press-fitted THA stems

    B. Van Rietbergen;R. Huiskes;H. Weinans;D.R. Sumner

  • Development and validation of a three-dimensional finite element model of the pelvic bone.

    M. Dalstra;R. Huiskes;L.J.T.O. van Erning

  • Acetabular and femoral reconstruction with impacted graft and cement

    Tom J. J. H. Slooff;Pieter Buma;Bernard W. Schreurs;Jan W. Schimmel

  • A physiological approach to the simulation of bone remodeling as a self-organizational control process

    M.G. Mullender;R. Huiskes;H. Weinans

  • A fibril-reinforced poroviscoelastic swelling model for articular cartilage

    W. Wilson;C.C. van Donkelaar;B. van Rietbergen;R. Huiskes

  • Direct mechanics assessment of elastic symmetries and properties of trabecular bone architecture

    B. Van Rietbergen;A. Odgaard;J. Kabel;R. Huiskes

Frequent Co-Authors

Harrie Weinans
Harrie Weinans Utrecht University
Nico Verdonschot
Nico Verdonschot Radboud University
Paj Peter Hilbers
Paj Peter Hilbers Eindhoven University of Technology
Patrick J. Prendergast
Patrick J. Prendergast Trinity College Dublin
Ralph Müller
Ralph Müller ETH Zurich
Andrew A. Amis
Andrew A. Amis Imperial College London
Jorge O. Galante
Jorge O. Galante Rush University Medical Center
Felix Eckstein
Felix Eckstein Paracelsus Medical University
J.R. de Wijn
J.R. de Wijn University of Twente
Lorenzo Moroni
Lorenzo Moroni Maastricht University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Rik Huiskes

Recently Published Articles