World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Physics

D-Index
84
Citations
36491
World Ranking
2648
National Ranking
1303

Richard F. Green publication distribution in Physics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Physics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard F. Green sits on this spectrum.

103–122 publications: 7 scientists 123–142 publications: 10 scientists 143–162 publications: 31 scientists 163–182 publications: 35 scientists 183–202 publications: 53 scientists 203–222 publications: 81 scientists 223–242 publications: 85 scientists 243–262 publications: 112 scientists 263–282 publications: 114 scientists 283–302 publications: 126 scientists 303–322 publications: 136 scientists 323–342 publications: 162 scientists 343–362 publications: 155 scientists 363–382 publications: 156 scientists 383–402 publications: 134 scientists 403–422 publications: 145 scientists 423–442 publications: 147 scientists 443–462 publications: 131 scientists 463–482 publications: 131 scientists 483–502 publications: 116 scientists 503–522 publications: 106 scientists 523–542 publications: 103 scientists 543–562 publications: 87 scientists 563–582 publications: 84 scientists 583–602 publications: 94 scientists 603–622 publications: 70 scientists 623–642 publications: 76 scientists 643–662 publications: 60 scientists 663–682 publications: 54 scientists 683–702 publications: 60 scientists 703–722 publications: 48 scientists 723–742 publications: 64 scientists 743–762 publications: 48 scientists 763–782 publications: 37 scientists 783–802 publications: 43 scientists 803–822 publications: 34 scientists 823–842 publications: 36 scientists 843–862 publications: 32 scientists 863–882 publications: 32 scientists 883–902 publications: 31 scientists 903–922 publications: 25 scientists 923–942 publications: 15 scientists 943–962 publications: 24 scientists 963–982 publications: 13 scientists 983–1,002 publications: 21 scientists 1,003–1,022 publications: 21 scientists 1,023–1,042 publications: 16 scientists 1,043–1,062 publications: 9 scientists 1,063–1,082 publications: 19 scientists 1,083–1,102 publications: 11 scientists 1,103–1,122 publications: 17 scientists 1,123–1,142 publications: 11 scientists 1,143–1,162 publications: 7 scientists 1,163–1,182 publications: 4 scientists 1,183–1,202 publications: 10 scientists 1,203–1,222 publications: 8 scientists 1,223–1,242 publications: 16 scientists 1,243–1,262 publications: 4 scientists 1,263–1,282 publications: 10 scientists 1,283–1,302 publications: 5 scientists 1,303–1,322 publications: 7 scientists 1,323–1,342 publications: 4 scientists 1,343–1,362 publications: 8 scientists 1,363–1,382 publications: 6 scientists 1,383–1,402 publications: 7 scientists 1,403–1,422 publications: 3 scientists 1,423–1,442 publications: 4 scientists 1,443–1,462 publications: 4 scientists 1,463–1,468 publications: 3 scientists 1,469+ publications: 100 scientists
103 publications 1,469+

This scientist: 358 publications — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,469 publications or more.

Richard F. Green D-index placement in Physics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Physics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard F. Green sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 76 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 110 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 143 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 153 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 144 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 167 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 167 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 166 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 132 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 155 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 134 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 137 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 102 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 112 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 110 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 116 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 97 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 103 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 87 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 90 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 78 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 75 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 67 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 69 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 59 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 53 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 42 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 41 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 33 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 32 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 45 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 19 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 24 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 28 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 31 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 20 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 12 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 16 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 24 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 23 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 15 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 15 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 11 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 17 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 12 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 11 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 9 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 9 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 11 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 4 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 8 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 5 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 3 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 4 scientists 184 D-Index: 4 scientists 185+ D-Index: 99 scientists
70 D-Index 185+

This scientist: 84 D-Index — 28th percentile

28% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 185 D-Index or more.

Overview

Richard F. Green is affiliated with the University of Arizona in the United States. The profile reflects a focus on their academic career and research contributions based on available data.

Details regarding recent papers, including titles, years of publication, and venues, are not present in the available information. There is no record of frequent co-authors, which suggests either independent research work or insufficient data to establish recurring collaborations.

The information on frequent publication venues is also not available, and no specific research fields, subfields, or main topics of study have been identified in the data. Consequently, any detailed exploration of the scientist's thematic areas of work or research priorities cannot be provided.

There is no information on book publications, signifying no recorded contributions in the form of authored or edited books associated with established publishers.

Similarly, no awards or honors have been documented for Richard F. Green, leaving the profile without information on recognitions or distinctions in their academic career.

The scientist is currently living according to the data provided.

Best Publications

  • A Relationship between Nuclear Black Hole Mass and Galaxy Velocity Dispersion

    Karl Gebhardt;Ralf Bender;Gary Bower;Alan Dressler

  • THE SLOPE OF THE BLACK HOLE MASS VERSUS VELOCITY DISPERSION CORRELATION

    Scott Tremaine;Karl Gebhardt;Ralf Bender;Gary Bower

  • The M-σ and M-L Relations in Galactic Bulges, and Determinations of Their Intrinsic Scatter

    Kayhan Gültekin;Douglas D.O. Richstone;Karl Gebhardt;Tod Lauer

  • The Emission-Line Properties of Low-Redshift Quasi-stellar Objects

    Todd A. Boroson;Richard F. Green

  • The M-sigma and M-L Relations in Galactic Bulges and Determinations of their Intrinsic Scatter

    Kayhan Gultekin;Douglas O. Richstone;Karl Gebhardt;Tod R. Lauer

  • LSST Science Book, Version 2.0

    Paul A. Abell;Julius Allison;Scott F. Anderson

  • The Palomar-Green Catalog of Ultraviolet-Excess Stellar Objects

    R. F. Green;M. Schmidt;J. Liebert

  • The SDSS View of the Palomar-Green Bright Quasar Survey

    Sebastian Jester;Donald P. Schneider;Gordon T. Richards;Richard F. Green

  • Overview of the Far Ultraviolet Spectroscopic Explorer Mission

    H. W. Moos;W. C. Cash;L. L. Cowie;A. F. Davidsen

  • Black Hole Mass Estimates from Reverberation Mapping and from Spatially Resolved Kinematics

    Karl Gebhardt;Karl Gebhardt;John Kormendy;Luis C. Ho;Ralf Bender

  • The Centers of Early-Type Galaxies with HST. V. New WFPC2 Photometry

    Tod R. Lauer;S. M. Faber;Karl Gebhardt;Douglas Richstone

  • The Space Telescope Imaging Spectrograph Design

    B. E. Woodgate;R. A. Kimble;C. W. Bowers;S. Kraemer

  • The Masses of Nuclear Black Holes in Luminous Elliptical Galaxies and Implications for the Space Density of the Most Massive Black Holes

    Tod R. Lauer;S. M. Faber;Douglas Richstone;Karl Gebhardt

  • Axisymmetric Dynamical Models of the Central Regions of Galaxies

    Karl Gebhardt;Douglas Richstone;Scott Tremaine;Tod R. Lauer

  • The centers of early-type galaxies with hubble space telescope. VI. Bimodal central surface brightness profiles

    Tod R. Lauer;Karl Gebhardt;S. M. Faber;Douglas Richstone

  • The On-Orbit Performance of the Space Telescope Imaging Spectrograph

    R. A. Kimble;B. E. Woodgate;C. W. Bowers;S. B. Kraemer;S. B. Kraemer

  • A Luminous Quasar at Redshift 7.642

    Feige Wang;Jinyi Yang;Xiaohui Fan;Joseph F. Hennawi;Joseph F. Hennawi

  • HST STIS Spectroscopy of the Triple Nucleus of M31: Two Nested Disks in Keplerian Rotation around a Supermassive Black Hole

    Ralf Bender;John Kormendy;Gary Bower;Richard Green

  • M33: A galaxy with no supermassive black hole

    Karl Gebhardt;Tod R. Lauer;John Kormendy;Jason Pinkney

  • A Composite Extreme Ultraviolet QSO Spectrum from the Far Ultraviolet Spectroscopic Explorer

    Jennifer E. Scott;Gerard A. Kriss;Michael Brotherton;Richard F. Green

Frequent Co-Authors

Xiaohui Fan
Xiaohui Fan University of Arizona
Linhua Jiang
Linhua Jiang Peking University
Richard S. Ellis
Richard S. Ellis University College London
John P. Huchra
John P. Huchra Harvard University
Tod R. Lauer
Tod R. Lauer National Science Foundation
Richard E. Griffiths
Richard E. Griffiths Carnegie Mellon University
Douglas O. Richstone
Douglas O. Richstone University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
J. B. Hutchings
J. B. Hutchings National Research Council Canada
John Kormendy
John Kormendy The University of Texas at Austin
Rogier A. Windhorst
Rogier A. Windhorst Arizona State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Richard F. Green

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles