World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering

D-Index
52
Citations
12581
World Ranking
1042
National Ranking
427

Richard E. DeVor publication distribution in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard E. DeVor sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 10 scientists 57–66 publications: 23 scientists 67–76 publications: 32 scientists 77–86 publications: 62 scientists 87–96 publications: 67 scientists 97–106 publications: 91 scientists 107–116 publications: 113 scientists 117–126 publications: 115 scientists 127–136 publications: 130 scientists 137–146 publications: 140 scientists 147–156 publications: 155 scientists 157–166 publications: 132 scientists 167–176 publications: 133 scientists 177–186 publications: 130 scientists 187–196 publications: 140 scientists 197–206 publications: 115 scientists 207–216 publications: 125 scientists 217–226 publications: 117 scientists 227–236 publications: 99 scientists 237–246 publications: 92 scientists 247–256 publications: 100 scientists 257–266 publications: 95 scientists 267–276 publications: 88 scientists 277–286 publications: 77 scientists 287–296 publications: 74 scientists 297–306 publications: 74 scientists 307–316 publications: 62 scientists 317–326 publications: 70 scientists 327–336 publications: 59 scientists 337–346 publications: 58 scientists 347–356 publications: 45 scientists 357–366 publications: 44 scientists 367–376 publications: 36 scientists 377–386 publications: 41 scientists 387–396 publications: 32 scientists 397–406 publications: 23 scientists 407–416 publications: 28 scientists 417–426 publications: 27 scientists 427–436 publications: 25 scientists 437–446 publications: 23 scientists 447–456 publications: 23 scientists 457–466 publications: 20 scientists 467–476 publications: 12 scientists 477–486 publications: 24 scientists 487–496 publications: 18 scientists 497–506 publications: 12 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 21 scientists 527–536 publications: 12 scientists 537–546 publications: 8 scientists 547–556 publications: 16 scientists 557–566 publications: 3 scientists 567–576 publications: 11 scientists 577–586 publications: 6 scientists 587–596 publications: 5 scientists 597–606 publications: 6 scientists 607–616 publications: 7 scientists 617–626 publications: 7 scientists 627–636 publications: 10 scientists 637–646 publications: 4 scientists 647–656 publications: 3 scientists 657–658 publications: 2 scientists 659+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 659+

This scientist: 222 publications — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more.

Richard E. DeVor D-index placement in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard E. DeVor sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 83 scientists 31 D-Index: 113 scientists 32 D-Index: 144 scientists 33 D-Index: 153 scientists 34 D-Index: 189 scientists 35 D-Index: 158 scientists 36 D-Index: 139 scientists 37 D-Index: 127 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 126 scientists 40 D-Index: 104 scientists 41 D-Index: 100 scientists 42 D-Index: 107 scientists 43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44 D-Index: 103 scientists 45 D-Index: 79 scientists 46 D-Index: 88 scientists 47 D-Index: 70 scientists 48 D-Index: 83 scientists 49 D-Index: 44 scientists 50 D-Index: 64 scientists 51 D-Index: 56 scientists 52 D-Index: 50 scientists 53 D-Index: 48 scientists 54 D-Index: 58 scientists 55 D-Index: 52 scientists 56 D-Index: 48 scientists 57 D-Index: 42 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 37 scientists 61 D-Index: 42 scientists 62 D-Index: 44 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 33 scientists 65 D-Index: 29 scientists 66 D-Index: 23 scientists 67 D-Index: 29 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 19 scientists 70 D-Index: 34 scientists 71 D-Index: 26 scientists 72 D-Index: 19 scientists 73 D-Index: 18 scientists 74 D-Index: 19 scientists 75 D-Index: 14 scientists 76 D-Index: 19 scientists 77 D-Index: 8 scientists 78 D-Index: 18 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 17 scientists 82 D-Index: 11 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 7 scientists 85 D-Index: 9 scientists 86 D-Index: 8 scientists 87 D-Index: 6 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 10 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 4 scientists 93+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 93+

This scientist: 52 D-Index — 70th percentile

70% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • The prediction of cutting forces in end milling with application to cornering cuts

    W.A. Kline;R.E. DeVor;J.R. Lindberg

  • An Improved Method for Cutting Force and Surface Error Prediction in Flexible End Milling Systems

    J. W. Sutherland;R. E. DeVor

  • The Mechanics of Machining at the Microscale: Assessment of the Current State of the Science

    X. Liu;R. E. DeVor;S. G. Kapoor;K. F. Ehmann

  • The Prediction of Surface Accuracy in End Milling

    W. A. Kline;R. E. DeVor;I. A. Shareef

  • The effect of runout on cutting geometry and forces in end milling

    W.A. Kline;R.E. DeVor

  • On the Modeling and Analysis of Machining Performance in Micro-Endmilling, Part I: Surface Generation

    Michael P. Vogler;Richard E. DeVor;Shiv Gopal Kapoor

  • Machining Process Modeling: A Review

    K. F. Ehmann;S. G. Kapoor;R. E. DeVor;I. Lazoglu

  • A slip-line field for ploughing during orthogonal cutting

    Daniel J. Waldorf;Richard E. DeVor;Shiv. G. Kapoor

  • An Analytical Model for the Prediction of Minimum Chip Thickness in Micromachining

    X. Liu;R. E. DeVor;S. G. Kapoor

  • On the Modeling and Analysis of Machining Performance in Micro-Endmilling, Part II: Cutting Force Prediction

    Michael P. Vogler;Shiv Gopal Kapoor;Richard E. DeVor

  • A Mechanistic Model for the Prediction of the Force System in Face Milling Operations

    H. J. Fu;R. E. DeVor;Shiv Gopal Kapoor

  • A Mechanistic Approach to Predicting the Cutting Forces in Drilling: With Application to Fiber-Reinforced Composite Materials

    V. Chandrasekharan;S. G. Kapoor;R. E. DeVor

  • Modeling and interpretation of fiber orientation-based failure mechanisms in machining of carbon fiber-reinforced polymer composites

    Kevin A. Calzada;Shiv G. Kapoor;Richard E. DeVor;Johnson Samuel

  • Microstructure-Level Force Prediction Model for Micro-milling of Multi-Phase Materials

    Michael P. Vogler;Richard E. DeVor;Shiv G. Kapoor

  • Machining-Induced Residual Stress: Experimentation and Modeling

    Kurt Jacobus;R. E. DeVor;S. G. Kapoor

  • Investigation of the Dynamics of Microend Milling—Part I: Model Development

    Martin B. G. Jun;Xinyu Liu;Richard E. DeVor;Shiv G. Kapoor

  • Mechanistic Modeling of the Ball End Milling Process for Multi-Axis Machining of Free-Form Surfaces

    Rixin Zhu;Shiv G. Kapoor;Richard E. DeVor

  • Development of meso-scale machine tool (mMT) systems

    Michael P. Vogler;Xinyu Liu;Shiv G. Kapoor;Richard E. DeVor

  • A Dual-Mechanism Approach to the Prediction of Machining Forces, Part 1: Model Development

    W. J. Endres;R. E. DeVor;Shiv Gopal Kapoor

  • The Effects of Variable Speed Cutting on Vibration Control in Face Milling

    S. C. Lin;R. E. DeVor;S. G. Kapoor

Frequent Co-Authors

Shiv Gopal Kapoor
Shiv Gopal Kapoor University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Kornel F. Ehmann
Kornel F. Ehmann Northwestern University
O. Burak Ozdoganlar
O. Burak Ozdoganlar Carnegie Mellon University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Students interested in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering often explore interdisciplinary opportunities to enhance their career prospects. One growing trend is pursuing an accelerated applied behavior analysis masters online, which offers valuable skills in data-driven problem solving and human factors engineering. These competencies are highly relevant in fields like aerospace system design and automation.

When considering advancing your education, it’s important to plan strategically. For those exploring graduate schools in allied fields such as speech-language pathology (SLP), understanding how many slp grad schools should i apply to can inform application strategies and improve acceptance chances. This thought process applies broadly to competitive engineering programs as well.

Finding accessible programs is another key factor for many students. If you are interested in related health science areas intersecting with engineering, checking out the easiest speech pathology programs to get into might offer insights into program acceptance trends, financial aid, and admission flexibility that could influence your educational choices.

Cost transparency is vital when selecting an online degree. Exploring information on speech pathology degree cost online emphasizes the importance of budgeting for tuition, fees, and additional expenses, which is equally relevant for engineering students weighing the value of their investment in advanced education.

Best Scientists Citing Richard E. DeVor

Recently Published Articles