What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
- Mechanical engineering
- Composite material
- Statistics
The scientist’s investigation covers issues in Machining, Structural engineering, Edge, Mechanical engineering and Chip formation.
His study in the field of End milling is also linked to topics like Surface micromachining.
His Structural engineering research includes themes of Vibration, Development and Cutting force.
The study incorporates disciplines such as Thrust, Stress and Cutting tool in addition to Edge.
His Mechanical engineering study typically links adjacent topics like Process.
His Chip formation study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Pearlite, Ferrite and Finite element method.
His most cited work include:
- The prediction of cutting forces in end milling with application to cornering cuts (411 citations)
- An Improved Method for Cutting Force and Surface Error Prediction in Flexible End Milling Systems (363 citations)
- The Mechanics of Machining at the Microscale: Assessment of the Current State of the Science (326 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
Machining, Mechanical engineering, Structural engineering, Composite material and Cutting force are his primary areas of study.
Richard E. DeVor studies Chip formation, a branch of Machining.
The various areas that Richard E. DeVor examines in his Mechanical engineering study include Engineering drawing and Finite element method.
His work deals with themes such as Face and Process, which intersect with Engineering drawing.
His Structural engineering research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Vibration, Cutting tool, Thread and Thrust.
Richard E. DeVor usually deals with Vibration and limits it to topics linked to Stability and Control theory.
He most often published in these fields:
- Machining (42.55%)
- Mechanical engineering (26.06%)
- Structural engineering (22.87%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2005-2016)?
- Machining (42.55%)
- Mechanical engineering (26.06%)
- Composite material (12.23%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
Richard E. DeVor mainly investigates Machining, Mechanical engineering, Composite material, Structural engineering and Chip formation.
In his research, Richard E. DeVor undertakes multidisciplinary study on Machining and Surface micromachining.
His research ties Background noise and Mechanical engineering together.
The Structural engineering study combines topics in areas such as Surface roughness and Engineering simulation.
His study explores the link between Chip formation and topics such as Chip that cross with problems in Edge.
His Cutting force research incorporates elements of Viscosity and Surface tension.
Between 2005 and 2016, his most popular works were:
- An Analytical Model for the Prediction of Minimum Chip Thickness in Micromachining (193 citations)
- Investigation of the Dynamics of Microend Milling—Part I: Model Development (101 citations)
- Modeling and interpretation of fiber orientation-based failure mechanisms in machining of carbon fiber-reinforced polymer composites (88 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
- Mechanical engineering
- Composite material
- Statistics
His primary scientific interests are in Machining, Chip formation, Composite material, Structural engineering and Mechanical engineering.
Machining is a subfield of Metallurgy that Richard E. DeVor tackles.
His Chip formation study which covers Cutting tool that intersects with Surface integrity.
Richard E. DeVor combines subjects such as Vibration, Thread, Chip and Stability with his study of Structural engineering.
His work investigates the relationship between Chip and topics such as Edge that intersect with problems in Surface roughness.
His work on Cutting force and Rake angle is typically connected to Surface micromachining as part of general Mechanical engineering study, connecting several disciplines of science.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
