World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Mathematics

D-Index
32
Citations
5443
World Ranking
3154
National Ranking
1

Ricardo Fraiman publication distribution in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mathematics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ricardo Fraiman sits on this spectrum.

42–46 publications: 3 scientists 47–51 publications: 5 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 20 scientists 62–66 publications: 14 scientists 67–71 publications: 25 scientists 72–76 publications: 19 scientists 77–81 publications: 35 scientists 82–86 publications: 50 scientists 87–91 publications: 60 scientists 92–96 publications: 86 scientists 97–101 publications: 84 scientists 102–106 publications: 83 scientists 107–111 publications: 90 scientists 112–116 publications: 99 scientists 117–121 publications: 90 scientists 122–126 publications: 91 scientists 127–131 publications: 109 scientists 132–136 publications: 110 scientists 137–141 publications: 98 scientists 142–146 publications: 112 scientists 147–151 publications: 102 scientists 152–156 publications: 88 scientists 157–161 publications: 106 scientists 162–166 publications: 83 scientists 167–171 publications: 102 scientists 172–176 publications: 77 scientists 177–181 publications: 81 scientists 182–186 publications: 78 scientists 187–191 publications: 71 scientists 192–196 publications: 92 scientists 197–201 publications: 64 scientists 202–206 publications: 69 scientists 207–211 publications: 64 scientists 212–216 publications: 62 scientists 217–221 publications: 58 scientists 222–226 publications: 53 scientists 227–231 publications: 50 scientists 232–236 publications: 46 scientists 237–241 publications: 46 scientists 242–246 publications: 46 scientists 247–251 publications: 43 scientists 252–256 publications: 29 scientists 257–261 publications: 45 scientists 262–266 publications: 30 scientists 267–271 publications: 33 scientists 272–276 publications: 34 scientists 277–281 publications: 30 scientists 282–286 publications: 31 scientists 287–291 publications: 21 scientists 292–296 publications: 34 scientists 297–301 publications: 26 scientists 302–306 publications: 10 scientists 307–311 publications: 17 scientists 312–316 publications: 23 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 16 scientists 327–331 publications: 26 scientists 332–336 publications: 13 scientists 337–341 publications: 13 scientists 342–346 publications: 16 scientists 347–351 publications: 17 scientists 352–356 publications: 12 scientists 357–361 publications: 18 scientists 362–366 publications: 18 scientists 367–371 publications: 9 scientists 372–376 publications: 11 scientists 377–381 publications: 8 scientists 382–386 publications: 8 scientists 387–391 publications: 9 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 8 scientists 402–406 publications: 11 scientists 407–411 publications: 6 scientists 412–416 publications: 6 scientists 417–421 publications: 9 scientists 422–426 publications: 8 scientists 427–431 publications: 5 scientists 432–436 publications: 8 scientists 437–441 publications: 8 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 4 scientists 452–456 publications: 4 scientists 457–461 publications: 2 scientists 462–466 publications: 2 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 3 scientists 477–481 publications: 3 scientists 482–486 publications: 6 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 5 scientists 502–506 publications: 1 scientists 507–511 publications: 6 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 1 scientists 522–526 publications: 3 scientists 527–531 publications: 1 scientists 532–536 publications: 4 scientists 537+ publications: 100 scientists
42 publications 537+

This scientist: 145 publications — 35th percentile

35% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 537 publications or more.

Ricardo Fraiman D-index placement in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mathematics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ricardo Fraiman sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 174 scientists 31 D-Index: 151 scientists 32 D-Index: 174 scientists 33 D-Index: 117 scientists 34 D-Index: 136 scientists 35 D-Index: 127 scientists 36 D-Index: 145 scientists 37 D-Index: 153 scientists 38 D-Index: 150 scientists 39 D-Index: 150 scientists 40 D-Index: 138 scientists 41 D-Index: 136 scientists 42 D-Index: 93 scientists 43 D-Index: 108 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 112 scientists 46 D-Index: 103 scientists 47 D-Index: 75 scientists 48 D-Index: 59 scientists 49 D-Index: 67 scientists 50 D-Index: 60 scientists 51 D-Index: 57 scientists 52 D-Index: 59 scientists 53 D-Index: 62 scientists 54 D-Index: 60 scientists 55 D-Index: 50 scientists 56 D-Index: 42 scientists 57 D-Index: 54 scientists 58 D-Index: 50 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 41 scientists 61 D-Index: 35 scientists 62 D-Index: 40 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 31 scientists 65 D-Index: 27 scientists 66 D-Index: 29 scientists 67 D-Index: 19 scientists 68 D-Index: 25 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 18 scientists 71 D-Index: 12 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 13 scientists 74 D-Index: 18 scientists 75 D-Index: 9 scientists 76 D-Index: 11 scientists 77 D-Index: 10 scientists 78 D-Index: 9 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 10 scientists 82 D-Index: 5 scientists 83 D-Index: 5 scientists 84 D-Index: 13 scientists 85 D-Index: 6 scientists 86+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 86+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 86 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • An anova test for functional data

    Antonio Cuevas;Manuel Febrero;Ricardo Fraiman

  • Robust principal component analysis for functional data

    N. Locantore;J. S. Marron;D. G. Simpson;N. Tripoli

  • Trimmed Means for Functional Data

    Ricardo Fraiman;Graciela Muniz

  • Robust estimation and classification for functional data via projection-based depth notions

    Antonio Cuevas;Manuel Febrero;Ricardo Fraiman

  • On the use of the bootstrap for estimating functions with functional data

    Antonio Cuevas;Manuel Febrero;Ricardo Fraiman

  • Linear functional regression: The case of fixed design and functional response

    Antonio Cuevas;Manuel Febrero;Ricardo Fraiman

  • A plug-in approach to support estimation

    Antonio Cuevas;Ricardo Fraiman

  • Cluster analysis: a further approach based on density estimation

    Antonio Cuevas;Manuel Febrero;Ricardo Fraiman

  • Estimating the number of clusters

    Antonio Cuevas;Manuel Febrero;Ricardo Fraiman

  • Recent advances in functional data analysis and high-dimensional statistics

    Germán Aneiros;Ricardo Cao;Ricardo Fraiman;Christian Genest

  • Kernel-based functional principal components (

    Graciela Boente;Graciela Boente;Ricardo Fraiman;Ricardo Fraiman

  • Universal smoothing factor selection in density estimation: theory and practice

    Luc Devroye

  • On depth measures and dual statistics. A methodology for dealing with general data

    Antonio Cuevas;Ricardo Fraiman

  • A Sharp Form of the Cramér-Wold Theorem

    Juan Antonio Cuesta-Albertos;Ricardo Fraiman;Thomas Ransford

  • Selection of Variables for Cluster Analysis and Classification Rules

    Ricardo Fraiman;Ana Justel;Marcela Svarc

  • Impartial trimmed k-means for functional data

    Juan Antonio Cuesta-Albertos;Ricardo Fraiman

  • Multivariate L-estimation

    Ricardo Fraiman;Jean Meloche;Luis A. García-Escudero;Alfonso Gordaliza

  • The random projection method in goodness of fit for functional data

    J. A. Cuesta-Albertos;E. del Barrio;R. Fraiman;C. Matrán

  • Random projections and goodness-of-fit tests in infinite-dimensional spaces

    Juan Antonio Cuesta-Albertos;Ricardo Fraiman;Thomas Ransford

  • Robust nonparametric regression estimation

    Graciela Boente;Ricardo Fraiman

Frequent Co-Authors

Pablo A. Ferrari
Pablo A. Ferrari University of Buenos Aires
Victor J. Yohai
Victor J. Yohai University of Buenos Aires
David J. Balding
David J. Balding University of Melbourne
Philippe Vieu
Philippe Vieu Paul Sabatier University
Fabrice Gamboa
Fabrice Gamboa Federal University of Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées
Adolfo M. García
Adolfo M. García University of San Andrés
Agustín Ibáñez
Agustín Ibáñez Adolfo Ibáñez University
Mariano Sigman
Mariano Sigman Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
Lucas Sedeño
Lucas Sedeño National Scientific and Technical Research Council
James Stephen Marron
James Stephen Marron University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students pursuing Mathematics in the USA, exploring complementary online degrees can broaden career opportunities. Programs like accelerated MBA programs online offer a fast-tracked path to leadership roles, which is ideal for math graduates looking to combine analytical skills with business acumen.

Additionally, pursuing an MS in digital marketing degree cost tuition fees and program structure can be a strategic move. Digital marketing relies heavily on data analytics, making it a suitable field for those with strong quantitative backgrounds.

Many students also consider 1 year MBA programs in USA to quickly enhance their qualifications without a lengthy time commitment. These intensive programs are perfect for leveraging mathematical skills in strategic decision-making and management.

When considering further education, it's worth noting the flexibility offered by programs accepting online MBA transfer credits. This can help reduce time and cost, allowing math graduates to efficiently tailor their educational journey toward their career goals.

Best Scientists Citing Ricardo Fraiman

Recently Published Articles