World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
38
Citations
7534
World Ranking
6540
National Ranking
2214

Norman A. Slade publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Norman A. Slade sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 92 publications — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Norman A. Slade D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Norman A. Slade sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Norman A. Slade is affiliated with the University of Kansas in the United States. Their research spans across the field of Environmental Science, with particular contributions to subfields such as Ecology and Global and Planetary Change.

Their work focuses on several main topics within environmental science, including:

  • Rangeland and Wildlife Management
  • Fire effects on ecosystems
  • Avian ecology and behavior

Norman A. Slade has authored research papers published in venues such as Utah State Research and Scholarship at Utah State University. Among the documented publications is a study titled Factors Affecting Mourning Dove Use of Water in Artificial Catchment Basins in a Dryland Farming Area of Utah, published in 2021. This work examines aspects of avian ecology and behavior within a specific environmental context.

Their publication record includes:

  • Factors Affecting Mourning Dove Use of Water in Artificial Catchment Basins in a Dryland Farming Area of Utah, 2021, Utah State Research and Scholarship (Utah State University)

Norman A. Slade has contributed primarily within the Environmental Science field, with three publications in this area. Their engagement with subfields is also notable, with two publications related to Ecology and one related to Global and Planetary Change.

Coauthorship data does not indicate frequent collaborators, and their publication history predominantly includes single-authored work or collaborations not frequent enough to be cataloged. The researcher has not been recorded as receiving awards.

Best Publications

  • Testing For Independence of Observations in Animal Movements

    Robert K. Swihart;Norman A. Slade

  • Structured-population models in marine, terrestrial, and freshwater systems

    Shripad Tuljapurkar;Hal Caswell

  • Influence of sampling interval on estimates of home-range size

    Robert K. Swihart;Norman A. Slade

  • Apparent Size as the Determinant of Prey Selection by Bluegill Sunfish (Lepomis Macrochirus)

    W. John O'Brien;Norman A. Slade;Gary L. Vinyard

  • Relating Body Size to the Rate of Home Range Use in Mammals

    Robert K. Swihart;Norman A. Slade;Bradley J. Bergstrom

  • An empirical test of using counts of individuals captured as indices of population size

    Norman A. Slade;Susan M. Blair

  • Population Ecology of Uinta Ground Squirrels

    Norman A. Slade;David F. Balph

  • Road Crossing in Sigmodon hispidus and Microtus ochrogaster

    Robert K. Swihart;Norman A. Slade

  • A BIVARIATE HOME RANGE MODEL WITH POSSIBLE APPLICATION TO ETHOLOGICAL DATA ANALYSIS

    J. W. Koeppl;N. A. Slade;R. S. Hoffmann

  • Some Comments on Niche Analysis in Canonical Space

    Bruce A. Carnes;Norman A. Slade

  • Effects of habitat destruction and resource supplementation in a predator-prey metapopulation model.

    Robert K. Swihart;Zhilan Feng;Norman A. Slade;Doran M. Mason

  • Alternatives to Robinson and Redford’s Method of Assessing Overharvest from Incomplete Demographic Data

    Norman A. Slade;Richard Gomulkiewicz;Helen M. Alexander

  • Effects of supplemental food on population dynamics of cotton rats, Sigmodon hispidus

    Terry J. Doonan;Norman A. Slade

  • Home Range Indices for the Hispid Cotton Rat (Sigmodon hispidus) in Northeastern Kansas

    Norman A. Slade;Robert K. Swihart

  • Comparison of traps and baits for censusing small mammals in Neotropical lowlands.

    Neal Woodman;Robert M. Timm;Norman A. Slade;Terry J. Doonan

  • SIZE-BASED DEMOGRAPHY OF VERTEBRATES

    J. R. Sauer;N. A. Slade

  • APPLICATION OF MARK–RECAPTURE MODELS TO ESTIMATION OF THE POPULATION SIZE OF PLANTS

    H. M. Alexander;N. A. Slade;W. D. Kettle

  • Extrapolating inventory results into biodiversity estimates and the importance of stopping rules

    A. Peterson;Norman Slade

  • Statistical Detection of Density Dependence from a Series of Sequential Censuses

    Norman A. Slade

  • THE EFFECT OF SIGMODON HISPIDUS ON SPATIAL AND TEMPORAL ACTIVITY OF MICROTUS OCHROGASTER: EVIDENCE FOR COMPETITION'

    Gregory E. Glass;Norman A. Slade

  • Effect of density reduction on uinta ground squirrels : Analysis of life table response experiments

    Madan K. Oli;Norman A. Slade;F. Stephen Dobson

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert K. Swihart
Robert K. Swihart Purdue University West Lafayette
Gregory E. Glass
Gregory E. Glass University of Florida
Richard Gomulkiewicz
Richard Gomulkiewicz Washington State University
Robert S. Hoffmann
Robert S. Hoffmann National Museum of Natural History
Richard J. Wassersug
Richard J. Wassersug University of British Columbia
Robert M. Timm
Robert M. Timm University of Kansas
Robert D. Holt
Robert D. Holt University of Florida
Malcolm L. Hunter
Malcolm L. Hunter University of Maine
James E. Childs
James E. Childs Yale University
Robert L. Lochmiller
Robert L. Lochmiller Oklahoma State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Ecology and Evolution opens doors to many interdisciplinary pathways, including careers in research, healthcare, and environmental consulting. Today, a growing number of students are seeking flexible education routes that integrate science backgrounds with in-demand healthcare qualifications.

For those interested in exploring clinical roles after a science degree, understanding how to become a nurse practitioner can help outline the steps for transitioning into advanced healthcare fields. Many online programs offer efficient routes for science graduates or working nurses. For instance, there are rn to bsn 6 months pathways and specialized bridge programs tailored to accelerate your education.

Furthermore, professionals with an associate degree in nursing can explore adn to np programs online to qualify for advanced practice roles, combining ecological knowledge with clinical expertise. Non-nurses with a background in science may also take advantage of direct entry msn online programs, enabling them to quickly launch a new healthcare career. These options reflect the dynamic intersections between science education and rewarding professional pathways in the U.S.

Best Scientists Citing Norman A. Slade

Recently Published Articles